This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Good Article Barnstar | ||
Ruby2010, I hereby award you The Good Article Barnstar for your thorough and comprehensive review of Joshua Soule Zimmerman. Because of your careful guidance and patience, this article now meets Good Article criteria. Thank you! -- Caponer (talk) 03:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC) |
Hi. Hope you're well. Just to let you know that I've sorted your comments on the FLC. Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Tom Cruise filmography/archive1. Anything else you can think of that could improve it? Cowlibob (talk) 10:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
On 1 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frances Jocelyn, Viscountess Jocelyn, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the collages of the Victorian photographer Lady Jocelyn (pictured) were said to have "subverted the realistic nature of photography"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frances Jocelyn, Viscountess Jocelyn. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello My name is Abigail and I am a student at American University I am taking a course about Wikipedia and Public Knowledge and am completely inexperienced when it comes to editing. I am attempting to edit pages as part of the Wikiproject, Women Authors. I just edited the page for Frankenstein and was wondering if you had any helpful tips. thanks so much
3143628a (talk) 03:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! :) Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
I have reviewed this and have some comments/concerns, which are expounded both in the DYK template & at greater length on the article talk page. I hope to get around to reviewing the list of works later today, but at this rate it might be tomorrow. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Hey, I'm resuming work on my Operation Lost project. I'm working on White Rabbit now and am having trouble finding production information– I can't find any commentaries or other production tidbits that aren't already there. I was wondering if you knew anything. Pinging @Igordebraga: because I know they were working on Lost articles too. Thanks in advance. -Newyorkadam (talk) 06:16, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Newyorkadam
How to pick up more women... | |
Hello! Victuallers and I have developed a proposal for a talk to be presented at Wikimania 2015. It's titled, How to pick up more women... -- as in more women editors and more women's biographies. Examples include the Edit-a-thon blitz during WikiWomen's History Month and the "new articles" work underway by WikiProject Women Writers. The Wikimania talk proposal review process has begun and there's no guarantee that this proposal will be accepted. That's where you come in. Please review our proposal and give us feedback. Ultimately, we hope you add your name to the signup at the bottom of the proposal which signifies you'd be interested in the talk if you were attending it (it does not commit you to attending Wikimania). Thank you! Rosiestep (talk) 22:33, 22 February 2015 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of works by Georgette Heyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Corinthian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Freikorp (submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Godot13 (submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.
In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:
You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email)
Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.
(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Congrats on the list's promotion! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
In the area? You're invited to the | |
Art+Feminism meetup | |
Date: Sunday, March 8, 2015 | |
Time: 12:00 - 4:00pm | |
Place: Walker Art Center | |
Hi Ruby. I hope you can join us at the Walker this Sunday. By the way, I don't know if you work much on pre-Victorian women writers, but the Wikipedia Library is now offering accounts with the Women Writers Online database. gobonobo + c 09:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
On 10 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of works by Georgette Heyer, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the works of Georgette Heyer include her first novel The Black Moth (1921), which she based on a story she wrote for her haemophiliac younger brother? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of works by Georgette Heyer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
On 10 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Black Moth, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the works of Georgette Heyer include her first novel The Black Moth (1921), which she based on a story she wrote for her haemophiliac younger brother? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Persuasion (1995 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WGBH. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, this is just a quick note to make you aware of the current deletion discussion for the ((Maintained)) talk page template which you have used on some article's talk pages. Cheers! Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 19:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
.
Hello! Your submission of Cathleen Mann at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SusunW (talk) 21:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Ruby2010, great job on expanding it. Saved me all that time and work hah! :) Lapadite (talk) 09:05, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
On 2 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cathleen Mann, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the British portrait artist Cathleen Mann was also a peeress and film costume designer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cathleen Mann. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:01, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the April drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 03:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
On 4 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alexandra Byrne, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that costume designer Alexandra Byrne, who won an Academy Award for Elizabeth: The Golden Age, said of Thor's costumes, "it's all about his arms"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alexandra Byrne. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
The article Raised by Another you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Raised by Another for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 16:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
On 25 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jane Spencer, Baroness Churchill, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Jane Spencer, Baroness Churchill, the longest serving member of Queen Victoria's personal household, predeceased the monarch by one month? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jane Spencer, Baroness Churchill. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 07:48, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Ruby. I'm just posting to let you know that List of colleges and universities in North Dakota – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for May 18. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello!
You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was Cas Liber (submissions) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.
Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.
The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) 16:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello!
You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Georgiana Howard, Countess of Carlisle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Oh, I'm sorry to raise a footling query about the length of the hook. Everything else seems fine. I hope it can be sorted out easily. Best wishes. Thincat (talk) 20:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
On 26 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Georgiana Howard, Countess of Carlisle, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Duchess of Devonshire refused to employ a wet nurse for her eldest child Lady Georgiana Cavendish, an unusual decision for an upperclass woman in that era? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Georgiana Howard, Countess of Carlisle. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 07:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
I actually still exist even though I haven't really edited in over a year. There was just too much to do at once and I was overwhelmed and moved on to other writing projects. Still, who knows, if I get a lot of sources for something I might come back. Regardless, I started watching Fringe a couple of weeks ago and I'm on the second season and I'm really enjoying it :) Hope you're having a great time Glimmer721 talk 22:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
On 31 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lady Charlotte Finch, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Lady Charlotte Finch served as royal governess to the children of King George III for over 30 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lady Charlotte Finch. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey Ruby2010: it occured to me that you might be a really good fit for the Wikipedia Library's account coordination volunteer team, because you have been a really strong contributor and really good at interacting with other users! Account coordination only requires a limited amount of time (a few hours a week at peak time), helping screen and approved editors for one (or two) of our donations at WP:TWL/Journals. Its a relatively limited amount of time per month. Would you be interested? Check out our application at Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library/Coordinators/Signup, Sadads (talk) 23:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Welcome, glad you joined! As you can see, the project is only a couple of days old, so any policy and guideline fleshing out that you'd like to do, please feel free. Or if you want to discuss first, that's cool too! How did you hear about it? I'm trying to get the word out, so if you know of anyone else who'd be interested, let them know. We also have a user box: ((User WikiProject Romance)). I used to be very active on WP back in 2006, but am a little rusty and might not be as up-to-date as I used to be on policy (I used to be an admin) plange (talk) 02:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the June drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 04:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lady Charlotte Finch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 08:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
The article Lady Charlotte Finch you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lady Charlotte Finch for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 08:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Well, I just got addicted to editing again, and for a change I've been working on A.S. King, an author I've read a lot of recently. However, I don't think I've really edited biographical articles before. I haven't added all that I could, but in terms of the structure I'm beginning to hit a roadblock. Her books have just garnered so many awards and recognitions (including end-of-year lists, as well as starred reviews which haven't even been mentioned yet), and the list on the page is already long and outdated, missing her most recent books, but none of her novels have their own pages (yet...). Is there a better way to categorize that? By book or by year? (My template skills were never the best and now they're especially rusty, considering I couldn't do my old cite web properly.) Along those lines, I'm also not sure how much I should include on critical reception; I assume that isn't necessary on this sort of article, but the books don't have individual pages. (Also I'm nearing the final stretch of season 3 now...it's so addicting.) Glimmer721 talk 18:14, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
On 10 June 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sense and Sensibility (soundtrack), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Patrick Doyle received his first Academy Award and BAFTA nominations for composing the musical score to Sense and Sensibility, written by and starring his friend Emma Thompson? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sense and Sensibility (soundtrack). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:39, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Fringe 6955 kHz.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Fringe Amber 31422.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
The article Lady Charlotte Finch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lady Charlotte Finch for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 07:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
The Good Article Barnstar | ||
For your contributions to bring Lady Charlotte Finch to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! — Calvin999 07:44, 12 June 2015 (UTC) |
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Just saw you created a page for Lord of Scoundrels-- can't believe WP didn't have it already! Just wanted to drop a note to say that the article is looking fantastic! Are you going to do a GA nom? plange (talk) 04:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lord of Scoundrels you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 12:01, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
The article Lord of Scoundrels you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lord of Scoundrels for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 12:41, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
On 20 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Girl with a Pearl Earring (soundtrack), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Alexandre Desplat's musical score to the 2003 film Girl with a Pearl Earring raised his international profile and led to a career composing major productions like The King's Speech? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Girl with a Pearl Earring (soundtrack). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Fringe Bishop Revival.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 15:00, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Ruby2010,
You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Past Masters through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. If you would prefer to contact me directly about your experience with this resource, please leave a message on my talk page.
Thank you, Wikipedia Library Past Masters account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 12:53, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Ruby, I hope this finds you well. You may remember that when I peer reviewed Persuasion, I mentioned that I had a similar article (a BBC costume drama TV film adaptation of a classic novel- even with some cast crossover!) heading FA-wards- well, The Turn of the Screw has now been nominated at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Turn of the Screw (2009 film)/archive1. If you get a chance (but no pressure!) I'd appreciate any feedback you might have. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:30, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
On 18 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lord of Scoundrels, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Regency romance novel Lord of Scoundrels is a retelling of the fairytale Beauty and the Beast? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lord of Scoundrels. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 06:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
On 31 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lady's Magazine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in one Lady's Magazine article printed in June 1775, a male doctor writes that women with red hair have "generally become the best breeders of the nation"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lady's Magazine. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:47, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shane Taylor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shinobido. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.
In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far Casliber (submissions) in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was Coemgenus (submissions) at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.
The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:
The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.
Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!
Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 11:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in Women in Red and for your participation in the virtual Women in Leadership Edit-a-thon, 7-20 September 2015. It was a resounding success with over 160 new articles. Your contributions are appreciated! We'll keep you posted on future events. --Ipigott (talk) 09:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
You are invited! Join us remotely! | |
---|---|
|
Minneapolis Institute of Art edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
|
WikiCup 2015 is now in the books! Congrats to our finalists and winners, and to everyone who took part in this year's competition.
This year's results were an exact replica of last year's competition. For the second year in a row, the 2015 WikiCup champion is Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points). All of his points were earned for an impressive 253 featured pictures and their associated bonus points (5060 and 1695, respectively). His entries constituted scans of currency from all over the world and scans of medallions awarded to participants of the U.S. Space program. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came in second place; she earned by far the most bonus points (4082), for 4 featured articles, 15 good articles, and 147 DYKs, mostly about in her field of expertise, natural science. Cas Liber (submissions), a finalist every year since 2010, came in third, with 2379 points.
Our newcomer award, presented to the best-performing new competitor in the WikiCup, goes to Rationalobserver (submissions). Everyone should be very proud of the work they accomplished. We will announce our other award winners soon.
A full list of our award winners are:
We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2016 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · logs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · logs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · logs) 18:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Katherine, Anya Seton 2006 edition novel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.
After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.
We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.
The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.
If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)