This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Phillies do not have a rivalry with the Los Angeles Dodgers. The Pirates rivalry is dubious at best and not current in any event. — KV5 • Talk • 19:12, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
I understand wanting to link the histories and am totally in favor of it. However, the way the sentence was written doesn't refer to the history itself. If it was re-written to the aspect of "[History of the New York Giants (NL)|the Giants had spent x number of years in NY] before moving to SF" then that makes sense. Arnabdas (talk) 20:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Many of my fixes are correct, namely the Glen Davis link (I didn't realized it is a disambiguation page, so it should be fixed), use of last name when referring to people, capitalizing only the first word in section titles, the conditional past tense... I don't think I use present tense at all, although I may have overlook that and make some mistakes. Also, I should have made the edit in each section instead of the whole article, that allows you to revert my edit easily. I will reintroduce my edits for each section and then you could edit to fix/improve my edit without reverting everything. Sounds good?—Chris!c/t 21:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
The backlog is a bit of a problem. I am hoping to knock the sports one back a bit
The article Cardinals–Royals rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:27, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cardinals–Royals rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardinals–Royals rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cardinals–Royals rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardinals–Royals rivalry (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kansan (talk) 20:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
I'm not trying to start a fight here but "ballooning out of control" is extreme wording considering there were only two rivalries you removed so to insinuate the section was turning into the New England Patriots rivalry section was unnecessary. Furthermore, the Raiders section was listed under "Historical rivalries" before you removed it because it was just that with meetings such as the Heidi Game, Al Davis' clear dislike for the team and their modern playoff matches. The Colts rivalry, I feel, has some considerable history to it given their Super Bowl meeting and their recent contests though getting rid of that is a bit more understandable. Point being, it would have been nice if you could have discussed it on the TP first before getting heavy handed with the backspace button. -- The Writer 2.0 Talk 19:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |