April 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Light2021, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you are blocked from editing, if you wish to say anything at the sockpuppet investigation then please feel free to add your comments here and I will be happy to copy them across for you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zedopuppy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Kindly unblock me. I am new here, I am not aware of the rules. It won't be repeated again. My sincere apology. I want to become a contributor. thanks Zedopuppy (talk) 16:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am entirely unconvinced that you are entirely unrelated to Light2021 (talk · contribs) and John2021 (talk · contribs), especially given the sockpuppet investigation results. And you've done nothing to convince me otherwise. Your claim that you are new here seems unlikely in the extreme, given your editing history. Yamla (talk) 16:57, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not change an unblock request after it has been answered, as you did here. If you have more you want to say, please make a new request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- I am new here, I am not aware of the rules. It won't be repeated again. My sincere apology. I want to become a contributor here. I am new editor here who is learning. probably did not know editing properly. I am not related or if not convincing, What should be done? please explain.. I am ready to move.. thanksZedopuppy (talk) 17:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]