The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:24, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A-SUN Energy[edit]

A-SUN_Energy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet basic WP:NOTABLE requirements. Google searches turn up little-to-nothing regarding the company. There are two sources cited in the article as it currently stands. Both are random industry magazines. The company's website does not load a page. Finally, this article was created by User:Asunrapha back in 2011. It probably should've been deleted right there and then.

If I had to hazard a guess, the company folded not too long after it began considering its search engine concealment. Abillionradios (talk) 07:08, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 May 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Appears to be related to Aton Energy (no article) whose history also shows the 2010-11 English installation. Be that as it may, supplying the first installation of a particular size is not inherently notable, and I am not seeing evidence that this company/brand attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:50, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I could not find sources in my searches that would allow the company to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. Cunard (talk) 05:09, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails GNG lacks coverage in news and media. JaredDaEconomist (talk) 05:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No significant coverage.Webmaster862 (talk) 09:57, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. Citobun (talk) 06:59, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.