Welcome!
Hello, Whiteknox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme))
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 03:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC) (Keir Santage)
I think the quotation on your user page should be attributed to somebody, anonymous if nothing else. It looks ambivalent to have a quotation thrown out without reference; it almost communicates plagiarism.
--Whiteknox 23:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Any thoughts on the NPOV issue brought up there? CyberAnth 01:58, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
I think it does display NPOV. Of course this is extremely subjective, but I think that it is reasonable for a page to display its subject in the best light while remaining objective, and this article does that as does most other well-written pages I have read. The negative section that talks about "mindguards" especially indicates that this page does not suppress information purely on the basis of contradiction to a point of view. I think I agree with changing the tag. -- Whiteknox 02:14, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
After reviewing the talk page, like you suggested, I decided to remove the "Libertarian" category tag. Perhaps it's not quite accurate after all. Thanks for the input. --JayJasper --Thanks. --Whiteknox 01:55, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
I haven't taken a look at "Jim Berg" for a long time. He's certainly more notable than Pokemon characters and other emphemera of popular culture that seem to be treated overly seriously here. Let's see what can be done. Thanks for your interest.--John Foxe 20:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
I am trying to suggest an addition to the "Search engine" article but I'm probably going about it the wrong way. Can you assist me with this? My suggestion can be found on the last item on the discussion page of the article. Thanks --Yoav Pridor 05:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Could you please have a look at Picsearch and comment on what you think of the tags at top? --Ceas webmaster 16:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your input on the Picsearch article. I have made some more changes that I hope you like. --Carl Sarnstrand 20:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)