Archives (Index)

2022/July

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

If you had looked at the edit you reverted, youd have seen that I was reverting a nationalistic edit made by an editor who has been brought to ANI.

71.233.63.157 (talk) 21:34, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I always review edits and their content before reverting. Can you provide context to the situation? From my perspective, it seemed like an IP editor was reverting a series of edits for no given reason (your edit summaries had little to no context). TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 21:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restore Trust: The actual entry as written before is inaccurate. Restore Trust had nothing to do with motions to the 2022 AGM on Rewilding and Pride. This was wrongly reported in Telegraph and Guardian but both subsequently printed corrections. See correction at bottom of this Guardian report: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/oct/31/national-trust-set-for-fresh-battle-over-culture-wars

Also see correction at end on this Telegraph report: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/environment/2022/09/07/national-trust-fears-many-volunteers-wont-come-back-numbers/

Also the use of "seeks top take over control" is not neutral. Restore Trust put up candidates for election - even if all seven had won, they would only have been a minority. The Council has 37 members - and does not have Executive power in any case 195.162.12.14 (talk) 16:31, 15 December 2022 (UTC 195.162.12.14 (talk) 16:33, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You removed 75% of the sources on the page. Please back up your claims (on the article, not on my talk page). TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 16:54, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. Recently, you reverted my fix to Kamal Haasan.

If you did this because the references should be removed from the article, you have misunderstood the situation. Most likely, the article originally contained both <ref name="foo">...</ref> and one or more <ref name="foo"/> referring to it. Someone then removed the <ref name="foo">...</ref> but left the <ref name="foo"/>, which results in a big red error in the article. I replaced one of the remaining <ref name="foo"/> with a copy of the <ref name="foo">...</ref>; I did not re-insert the reference to where it was deleted, I just replaced one of the remaining instances. What you need to do to fix it is to make sure you remove all instances of the named reference so as to not leave any big red error.

If you reverted because I made an actual mistake, please be sure to also correct any reference errors in the page so I won't come back and make the same mistake again. Also, please post an error report at User talk:AnomieBOT so my operator can fix me! If the error is so urgent that I need to be stopped, also post a message at User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OrphanReferenceFixer. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 13:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive this message in the future, add ((bots|optout=AnomieBOT-OrphanReferenceFixer)) to your talk page.[reply]