The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Many season articles are somehow kept regardless, but I'm a fan of Merging these Cincinatti Reds articles to a new page that has all the current seasons from 2000 +, unless it's a World Series team from that year, indviudual seasons aren't notable for its own article. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup21:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I agree with Jaranda. All seasons that weren't overly notable or successful should be moved to the one place. G1ggy(t|c|p)07:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: Definitely based on independent information that you can verify. If you add more information as to why it is notable, I would even vote keep. Chengwes07:11, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (and finish), or else Merge into an article about the seasons by decade. Maybe we don't need a game-by-game log, as that can be linked to elsewhere. Realkyhick17:42, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to the recent additions stated above and there are articles under constructions for some from 1950 to today.--JForget00:29, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are hundreds of pages on individual MLB seasons, and deleting just this one seems arbitrary. Employing the same thought process I used in this AfD discussion, having or not having articles on individual seasons is something that should be taken up at the Wikiproject, not AfD, with the decision being a result of Wikiproject consensus. SliceNYC(Talk)01:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Dayleyj. Unless someone is volunteering to fix this article, nominator is right.... this was started and abandoned. Delete it, and somebody who cares about the Reds would undoubtedly create a better article, using 2004 or 2006 as their model. Mandsford03:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep and obviously Expand, Per articles of similar nature. Originator abandoning an article is no validation for deletion.--Truest blue 06:52, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.