WikiMan53 (talk • contribs • count) | Can I have your autograph? 13:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Ok I looked but I still can't figure it out :(
((helpme| Can some one format my ''' click here''' page with a [[dodger blue|dodger blue background]] and a [[red|red]] border?)) Thanks!
WikiMan53 (talk) (click here) 14:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm trying to lay off signing signature pages, but I guess this is okay since you asked me. Btw, DO NOT CLICK HERE!! ~Steptrip 15:08, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Okay I redone my signature in your autogragh book. Now can you do me a favor and sign here? Retiono Virginian 16:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Could you sign [[my autogragh book and now explain why you have posted the same message twice on my talk page? Retiono Virginian 20:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
((helpme))
Has there really been a tfd on the vote symbols as said here? WikiMan53 (talk) (click here) 20:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Just a friendly reminder that there is more to Wikipedia than autographs and user space. I've noticed that since January you've only made a handful of main space edits but hundreds of user and user talk edits, especially dealing with signatures and autographs. Please don't forget that we're here to build an encyclopedia. Thanks, Metros232 21:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 00:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
If you are experiencing a 'User list is corrupt' message, it is because you are not running the latest version of the software.
You should download the latest version (1.35) and ensure you are approved to use it.
Good luck with the vandal fighting! Ale_Jrbtalk 15:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Please do not spam users' talk pages telling them to sign your autograph page. It is against Wikipedia conventions to take such actions and has led to some users being blocked for spamming. Thanks, Metros232 03:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
-Paloma Walker 04:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
((helpme)) Please do not place ((helpme)) on your User talk page asking for MfD's to be closed, an admin will come along when the time is necessary, speedy delete does not seem appropriate here as only one suggested this, Helpme is meant for problems Wikipedians have, not for MfD's. Thank you. Tellyaddict 17:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi from ME! Partyhatunicorn 15:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
I had put DO NOT ERASE ABOVE THIS LINE and he did WikiMan53 (talk) (click here) 19:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
((helpme)) sorry about the rule. Hey is there a way to nominate an admin for DEadminship
Uhh, why exactly did you put something about autograph pages on my user talk page? Metros232 00:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on User_talk:WikiMan53. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you.
Generally speaking, the three-revert rule does not apply to user talk pages, but in this case, it most likely does. It is clearly against guidelines to put a fake new messages box on the top of your talk page, so please stop reverting other editor's removal of the box. Please review WP:USER for guidelines about what is and isn't appropriate on your user pages. Regards, ➪HiDrNick! 19:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
((helpme))
How do you get someone to close a mfd? I would like someone to see this and speedy close it as it has gotton all Deletes WikiMan53 (talk) (click here) make a sig! 15:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
((help me)) I was just wondering how to get someone to close it. How do I? WikiMan53 (talk) (click here) make a sig! 16:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Remember, as I said a few threads up, this is an encyclopedia. Please contribute to it. Since my comment to you a few days ago, you've done nothing but focus on user page issues and have been slightly disruptive (including using the help me template over and over to get attention for an MFD to be closed out of process). So, it's time to shape up. Metros232 17:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Any more disruptive edits (e.g. bad faith MFD nominations) and you're blocked. John Reaves (talk) 06:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't think Werdnabot is working on my talkpage. Can someone fix the code? WikiMan53 (talk) (click here) make a sig! 14:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
A page in which you created for your signature ideas has been listed at WP:MFD to reach consensus on whether to delete it or not, you are free to voice your opinion so we can reach community consensus throughout the next seven days.Tellyaddict 18:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
A good way to shorten your sig is to remove this part: (click here) make a sig!. Spamming links to an autograph book is generally frowned upon. It's ironic to try to shorten your sig by lengthening it. –Pomte 22:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Why did you warn this user? It was an edit to the sandbox. In case you don't realize, experiments like the one s/he made in the sandbox are allowed to help users test editing. Metros232 00:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
((help me))I was just wondering...How do you become a VP mod?
How do you know? — coelacan — 01:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
And if she uses that account to vandalize further it may be blocked. She's not doing that right now, so let it go. You have an encyclopedia to write. That is the only reason to be here. — coelacan — 01:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi WikiMan53, I noticed you reported 167.93.112.82 (talk · contribs) twice. However, the user has made only 1 edit today, has received one warning, and has since stopped. We usually don't block users after only 1 edit, unless it's something really bad. Also, we like to see that the user has received a complete set of warnings (((uw-vandalism1)) all the way to ((uw-vandalism4))) before blocking, just to give people a chance to stop. Hope that's all OK - feel free to ask me if you're in doubt about anything. Thanks, – Riana ऋ 14:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
– Riana ऋ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding ((subst:Smile)) to their talk page with a friendly message.
Aww, thanks WikiMan! I'm off to bed now, but if you leave any messages I'll be sure to answer them ASAP. Take care, – Riana ऋ 17:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
WerdnaBot hasn't been archiving my page lately. Can someone fix it?
((User:MiszaBot/config |algo = old(7d) |archive = ))
-- Real96 19:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I wanted to take a moment to thank you for the good work you've been doing on the encyclopedia lately. I know I criticized you earlier, but you've really turned it around since then, revering vandalism and finding a confirmed sock. Thanks, ➪HiDrNick! 20:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
I've done as you suggested (Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/JJonathan). Does that look okay to you? Cheers. --Kurt Shaped Box 20:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report about Hallpriest9 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. —dgiestc 16:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
*yawn* Happy (early) Birthday!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Da.Tomato.Dude (talk • contribs)
Thanks for your warm welcome to wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cleanup01 (talk • contribs) 18:10, April 26, 2007
I do not put my welcome message on Talk pages that already have material on them.
You welcomed him after I did :P good thought, but the page should probably be reverted. Matthew Brandon Yeager 22:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Metros232 23:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
((helpme))
Is there a code for saying "please use signitures" for example like there is for minor edits: ((minor))
Trampton has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding ((subst:Smile)) to their talk page with a friendly message.
Trampton 23:29, 26 April 2007 (UTC).
Well, User:Netscott said it is okay to have them if they are being used, I do not want to hurt you or him by removing or not.Trampton 23:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC).
Please show me where it says that.:D Trampton 23:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC).
((helpme))
What is the diffrence between ((db-userreq)) and ((db-author)) I looked at CSD1 and CSD7. WikiMan53 t/s Review me! 11:57, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Please don't tell people to delete their user pages (like here). If the MfD's consensus is to delete, then it will be deleted eventually. There is absolutely no need for you to go around telling people to delete their user pages like that.
Also, please never nominate the sandbox for deletion like you did here. Further disruptions like this will lead to a block. Metros232 12:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I do feel that that edit on user talk:maurath should be un-reverted. It was an integral part of our discussion, a just reply to the various things he had said to me, and i strongly disagree that it was enough to be considered an 'attack'. Quote: "cry me a river". Is this preschool? If it is to be removed, then I ask that all of our (maurath's included) discussion be removed from our talk pages and the talk page of trivium (band). Thank you. Isilioth 12:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
What did i say that was "mean"? Isilioth 12:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the award, WikiMan, it's very kind of you! Just a quick note to be careful with things like AIV and MFD, and reverting people's user talk pages - when it comes to interaction with other users, it's best to be safe and give people fairly wide license, unless they're doing something pretty horrible. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions about this. Take care, – Riana ऋ 13:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to tehe functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you.
--
Also, remember that POV disputes don't fall into the blocking category. If you are having problems with a particular editor, try to work it out (possibly asking other editors with similar views for help) or, if that fails, request arbitration. wrp103 (Bill Pringle) (Talk) 13:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't exactly understand what you mean. I mildly support the deletion User:Trampton/Gag, and of fake new message bars in general. You appear to have executed a malformed WP:POINT. (Better than a well formed one, I suppose.)
Metros232 asked you to delete yours because it is against the guideline for no good reason. This page is also contrary to the guideline for no good reason... sorry if I'm missing anything here! GracenotesT § 17:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
If Trampton can have his new message bar and the page his bar leads too may I have mine? Why did metros delete mine so quick but got mad when I deleted Tramptons?
((helpme))
someone PLEASE fix my sig. I messed it up and it comes out like this:
:There:
<
instead of <
, "
instead of "
and so on. Bye. FrancoGG ( talk ) 17:03, 29 April 2007 (UTC) ((helpme))
Can someone help me by telling me how to create a userbox step by step? I looked at the userbox page. <font color="blue">W<font color="red">ik<font color="pink">i<font color="yellow">ma<font color="orange">n5<font color="green">3</font> <font color="green">t</font> <font color="purple">a </font Review me!
Oh please? Can you give me a step by step? I looked at the userbox page
You need to fix your signature right now. Your signature is screwing up the formatting of pages, see this edit for an example. Everything in that page turned blue below your signature. Please take this as your final warning as well. If you continue to cause disruptions through things like this (signatures, userboxes, misuses of VandalProof, etc.) you will be blocked from editing. Metros232 22:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)