The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as the consensus seems clear and I would've voted keep myself (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 19:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Rajshahi mosque bombing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS Itspublic (talk) 01:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I don't really think that this article fails WP:NOTNEWS, as it is certainly not 'routine reporting' (point 2 of NOTNEWS), rather, it is a bombing attack which may or may not have been perpetuated by ISIS in Bangladesh. What's more, many other articles of its kind exist (like 2015 Kharkiv bombing). It has also been mentioned in several reliable sources (cited in the article) including Reuters and the New York Times. Dschslava (talk) 03:46, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This does not fail WP:NOTNEWS, the event of a suicide bombing in Ahmadi mosque in Bangladesh is notable and has been widely reported which establishes that notability.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep significant suicide bombing with internaitonal coverage.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:47, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.