User:Seabuckthorn/Archive Header
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
For reviewing Michael Novogratz and Selina Meyer for GA status, and for working so well with your mentor and the nominator, I award you the Teamwork Barnstar. Keep up the good work! – Quadell (talk) 18:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC) |
I feel that you are barely looking at the articles that you are passing.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:33, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Good Article Recruitment Barnstar | ||
You have completed several thorough, high-quality reviews, and your open reviews are being handled appropriately. Because you have shown expertise with the GA criteria, I'm proud to graduate you to a fully-qualified GAN reviewer. If you have any specific questions with any future reviews, you can always ask me, or leave a question at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations. Thanks for your service to Wikipedia, – Quadell (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC) |
First off, let me say thanks for reviewing my articles. Second, I made the changes you suggested and dropped a line on the GA review page, but it looks like it didn't refresh (it seems the issue is affecting "Evicted!" and "Lady & Peebles" as well), so I thought I'd just post on your talk page. How do these changes look?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Have you noticed my responses to your concerns?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
I would give one last piece of advice regarding GAN reviews, that I didn't mention during our mentorship. I'd recommend against having too many GAN reviews open at the same time. It's great that you're performing so many GAN reviews, and it's really helping reduce the backlog! Your enthusiasm is fantastic. But currently, you have a couple that you accepted for review 8 or 9 days ago, but that you have not yet posted a review, because you've been working on other GAN reviews instead. Usually, it shouldn't take more than 7 days between when you accept a GAN for review and when you actually post the review.
What I do is, I accept one GAN, and the focus on it until I have a review posted. Then I put it on hold. Once the first one is one hold, then I start another. I may have 4 or 5 open at once, but I'll only have 1 that's waiting for an initial review. See what I mean? So that's what I'd recommend.
Anyway, thank for helping with the GAN backlog! All the best, – Quadell (talk) 14:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
The Reviewer Barnstar | ||
For your brilliant display at Vedaranyam March GAN —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC) |
When I nominate these GANs, I don't plan for them all to be reviewed at the same time. It is going to take me a while to get to all of your issues.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Hey Seabuckthorn, which of the GA review templates do you use to generate that great setup such as you used on Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971? I like it, would like to swipe it if I knew which one it was and how to make it "go". Montanabw(talk) 01:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
The Reviewer Barnstar | ||
Some of your recent reviews have been unlike any I have seen before. You have really dotted the is and crossed the ts. You are helping me to improve the project with these types of reviews. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks for your review at Talk:Parliamentary Monitoring Services/GA1, I've responded at the subpage.
Cheers,
— Cirt (talk) 04:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Frank Underwood (House of Cards), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
You should also comment at Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations#query.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for this comment, I hadn't noticed it before!
Most appreciated!
Cheers,
— Cirt (talk) 04:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello there. Thank you for agreeing to take on the review of Velodona. I've looked over some of your reviews, and you seem exceedingly thorough. I'll be interested in hearing your feedback. Some of the sources are, unfortunately, behind a paywall. If you would like for me to send them to you so that you can do a copyvio check, shoot me an email, and I will attach them in a reply email. Please note that I am in Eastern Standard Time (UTC -5), so while it's half an hour before noon where you live, it's an hour after midnight where I live. Cheers, Sven Manguard Wha? 05:57, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your helpful suggestions at Talk:Bomis/GA1. I've gone ahead and went through them and modified the article accordingly. Perhaps you could reevaluate at Talk:Bomis/GA1. Thank you for your time, — Cirt (talk) 00:10, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks once more for taking the time to thoroughly review the two articles I nominated. :) Lemonade51 (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2014 (UTC)