This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 49 | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | → | Archive 55 |
An editor named Amaury has repeatedly removed comments from some IPs on my talk page and claims they can do it because they claim the IPs are a sock named Orchomen. A couple problems with this. First, the IPs accounts do not show they are socks. Second, even if they are socks, an editor has every right to leave a sock's comments on their own talk page. Amaury is apparently obsessed with this Orchomen, so much so that they have a section on their user page devoted to them. One other thing. Amaury also restored an expired block template to my page. Can you please deal with Amaury and watch for any more improper removals from my talk page? 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:ADF3:C706:1C77:4C80 (talk) 13:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Would you please block 177.102.80.117 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)? Just adds a few chars, and self reverts. Has done it dozens of times or more. Fills up the queue on Huggle... Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:00, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw your recent activity through AIV. Would you please take a look at a page move for an article with ongoing AfD? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 NY Times Square attack. It is sort of urgent as the title provides false information; claiming an accident to be an attack. But that is my opinion, your unbiased and unprejudiced opinion is requested there. Thanks a lot. —usernamekiran(talk) 20:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For your excellent work at AIV Jupitus Smart 12:51, 19 May 2017 (UTC) |
Do you mind revoking the talk page access for the IP: Special:Contributions/50.252.104.5. They have been blocked from editing for a year but have continued vandalizing their own talk page. I posted a report on AIV but forgot that the already-existing block would cause the helper bot to remove the request. Oops! Jiten Dhandha • talk • contributions • 17:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
The following has been reverted: click here. Please can be reverted? Prinsipe Ybarro (Talk to me | Contributions) 02:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 807 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!
But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.
Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed you semi-protected RFPP indefinitely. Was there a discussion to do so? Not allowing new users and IPs to request unprotection seems defeating the point of that part of the page. Regards SoWhy 19:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
See this. Another obvious one. Glad some people here understand things. :) John from Idegon (talk) 19:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
How did you find this so quick? Tripping the filter? —usernamekiran(talk) 06:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
On the 19th you blocked RP singh love for continuous addition of numbers to university names [1]. Now what appears to be the user's alternate account, Rahul Singh Love, is back at it [2]. I assume it's meant to be phone numbers, but this ain't going anywhere good. I'd suggest shutting this one off as well :/ --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Just fyi, for the hope of them ever making useful edits, see their latest comments here. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 18:55, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Forgot to block him too. He also has left a vandlsim on the same article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1:F18F:FE7A:4457:296D:7F0D:A2B0 (talk) 17:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello Widr,
I am confused by this most recent notification that my edit to the Dusty page was removed. The reason for my confusion is that both my memory and my history confirm that I have never visited any pages with "Dusty" in the title. I have begun edits on some pages but canceled them after I realized I did not have completely accurate information. In any case, thank you for your notification.
-Hoop C. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.201.118.234 (talk) 14:56, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Could you please unprotect user talk:Stanprog? 96.87.65.53 (talk) 23:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 07:14, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Could talk page access be removed, as they are changing the wording of notices. Thanks. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 18:27, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello W. This IP 68.192.236.182 (talk · contribs) has resumed their disruptive editing after the 3 month block you applied expired. Removing phonetic name templates and adding navboxes to articles that are not in them are a couple of the problems. Previous blocks seem to have had no effect at all. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD|Talk 13:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
You blocked this editor a couple days back for disruptive editing on a number of TV-related articles. They're back, still editing disruptively, as User:2601:5C0:4280:3D40:40B4:C59D:3721:A743 . For example, please see Designated Survivor (TV series). Rather nasty stuff on the talk page, too. They seem to represent a number of production-level personnel, a decided WP:COI ----Dr.Margi ✉ 03:09, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi there,
Technical question, when a user is blocked for long-term vandalism, should all of the user's contributions be reverted? I went through a couple of them but would not know whether the edits made by this IP are factual or not. Thanks! –FlyingAce✈talk 21:52, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Your edit has been reverted at Love in the Moonlight page last May 31, 2017, and now the article has been semi-protected because of numerous IP sockpuppets from a blocked user that keeps on re-adding the "Philippine Reception" vandal and the "International broadcast" section. I hope you could undo and remove it. Thanks! -112.198.73.9 (talk) 04:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi... You removed a changes I made to an article of a Musician Emmanuel Kwabena Bartels... The changes were highly accurate and confirmed. I provided a link to the artiste's website (you removed it). I also changed a couple grammar here and there --- Like 'PEE On Da Beat or Pee GH, studied at Mfantsipim School and later graduated from University of Ghana.' from 'Pee GH or PEE On Da Beat was studied at Mfantsipim School and later graduated from University of Ghana.'.
I honestly think these changes are supposed to be allowed for they do not defy any rule here. But all the same thanks. I would also like to know the full reason behind the removal - Maybe, I need to learn something else other than what I know from this very mistake (if there was one - Fully ready to learn from it)
Kindly respond.
Thank You Signed: Pupinsre D. Castre — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pupinsre (talk • contribs) 17:33, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
keep up the good work! those pages that you are deleting are ridiculous. The garmine (talk) 14:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC) |
Is it possible that 101.178.163.208 (talk · contribs) is a block evasion of 58.96.107.130 (talk · contribs), whom you blocked yesterday for a year? Thanks, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
IP user 178.222.124.193 keeps making repetative unsourced, POV edits despite the many warnings they have received. Is there anything that can be done? The article List of wars involving Serbia in particular. 108.54.93.183 (talk) 18:42, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
That was some fast-lightning work there in blocking that IP. I hardly took a sip of my coffee and whoosh they were gone. I admire that swift action, thank you. Wes Wolf Talk 13:40, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Again IP [3]. Please protect article.--Flavius1 (talk) 15:09, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 07:31, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi Widr, Could you block SunitaBahadursingh45 as they're SunitaBahadursingh4 (a sock of Brian fagan), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello. The edits by Special:Contributions/212.108.137.60, who you just blocked, are being continued by Special:Contributions/185.24.81.96, a static company IP in the UK, in an IP range that has featured in previous reports at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shingling334, with Special:Contributions/185.24.81.82 and Special:Contributions/185.24.80.161 being reported as socks there, most probably accessed through VPN or through being a web host (since Shingling seems to be on his annual holiday in Turkey, just like this time last year...). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 14:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)