The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Krimpet. Someguy1221 00:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1993 Births

[edit]

Just an indiscriminate and uncontrollable list of people born in a certain year. Fails WP:NOT#INFO Arendedwinter 09:17, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Already covered in Category:1993 births. Nate 09:19, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 1993#Births. --Bongwarrior 09:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article consists of nothing except a notice encouraging non-notable teens to contact an editor via his personal e-mail address and ask for themselves to be added, I can see no way this article could add anything encyclopedic to Category:1993 births and 1993#Births ChrisTheDude 09:58, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Echoing what Chris says, this currently-empty article contains a plea for people to send e-mail with their birth dates. The category which Nate mentions should fill this particular niche. Yngvarr (t) (c) 10:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I notice that the only actual name in this list is "C A McDiarmid".. which could very possibly be the "Camcd" who created it. MorganaFiolett 11:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, do not redirect. CRGreathouse (t | c) 13:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, though the blatant display of hubris did raise a hearty chuckle. If an email address weren't involved I'd suggest adding this to Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense. Rob T Firefly 15:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 1993#Births or Category:1993 births. 96T 16:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with 1993. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gp75motorsports (talk • contribs) 18:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What's in the article that's worth merging? --Bongwarrior 18:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wow. The warnings are creepy, and this list is just a way for the user to make himself notable. The category (Category:1993 births) is best. — JuWiki (Talk <> Resources) 21:49, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What can you do with an article that has no people listed and says (26 times) "No births recorded as of yet on wikipedia for this section.To request being recorded as born in 1993 in this section, please send an email to (email address removed). Any inappropriate emails sent to this address will be recorded and reported if the need arise. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED." Thanks for the warning. Bye now. Mandsford 21:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. How did this get to AfD? It should have been speedy deleted on sight as nonsense.--Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 21:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete; why was this even brought to AFD? Tag it as no content or anything. This is highly suspect as the article was created as an attempt to solicit email from 14 year old children. I have tagged this as speedy, it should have been deleted hours ago. A single purpose account, asking kiddies to email him? Am I the only person who finds this bizarre? In future, if people see anything like this, take it to the administrators noticeboard, this could be serious. Masaruemoto 00:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment; I have alerted WP:AN about this. A single-purpose account creating an "article" which attemps to solicit personal details from children should set alarms ringing here. Masaruemoto 00:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.