Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to United States Forces Japan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

also do you not realise the existence of the AV or AntiVandal tool. the edit has the AV tag on it. AV reverts the edit and marks it as minor but warns the user on the talk page. the primary reason i reverted your edit was the typo in the word flag.Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 14:43, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Horwennefer—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like to note that despite them not being pharaohs, the 21st Dynasty High Priests of Amun and God's Wives of Amun (ex: Herihor and Amenirdis I) also use the Pharaoh infobox for the titulary parameters. The new "secessionist" parameter doesn't really seem necessary when one can simply add "Secessionist Pharaoh" or "Rebel Pharaoh" in the role parameter of the infobox, just as the aforementioned groups of articles do for their respective titles. Star11308 (talk) 20:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star11308: I agree that an additional parameter beneath the role parameter is excessive and superfluous. Hence I have ‘modularized’ the pharaoh parameter; see e.g. Ankhwennefer (pharaoh). I hope this change is acceptable to you. User23242343 (talk) 11:53, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible to remove the "pharaoh" label when not in use with the rebel parameter? As mentioned before, articles on people who used the royal titulary but wouldn't really be considered pharaohs use the infobox such as the High Priests of Amun, Divine Adoratrices and God's Wives of Amun. Star11308 (talk) 20:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star11308: Ah, I thought they were still somewhat referred to as pharaoh. Unfortunately, no, that would not really be possible and I wouldn't support it either. If these people weren’t pharaohs (in whatever capacity) then they shouldn’t use the pharaoh infobox. However, note that Template:Ancient Egyptian royal titulary case exists and it can be used within virtually any infobox (see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cleopatra&oldid=1147504324). User23242343 (talk) 08:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you. I wasn't aware of that template existing as a standalone template and I'll be sure to add it in when I get the chance. Star11308 (talk) 09:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I'm actually doing it (over on Amenirdis I), I realize I have no idea what I am doing as I seldom really use the source editor besides adding links to articles in footers and such. I could use a hand, if you're available. Star11308 (talk) 23:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star11308: Of course but unfortunately I'm a little bit busy right now; I will gladly take a look at it when I have the time. User23242343 (talk) 18:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star11308: is that what you had in mind? User23242343 (talk) 09:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you! I'm not really familiar with the source editor, and I was quite overwhelmed and confused trying to figure it all out myself. I'll put that into the other God's Wife and Adoratrice articles, though I'm a still bit weary when it comes to the High Priests of Amun due to how they depicted themselves as pharaohs and held sovereignty over Upper Egypt during the 21st Dynasty. Star11308 (talk) 10:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star11308: Unfortunately my knowledge of ancient Egypt is limited to the Ptolemaic Kingdom, so I can’t really help you out here. If the High Priests ruled in rebellion to the pharaohs, then perhaps the pharaoh infobox with the ‘rebel’ parameter can be used here. User23242343 (talk) 10:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained and incomprehensible summaries are noted. and you use editing like a sandbox, but now it's censored today. If the source is not clearly presented, rollback may eventually be the answer. The contribution you made at Habsburg monarchy three edits has been cancelled. Please excuse me. I'm afraid I can't help it, depending on the editorial guidelines, Wikipedia policies and guidelines. It's not like it's just a Wikipedia, but... In fact, such content and sources are determined by the Wikipedia itself, so verification is also carried out, so you have to choose carefully. Please refer to these below and be careful in the future.

1. Wikipedia:AntiVandal (AV)
2. Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1

I want you to be aware that the editing done by the parties is wrong and that it violates the two policies. --Vichycombo (talk) 13:49, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]