The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: This is utter rubbish. There are links to other sources of information to support the article. It charted in Austria so this is a charted album. --Cexycy (talk) 00:25, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I concur... what do you mean unsourced? Look at the page history and the sources were there long before your AfD. AfD's are for non-notable or poorly-sourced. This article could use some independent reviews, but that should encourage improvement by the community, not an AfD. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs)17:58, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - can you point out the significant coverage of this album that is required for it to have a Wikipedia article? It currently doesn't show any references. Rapido (talk) 10:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the general precedent on Wikipedia is that if a band is notable, their full-length commercially-released albums get articles. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind15:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.