The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (Delete all). No evidence/argument advanced for notability, entirely unsourced. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012-2013 Dallas Sidekicks season

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Unsourced article with no indication of notability. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following article's for similar reasons. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - unsourced, no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 13:03, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom and Snowman. Kaldari (talk) 20:21, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. MaNeMeBasat (talk) 11:39, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Query - why have only some season articles for these teams been nominated and not all? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.