This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --malathion ^talk 22:08, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't why this is titled this way. Most of the information is covered by Antarctica. Mmmbeer 17:55, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: info already covered by Antarctica. --Ragib 17:58, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Misguided idea. -- RHaworth 18:06:35, 2005-07-31 (UTC)
• Delete. This content is duplicated by Antarctica. Tobycat 18:42, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Please delete this failed project. UniReb 20:45, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nice idea, but has no future. --Apyule 07:44, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.