Welcome!

Hello, Wolf Paradox! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Brookie :) { - like the mist, he's here and then he's gone!} (Whisper...) 09:14, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Wolf Paradox, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Wolf Paradox! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shrine of the Irish Oak Inc

[edit]

The article Shrine of the Irish Oak Inc has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources about the church, only social media. Associated with the Universal Life Church, which is an "ordination" mill.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shrine of the Irish Oak Inc

[edit]

The article Shrine of the Irish Oak Inc has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of citations and notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the page is deleted, we as an organization withdraw the right to display any of our pictures, which we hold the legal copyrights too on wiki commons, or wikipedia itself

Nomination of Shrine of the Irish Oak Inc for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shrine of the Irish Oak Inc is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrine of the Irish Oak Inc until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 05:03, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added new non church controlled links to show it is a legal church , but the main fact this article was flagged is because we associate with the ULC even thought we are and have always been our own church and was even late in associating with them, we started in 2004 and only chartered with the ULC in 2013