![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
For what reason are you systematically removing relevant information links from as many TDs as you can find? In what way, for example, is a link to a page containing Eamon Ryan's recent activity in the Dail "spam"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Handelaar (talk • contribs) 17:45, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
(Declared interest: the links you are removing are to a site I built, but I'm not responsible for the links being added)
Handelaar (talk) 17:46, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
What would be considered a reliable source for something like this? Do I have to wait for THQ or Yuke's to acknowledge there is a glaring hole in their game? If this is the case that will not happen until they patch it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpate86 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi! I've discussed the matter with PhilKnight, and we agree that the best way to proceed with the Shell to Sea mediation is probably to file a new request for mediation at the formal Mediation Committee's page, for the following reasons:
I hope, and I'm sure PhilKnight agrees, that this will help resolve all disputes regarding the articles. Thanks. — Twinzor Say hi! 21:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Honestly, do you do anything other than sit on your computer all day and go through the same pages and undo what other people have added?
Dude, sort yourself out, why the hell are you reverting my roster?! These are all confimred fighters, goddamnit! It's this sort of nonsense that totally screws up this website in the first place! What the fuck is the problem!
List of indiscriminate information? Look, I'm not stupid or anything, but all I'm saying is the fighters are all there on IGN, every one, you can look if you like. I don't really care if it's split into the different weight categories or not, but either way I have no idea why you'd leave this out! What does it acheive?! The FNR3 article is bull*** anyway —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.240.166.44 (talk) 21:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Just Cause 2 worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. A reliable source has the image listed (Amazon). TJ Spyke 21:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
While that policy makes some amount sense, can you source it somewhere on wikipedia? I ask because it isn't something which is being done on all pages. Thanks! UncannyGarlic (talk) 01:50, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Steve Crossin Talk/Help us mediate! 09:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Steve here is going to take up mediation on this case. I've tried to work things through but things seem to be coming to a head [1]. I think that another mediation case has to be set up, I don't know if you are in the process of doing this or should I. GainLine ♠♥ 09:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Grand, I'm actually heading to the match (Cusack Stand!) so I'm not going to be in a position to set anything up today and depending on the result, tomorrow either! I'm not sure about how to go about setting it up so I may be on to you. I should have maybe notified LP but I forgot, I've been trying to work things through but its hard work and now has reached the point where nothings being achieved. The comments on the Michael Dwyer thread were particularly unconstructive also. I think the fact I nominated the Mary Devins article for deletion may have brought about some ill will but this was just following instruction from the BLP noticeboard, I didn't think that would be the result. Good luck getting the ticket, oh and don't worry, I'm sure O'Connell can always ask for BODs advice on captaining the lions! ;) GainLine ♠♥ 10:31, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Cool, we'll see how it pans out, hopefully things just don't peter out like before. As regards the match, I'll let this do the talking for me:- [2]. Now to figure out how to wangle a ticket and somewhere to stay in Edinburgh from some Munster fan who's booked it last July..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by GainLine (talk • contribs)
Well that should be enough to shut the ladyboy comments up! Dont think anyone expected it, especially the Minster players! GainLine ♠♥ 13:03, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Cheers, see you in mediation GainLine ♠♥ 23:22, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
I've started mediation and brought up some topics if you would like to add your thoughts GainLine ♠ ♥ 16:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
This article is starting an endless edit war by anonymous Wikipedia users. It needs to be locked. Parrothead1983 (talk) 15:22, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Why did you remove all of the information on Forza 3? There are multiple claims of the same information throughout the Internet including credible magazines. It was nice for Wikipedia to also display the information since it is one of the first links that supplied the information in an orderly manner.--Jtsports92 (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Shell to Sea Fleet, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shell to Sea Fleet. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Smartse (talk) 01:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Steve Crossin Talk/Help us mediate! 22:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Keeley Hawes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. 82.132.136.209 (talk) 11:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for getting rid of the system requirements, I'm a bit stupid and deleted too much text. Went to revert it and fix it but well, I had a good 5 seconds to think. :P 22:05, 23 May 2009 69.81.154.218 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.81.154.218 (talk)
GainLine ♠ ♥ 22:23, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Once the clock went red the seconds seemed like minutes, Elsoms a beast! The Irish game is slightly less inspiring tho. GainLine ♠ ♥ 22:30, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Ah stop, Leinster had all the territory, would have been heartbreak. Think the poor old canucks are battered after the likes of Mushy beating them up. Stupider mistakes than my own J4 team would make going on. GainLine ♠ ♥ 22:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
No problem. When I first saw it last night as I was poking around the retail sites I thought it was fake, but as I watched the new trailer on the official site I saw it there, too. If you had pressed me, though, I would have acquiesced (I'm not a fighter on Mondays), so I guess it's fortunate I hit on a convincing argument. :) -- Commdor {Talk} 19:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
The official website for FNR4 gives a release date of June 30, 2009. CollisionCourse (talk) 10:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Why did you remove the car list? ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 14:45, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Because in the context that EA says the original release was a buggy pre-final version, it's relevant to mention the final version also has been leaked. And WP:N and WP:IDONTLIKE does apply, WP:N because it states the notability guideline applies to articles only, not to the information in them, and since you talked about it being not notable... WP:IDONTLIKEIT because no policy states it shouldn't be included. --MrStalker (talk) 19:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
I just reverted the citation you put in because it wasn't typed up properly. Base the coding on one of the other references in the article. If you're not sure how to do that, tell me and I'll fix it tomorrow when I have access to the unblocked site. --Thejadefalcon (talk) 11:26, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
No worries! seemed like the thing to do! GainLine ♠ ♥ 19:13, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Please add that it is uncited information as opposed to removing the section entirely. Or reword the section as you see fit. Please stop removing it entirely.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpate86 (talk • contribs)
Hi, would you mind waiting until the official announcements before updating the by-election results? We do have some standards here! Snappy (talk) 12:44, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
My edits were not vandalism. The UK election results are not yet in. You can watch them being read out here as they come: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8085850.stm
In the meantime, please stop making unconstructive edits to the election results page. 83.226.206.82 (talk) 00:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I was not aware of that policy. I considered it a very relevant site, but shall leave as is for now. Take care! --~FA~ (talk) 16:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
The "slang" phrase is used in daily speech in Ireland. Anyone who is not Irish would be able to look up the term here and understand it. I know The Register forum is an unusual source but it is a term that you will hear in conversation but seldom see written anywhere. What is one to do? You can't have trivia sections anymore because delitionistas want to delete anything actually interesting. Albatross2147 (talk) 13:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Royalbroil 11:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mister Slimm (talk • contribs) 23:45, 24 June 2009
Repeated removal of relevant information from Ferrari Challenge Trofeo Pirelli. Your blanking of information is not limited to this topic and seems to apply to a number of racing video game pages. Please only remove / change incorrect information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mister Slimm (talk • contribs) 23:45, 24 June 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on SSX 3. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Toddst1 (talk) 00:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
Mister Slimm (talk) 11:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |