Were you talking about me? There's nothing wrong with my name, it's actually a surname. It's best you just relax and not cause trouble friend--Balino-Antimod 05:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Antimod has a secret meaning, not telling. But Balino, as Sugaar knows, is a surname.--Balino-Antimod 05:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. I would never delete an insult on someone else's talk page, except if it was full of obscenities like this one was. I do not think it is controversial to say that I also recognized part of the IP number. Khoikhoi has since found out more about 66.36.141.28 (talk · contribs)- you may have a look at the user page of the gentleman.--Pan Gerwazy 11:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about that. When I saw the page, I only looked at the picture and thought it was something analagous to the Fleshlight. When I looked more closely, that's why I freaked out and nuked it.—Řÿūłóñģ (竜龍) 07:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for correcting me - I'd never done put a warning template on anything, and I'm afraid I'm still confused about templates in general.
Since I'm here - can you tell me which welcome template has the automatic "this is an IP address, checkuser, whois, yada-yada" with it? Or is that just an admin template? Thanks again, NinaEliza 07:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
yes i will - i just trying to avoid attackts by giving them the link to my page. Think outside the box 09:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I read your comment on the 3RR board, claiming Itake at least had argued his point and it should have been gone through more thoroughly on the talk page. Have you read that talk page lately? It is quite apparent he did't have a clue about what he was talking about, to be honest. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 10:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
*Confused Look* It wasn't a personal attack. I'm not even entirely sure what gave you that impression. It's not like I deleted the whole article and replaced it with JACK THOMPSON'S A DOUCHE LOL. The thing I put actually happened.--Averross 13:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
EDIT: Wait, you're talking about the TALK page. Well, I thought that it was okay to be opinionated in the discussion threads.--Averross 13:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Psychohistorian]-Psychohistorian 17:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Merry Christmas, and May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg (drop me a line) 20:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Vercalos. I just wanted to throw in my two cents before darting off for visions of sugarplums, &c. I think you jumped the gun on vandal-templating User:87.66.143.74 for their naughty list commentary. While I agree with you that it is original research & doesn't belong in the article, it seems to me that it was a good faith edit not deserving of even the low level warning you gave out. I've caught myself a bunch of times just throwing a template response out on reflex. I mostly wanted to mention it here since I commented on that user's talk page. Cheers --mordicai. 04:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)