The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 22:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Xi Computer

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is so honestly advertising-motivated, it's clear it was only started for exactly that, and I found this because a Draft of it was deleted today, and this article's own history shows only one account ever cared to heavily contribute to it, advertising-only contributions naturally; searches unsurprisingly found nothing, and there's clearly no compromises to made with such blatancy. SwisterTwister talk 23:12, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:54, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Demonstration of notability completely absent. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If they are notable, someone will write an article that is more than a straight advertisement. DGG ( talk ) 04:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- investor prospectus / product brochure only. Belongs on the company web site. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - either as a blatant advertisement, or on lack of notability. Take your pick. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:48, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.