The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Before 1900s in comics. (non-admin closure) czar · · 19:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1885 in comics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am conflicted on this one. The article appears to be part of a series by year with the same theme. (Disclaimer: I haven't looked at any of the others.) But there is nothing I can even remotely call notable in the article and there are no sources. Is there a broader topic it can be merged into? Ad Orientem (talk) 00:26, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 02:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 02:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I second this. I was unaware of Before 1900s in comics when I created 1885 in comics, and would've put the info there if I had. For what it's worth, the only reason I created the page was to help de-orphan Harold R. Heaton. Argento Surfer (talk) 16:38, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.