The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:15, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Pilot Pen Tennis

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about an event which hasn't happened yet, although it is referred to in the past tense. I don't understand why people insist on creating articles for events which haven't happened yet. Just wait until the event happens, then create the article for it. SnottyWong ^spout 21:54, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:58, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep being part of the 2010 US Open Series appears to be notable, and I'm seeing significant coverage on Google News. Far-flung speculative articles on future events can be problematic, but this is only a couple of weeks away. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:06, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is an article about a future event, but it has been planned and the match schedule has been posted online (http://www.pilotpentennis.com/ScheduleAndDraws/MatchSchedule/). I personally agree that it was created before it was needed, but I am unaware of the exact policy regarding this. I noticed that 2014, 2018, and 2022 FIFA World Cup are already articles. 2012 and 2016 Summer Olympics also exist. I am sure there are plenty of other "future" articles out there. Therefore it seems that if the planning for a notable event has been made publc, there is some precedent for an editor to create an article for it. I certainly am opposed to deleting someone's good faith effort to add verifiable and notable information to wikipedia. Cmcnicoll (talk) 06:30, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Probably created a little early but not excessively so. Tournament is scheduled and, crucially, wildcards have been handed out so there is information to put in the article etc. --129.234.252.66 (talk) 13:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.