The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2028 Republican Party presidential primaries

[edit]
2028 Republican Party presidential primaries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTALBALL. No major candidate has declared for the Presidency, all this article contains in speculation about who might run in 2028. Esolo5002 (talk) 23:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Its also too early for one in my opinion. The 2024 election isnt even over and we already have a 2028 article that is uneccesary at the moment. Snowboi (talk) 02:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 2028 elections pages shouldn't be made until the 2024 election has actually happened. The article is pure speculation at this stage without any real content to go alongside it. TheFellaVB (talk) 23:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. All opposition to Joe Biden and Donald Trump, barring something truly insane, will be mathematically eliminated on or before March 19. We're about to have our presumptive nominees; I don't see any harm in keeping this or the 2028 Republican Party presidential primaries pages up. WorldMappings (talk) 02:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We are not even finished with the 2024 election season though, and there is not even a 2028 general election page up, so in my opinion, it makes 0 sense to have both the Republican and Democratic primary pages up before the general election page even exists. Snowboi (talk) 18:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment — The article now contains further speculation with the addition of significantly more candidates, which was not my intention. I initially included candidates who were largely believed to be candidates in 2028, not candidates who were mentioned in one article or two as a candidate. The current article is far more conjectural than I conceived. I am willing to support this nomination, but I believe there is redemption here. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 21:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I object to this position. One-off sources do not count as legitimate potential candidacies. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 20:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom + WP:TOOSOON --Devokewater|(tαlk) 14:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.