The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. An incomprehensible nomination. Even at the time of nomination more than enough of this had been translated for it to be a valid English Wikipedia article, so why nominate for deletion rather than just remove any remaining text that offends you? And what's this "procedural nomination" about? I know of no procedure in Wikipedia that requires any article to be nominated for deletion without common sense being applied. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.