- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- 10Bet, LLC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails both the general notability guideline and the specific guideline for companies, as has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources.
Most of the references in the article don't mention the company at all, and in some cases it is not clear why they've been added. The ones that do mention the company are Forbes, which includes a quote from the company CEO about Donald Trump but doesn't describe the company itself, and fansided.com, which mentions the company but is not a reliable source. There are also a collection of references to sources like the company's LinkedIn page, which are primary sources and not an independent indication of notability.
Overall, am not seen anything that suggests this company meets the notability guidelines, or comes particularly close to doing so. Euryalus (talk) 10:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.