The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2Trom News Group

[edit]
2Trom News Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All citations point back to sources owned by the same company director as 2Trom in an attempt to legitimise the page. Hope Not Hate have researched the site extensively following the revelation in one of 2Trom's outlets that Stephen Yaxley-Lennon is now partnering with a charity. The "charity" is not registered with the Charity Commission for England and Wales, but it is registered with Companies House, where the director is, once again, the director of 2Trom.[1]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mspritch (talkcontribs) 18:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Archibald, Sarah (14 November 2017). "The curious tale of Stephen Lennon's "Charity" partnership". Hope not hate. Retrieved 14 November 2017.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 06:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.