The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  18:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

75 Ark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only mentions in directories used as sources Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 15:40, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - What? There is a cover-story article at CMJ. How is that only a directory mention? 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May have mixed this one up with another article. However there is only a single source. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 15:40, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep label has six notable artists, CMJ cover story Atlantic306 (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I've added another source about it being the first record label to sign a deal with Napster. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 19:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The GNG appears to be met. Exemplo347 (talk) 17:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.