Hello, Virenderthind2019, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Rickyurs (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Alok Pandey (film actor).

User:TomCat4680 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

All sources need to be in English

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|TomCat4680)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TomCat4680 (talk) 11:01, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TomCat4680: Dear Sir, I have also added some references in English and have to add in Hindi because there are mostly hindi language sites in India. Because most of the articles are printed here in Hindi. But Overall I have searched about this actor He is noted actor in india. Thnks Sir Virenderthind2019 (talk) 11:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Game of Votes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet WP:NBOOK. There is just one good source among the 11 in the article...

• the book's publisher - not independent
• Amazon.com - it's a retail opportunity, not independent
• Google Books - firstly it does nothing to show notability, they list everything, and secondly it's already accessible through the ISBN links in the infobox
• Curious Reader - WP:UGC with a retail link
• Indiatimes.com - once I'd archived it (they don't like Europeans reading their stuff it seems - GDPR) it was just a rehash of the dust jacket blurb - it's pretty damning if the reviewer hasn't got past the dust jacket and the foreword.
• ptinews.com is a good source, so good that outlookindia.com, and deccanherald.com copied it word-for-word. That's one source, not three.
• sentinelassam.com quotes the author and provides less than 50 words of their own. That's not an in depth review, or anything approaching it.
• A twitter post by the author's friend - WP:UGC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cabayi (talk) 14:41, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:Pigsonthewing, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 15:04, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi: Hllo sir, Help me to improve this article. How can we improve?

( Virenderthind2019 (talk) 15:42, 15 October 2019 (UTC) )[reply]

Add a reliable, verifiable, independent source which isn't trivial, nor an advert, and which is significant. There's one already, just one more will satisfy the requirements of WP:NBOOK.

You don't need brackets around your signature. The template explaining signatures is a bit misleading there. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 15:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Virenderthind2019. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Virenderthind2019. The template ((Paid)) can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: ((paid|user=Virenderthind2019|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName)). If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159Jklamo (talk) 16:35, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jklamo: Dear Sir,I have Interested to edit or create page on wikipedia. I feels good to do it. That is at all,there is nothing like paid.And I am new on wikipedia,that is why i am asking for help from seniors wiki editor.

@Cabayi: Sir, i have added some references to article.please take a look. And please explain me how to know that which source is reliable, verifiable, independent or not.

None of them meet any of the requirements for reliable, verifiable, independent sources.

• literatefrog.co.in immediately takes me to a different story, "Indian Air Force appoints Air Marshal Rakesh Kumar Singh Bhadauria"
• mynation.com is yet another reprint of the PTI article
• bokus.com is yet another book sales site
• idiscover.lib.cam.ac.uk is another listing which says nothing about the book - they list every book without any critical judgement
• ompublications.in is yet another book sales site

You've stopped signing your posts again. -- Cabayi (talk) 19:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Game of Votes.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like ((PD-self)) (to release all rights), ((self|cc-by-sa-4.0)) (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:45, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Farhat Basir Khan has been removed, as it added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images. You must write your content in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing.

• copyvio twitter image - no evidence of permission - [1] Begoon 12:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Begoon: I feel sorry Sir, I did mistake Because i do not know about copyright claim.I am new here On wikipedia. I am trying to understand evrything. I am fond of editing wikipedia.Please help me and make understand me How to upload photos on wikimedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Virenderthind2019 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Read Wikipedia:Image use policy. In short, if you find an image on the internet it is almost certainly copyrighted and you cannot upload it here. The page I've linked for you has full details of what is acceptable. If you want advice about a particular image you can ask questions at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- Begoon 16:07, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Begoon: Dear Sir, Please help me to upload this pic to https://www.dqindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Prof.-Farhat-Basir-Khan-Profile-Pic.-21.jpg to Farhat Basir Khan's article. I am trying to understand about copyrights.But It Seems to me i need more time to understand. Thanks sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Virenderthind2019 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I just explained to you. You can't just upload pictures you find on the internet because, unless there is a very clear statement which you can link to, in the place that you found it, stating a free license for re-use of the image (which for the vast majority of images you find there won't be), that is a copyright violation, and, as explained above, wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing.

The only exceptions to a free license being required are listed at WP:NFC, but in this case, because this is a living person, those criteria would not apply. For living people only free images may be used - if no free image is available then no image can be used. I honestly suggest you don't even think about uploading images until you have very carefully read and thoroughly understood the pages I linked for you. There is no WP:DEADLINE, so take the time to learn and understand - wikipedia will not go away while you are doing that - there is no rush. -- Begoon 04:51, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Begoon: I understood sir. Thanks sir 😊 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Virenderthind2019 (talk • contribs) 04:56, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Pings (notifications) only work if you sign your posts. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. -- Begoon 05:07, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Begoon: Hi Sir, Can we use this pic https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Farhat_Basir_Khan.jpg to Farhat Basir Khan's page?? It has otrs permission now. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 04:40, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see no reason why not, so I've added it for you. Your 'ping' worked this time, by the way Thank you. -- Begoon 04:47, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Begoon: Hii Sir, Sorry to bother you again. I want to ask you something. Actually i had created a page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alok_Pandey_(film_actor) .then i moved this page to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alok_Pandey .because i thought there is no need to mention (film actor).But now there is a problem in it. I checked on Google that the redirect page is still showing on google.What is the solution for this? Virenderthind2019 (talk) 11:23, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just time, and patience... There's nothing you can do about google search results - eventually, in a day, a week, or sometimes more, they will catch up. We have no control over how quickly, or slowly, google update their search results. It's not much of a problem, though - people will still arrive at the article via the redirect. -- Begoon 11:40, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Begoon: Thanku Sir😊 for giving this information. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 11:44, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Begoon: Hii Sir, I need your help again. Actually i have created a new article on an indian actor. ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishtiyak_Khan ) An editer added some tags on page. I did not understand why. Please check and make me understand that how can i improve this page.

Thank You Virenderthind2019 (talk) 02:46, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I agree with the removals the other editor made. Are you sure this person meets WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. I mean, roles in movies like "Ishtiyak Khan as auto-rickshaw driver" don't sound particularly notable to me... The tags are pretty self explanatory - you need to improve the English grammar, provide more, relevant, reliable sources that show how they are actually notable, not just passing references etc.

Incidentally, I know that you said above that you are not expecting to be paid for your contributions to wikipedia, but I can understand why the question was asked - your pattern of editing does seem to give that impression in several ways. If you are then you should be honest about it. -- Begoon 02:59, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Begoon: About paid contribution to wikipedia, Actually it was written to me by mistake, I wanted to say something else. I am trying to contribute Wikipedia with my heart and Yes i am honest about it. But yes you are right i have grammer problem.but i am improving day by day. And about my recent article- As i checked sir, if he acted in a film as auto rikshawala then he has also acted in other films as supporting role. It seems to me, If at any time an editor is new and he is working hard and contributing, then it becomes the duty of the other editor to help him. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 04:17, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We're volunteers - we don't have "duties". In any case I think I have tried to help you. Do you disagree? If by helping you you mean rewriting all your content for you - no I'm not going to do that. To edit at the English wikipedia you need good English skills - sometimes it might be acceptable to submit content that still needs copyediting, but please bear in mind that it becomes a problem when a disproportionate amount of time needs to be spent "cleaning up" after a user, no matter how good their intentions might be.

Did you read WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR as I suggested? If so, can you briefly sum up how you think this actor meets them? Doing that is an exercise that should help you to improve the article. -- Begoon 04:29, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Begoon: Yes sir, you are right. Thanks for your time. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 05:02, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ashok Masti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jikaoli Kol (talk) 17:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jikaoli Kol: Hii Dear Sir,

I added reliable sources which show that this singer is notable. So why this page should be deleted? Virenderthind2019 (talk) 17:42, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for asking. Please, check WP:NMUSIC. The sources you listed there were about a song of a movie, not about the person. I haven't checked if he's the lead vocalist for that song. Anyway, Phil Bridger has already contested the deletion so I would advise you to improve the article. Jikaoli Kol (talk) 20:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rahul Chahal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable under WP:SINGER

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheOneWorkingAccount (talk) 09:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheOneWorkingAccount:

Hii Dear Sir, He is not a noted singer. But He is noted music video director. Please check references...I added reliable sources which show He is notable video director. I did not mention even single time that he is a singer. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 09:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheOneWorkingAccount:

Please Reply Virenderthind2019 (talk) 09:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kerry Raymond. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Electoral district of Logan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Kerry (talk) 05:01, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dheeraj Jorwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dheeraj Jorwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Raju Jangid (talk) 10:00, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Raju Jangid:

Hii Sir, I understand your opinion. But I have improved the article. Please check and help me to improve if you found something wrong on article. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 11:28, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not rush through articles adding notability tags without looking for sources first, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:50, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306:

Hi dear sir, I have always tried to add a tag only after checking everything but even if I have inadvertently made a mistake somewhere, I apologize and I will take full care of this from now on. regards Virenderthind2019 (talk) 01:27, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Virenderthind2019, what is your relation with Western Penduz, Nalneesh Neel and Ishtiyak Khan? GSS ^💬 08:46, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS:

Hii Dear Sir, I don't have any link or contact directly or indirectly with the above mentioned people. I've interest in creating music and acting related article. As you have concern, what type of discloure i have to give? Virenderthind2019 (talk) 09:38, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then how you own all these images? GSS ^💬 09:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please disclose your connection with user Anshdeepsingh95 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who made no edits on en-wiki, but uploaded two images on commons for your articles, and both of you sent exactly the same email to OTRS for permission. GSS ^💬 12:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS:

Dear Sir, Actually, I am a newbie Wikipedian. To be honest, I dont know all policies and guidelines. I don't have enough knowledge that what is wrong or right. I thought that through the email I should ask for pics from them and attach it to the article so that the article looks good. I took their email address from their social accounts and at that email address I asked for their photos. they send me and I uploaded. I didn't know that leads me into the problems. I am honestly saying i've no connection with those people. I've created those article in my own. I don't get any personal benefit from these pics. I can delete them all. I am so sorry for my silly activities. I do apologize. Please forgive me this time. I will not repeat it again. I am here to contribute constructively. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 13:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hii Dear Sir, I have added some songs with Reliable Sources. Isn't Times of India a reliable source? And added some YouTube links that are uploaded on the official channel of music company. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 11:42, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I think you need to read what I actually said: - If there is something notable to say about any of these items, supported by reliable sources, then add some referenced prose - otherwise this is utterly unencyclopedic - WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Is there something difficult to understand in that comment, or do you just not want to understand it because it doesn't let you do what you want to do?
• Why have you not answered the question about your relationships above? I've been concerned by your clear editing pattern and behaviour that you are doing undisclosed paid editing for some time now. There are several things about your editing (the images being just one) that are simply not credible if you just have "interest in creating music and acting related article" and no relationship to the subjects. I really recommend absolute honesty at this point, because if it is discovered that you are not being open about this then you risk all the articles being deleted, and possibly prevented from being created again. -- Begoon 11:57, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Yunshui ^雲_水 14:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yunshui:

Hii Dear Sir I have made mistakes but inadvertently because I do not know Wikipedia's guidelines very well. I value your decision and I will wait for 1 week. With the guidance of senior people like you, new people like us will be able to become good contributors. Learning from this warning, I will not repeat any further mistake. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 10:48, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Virenderthind2019, If you don't mind, can I ask you to list all the accounts you have created, please? GSS ^💬 11:01, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GSS

I have created only "Virenderthind2019". "Anshdeepsingh95" is my cousin's account. Actually When new contributers do not know terms and conditions very well, then they make many mistakes, As I did. But Now I have understood. I will not repeat these mistakes again. I also have done a lot of good contributions. If I have made some mistakes, I have done very good works also. Please Forgive me this time. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 11:34, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• ...and Anshdeepsingh95? Rising Artists? Arshpreetsinghjosan? Honeyjeetsingh? ... are they all your "cousins" too? -- Begoon 11:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No Sir... I don't know these.. Arshpreetsinghjosan Honeyjeetsingh Rising Artists

If I used the uploaded photos of these users in the articles, does it mean that these articles belong to me?

About "Rising Artists", I want say that I was not well aware of the OTRS's guidelines when I used his uploaded photo. I felt that it was necessary to take OTRS permission before attaching the photo. So Then I took the OTRS Permission from my email id. I feel sorry for my silly activities. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 13:19, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Virenderthind2019 then how Rising Artists sent an email to OTRS using your name? GSS ^💬 13:50, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS I don't know about that Sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Virenderthind2019 (talk • contribs)

• You "don't know these"? So you expect us to believe that, on each occasion, a different new user came along with "singh" in their name, as your sock cousin had, and uploaded an image with an OTRS "permission" for the article you were creating - and you noticed each one, and used it? That would be a remarkable co-incidence, don't you think?

  Hey - I just had an idea - you could stop attempting to treat us like idiots now and be honest as I've suggested several times. It's entirely up to you, but I'm pretty sure that insulting our intelligence isn't going to get you very far. -- Begoon 13:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• So, now that you've had time to think about it, and you are editing again, did you want to respond properly and honestly to the above points, or did you just intend to ignore the matter and carry on? Your statement that you "don't know these" is not at all credible, and your reply to GSS that you "don't know about" Rising Artists sending an email to OTRS using your name is not believable either. I think it would be a really good idea for you to clear these matters up honestly before you continue editing. -- Begoon 08:22, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Begoon: Dear Sir, I had told everything truthfully, but you felt that I was insulting your intelligence. But there is nothing like it, Sir, I respect your intelligence and you. If He/She used my name in otrs permission. This is not my fault. My fault is just that I added a photo to the article which was uploaded by him. I regret the mistakes I have made.And I will not make any further mistake. I Will do good contribute and Will be a responsible contributor. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 11:57, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. GSS ^💬 04:51, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Virenderthind2019

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Scope creep and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Himansh Verma, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: ((proposed deletion/dated...))
3. Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Scope creep)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 13:21, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Virenderthind2019,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Beat Minister for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

scope_creep^Talk 13:35, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Virenderthind2019

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Scope creep and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Beat Minister, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beat Minister.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Scope creep)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 13:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Virenderthind2019

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Scope creep and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Dr Amit Nagpal, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Amit Nagpal.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Scope creep)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 13:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Himansh Verma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himansh Verma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 09:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Virenderthind2019. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Virenderthind2019, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Virenderthind2019. The template ((Paid)) can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: ((paid|user=Virenderthind2019|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName)). If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 scope_creep^Talk 10:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Virenderthind2019, That's good you have made a declaration. For the record: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himansh Verma. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 11:04, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Himansh Verma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Post (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Guri (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guri (singer). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guri (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guri (singer) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 20:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Virenderthind2019,

I am concerned about your birth date addition(s). I normally place a default warning message on users' talk pages when I see this issue, but you appear to be an experienced user. Thus, the situation worries me more than it would normally do.

Please take the time to read the following policies if you have a lot of time, or at least the directly linked sections if you're only looking for the most important parts I'm referring to.

• WP:Biographies of living persons, specifically:
  • WP:BLPPRIVACY about privacy and
  • WP:BLPPRIMARY about primary sources;
• WP:No original research, specifically:
  • WP:PSTS about primary, secondary and tertiary sources.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

Thank you very much in advance.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:18, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree:

Hii Dear Sir, I feel sorry for my mistake. I thought his Instagram post is enough for birthdate.as i saw on this article https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimrat_Khaira

and please check this link https://www.ptcpunjabi.co.in/happy-birthday-jass-manak-here-is-how-he-celebrated-at-midnight/

Is it enough for his birthdate?

Virenderthind2019 (talk) 16:50, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, no worries, and thank you for asking. In the history of the Wikipedia article about Jass Manak (singer), there has been disagreement about the birth date. When there is disagreement about such information, it is best to remove it from the article until the situation is more clear.

As you have correctly noticed, the article about Nimrat Khaira had a similar issue, and I have removed the date from there now, too. Thank you very much for pointing this out; it is understandable that you thought it would be perfectly fine.

Sadly, Wikipedia articles are often of poor quality. For this reason, please only use featured articles as examples for how a good article can look like. Even featured articles, however, can be edited by anyone and may contain severe errors.

If you like to, feel free to have a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 January 4 and search for "result was delete". This is a list of example articles that have existed in the encyclopedia for a long time, and have very recently been deleted.

To answer your original question: No, this is not enough, sorry. The source does not explicitly mention a birth date or even age. Also, "celebrating" a birthday can be done months after the actual birthday. The song name and the article must not be interpreted in this way.

Best regards
~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:40, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]