Might I have the first word on my talk page? Occurring (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Occurring. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is located here. Thank you. LuckyLouie (talk) 22:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above hyperlink labeled here misdirects, since the webpage is now archived. As one can see, the whole case against was vague, terse accusations that I carefully rebutted, but that the accusers themselves did not follow up on. — Occurring (talk) 21:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at James H. Fetzer‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Whether or not your edits are constructive, you've repeatedly reinserted the same controversial statements and deleted the same uncontroversial statements. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 18:31, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sincerely and respectfully, I ask that you specify which controversial statements I allegedly repeatedly reinserted as well as which uncontroversial statements I allegedly repeatedly deleted. If the accusation is accurate, it must be with reference to specific statements. Indeed, your accusation arrives with categorical certainty. I ask because I suspect that you are confused, and that perhaps I am not guilty of what you allege — Occurring (talk) 20:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James H. Fetzer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fellowship and JAMA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Deductive-nomological model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Cytology, Dynamics, QCD, A priori, Electromagnetic, Reference frame, Electron orbitals, Thomas Young, Newtonian and Rockefeller Institute

James H. Fetzer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Fellowship and JAMA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deductive-nomological model, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages QFT and Path integrals (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Arsanilic acid may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *Nadav Davidovitch & Zalman Greenberg, [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17518312 "Public Health, Culture, and Colonial Medicine:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:47, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Psychokinesis. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.   — Jess· Δ♥ 16:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please, practice what you preach and stop lying about me on the talkpage, then. In one of my posts, I explained your errors—misread your own citation—but you flatly stated that you refused to even read past he first sentence. Then you proceed to lie and lie about me, and lie about your own citations. Please, use the talkpage to discuss the topic, not play shenanigans while lying about me. — Occurring (talk) 17:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Theodore Roosevelt High School (New York City) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• New York|Bronx]]. On 10 January 1919, four days after [[President Theodore Roosevelt]]'s death]], the school's name was changed to the Theodore Roosevelt High School.<ref name=School1920/> New

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:16, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Theodore Roosevelt High School (New York City), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Republican party and Doubleday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wesley C. Salmon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Incommensurability (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have a tendency to change the date formats from MDY to DMY on many articles that involve American people and subjects. You should read WP:STRONGNAT and WP:RETAIN. American topics should use the natural American date format of MDY.--JOJ ^Hutton 01:45, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Meanwhile, have you noticed anything valuable about my tendencies? Occurring (talk) 07:27, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fundamental interaction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Newton

Fundamental science (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Worrall

Natural science (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Newton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

James H. Fetzer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Do you have any possible conflict of interest with the subject of that article?

jps (talk) 02:28, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for asking respectfully. I have absolutely none. As I explained elsewhere, my main interests are theoretical science and philosophy of science. I am just disgusted by the Fetzer article being the victim, all over conspiracy theories, of Fetzer followers versus Fetzer opponents and vice versa. I probably have the very least conflict of sympathy, at least. Occurring (talk) 02:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if Fetzer is notable for his mainstream achievements. This is rather hard for me to judge. The article could, perhaps, be deleted unless we somehow think he qualifies for a WP:FRINGEBLP. I would help you form an appropriate nomination if you think his biography should be removed. jps (talk) 03:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How can anyone "wonder if Fetzer is notable for his mainstream achievements"? I have published 29 books on computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science and evolution and morality beyond my work in the philosophy of science, where I have clarified and illuminated the nature of laws, the structure of explanations, the principle of inference to the best explanation and the contributions of Carl G. Hempel with two books from Oxford, one a new collection of Hempel's papers, the other a collection of new studies of Hempel's work. My first paper in computer science on program verification ignited an international controversy that reverberates to this day. I received the Medal of the University of Helsinki for my work in the philosophy of science and was selected to be a Distinguished McKnight University Professor by the University of Minnesota, where to this date (to the best of my knowledge) I am the only faculty member not teaching on the Twin Cities campus to have received that distinction.

What I find outrageous is that you have allowed my entry to be butchered, apparently by one Andrew Philip Cross, who may be an expert on music and jazz but looks like a partisan hack in his tweets and blog posts and such. It is completely disgusting that the major contributions I have made to the study of the assassination of JFK, the death of Senator Paul Wellstone, 9/11, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing should be pitched with no consideration for their significance. I founded Scholars for 9/11 Truth and was the person who put 9/11 on the public map. There was a flat line for discussion of 9/11 before I founded Scholars, after which it began to climb and climb, culminating with The American Scholars Conference in 2006. I organized the first national conference for Scholars in Madison 2007, edited its first book, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007) and organized its first international conference in Vancouver 2012. And I assisted Stephen Francis in organizing The Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference in Urbana, IL 2013.

I have been the most outspoken critic of the views of Steve Jones and A&E911, where my presentation at The Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference offered a severe critique of its approach, explaining that the WTC was destroyed by nukes and that all four of the 9/11 crash sites appear to have been faked. This is enormously important, because if none of those planes crashed, then none of the passengers abroad them died in crashes that did not take place and there were no "suicide hijackers" who caused them to crash. In addition I again assisted Stephen Francis in organizing The Academic Freedom Conference: Are there limits to inquiry?, taking JFK, 9/11 and the Holocaust as the prime examples of subjects that are treated gingerly by the academy, but which deserve to be taught, studied and dissected. I have given over 1,000 interviews on these subjects, where, I would suggest, if my work as a conspiracy analyst is not worthy of inclusion, then Wikipedia should drop the pretense of being a valuable resource. Your vaunted standards of objectivity and neutrality of viewpoint are mocked by allowing an unqualified zealot to trash an entry on these subjects as important as this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by James H. Fetzer, McKnight Professor Emeritus 24.159.240.214 (talk) 06:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Instrumentalism, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eudoxus and QM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CBGB, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Village (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I read with some knowing amusement your Feb 2014 PK talk page logical attempt to reason with the gang of skeptically dogmatic editors now running that article. For years, I was a major contributor, but I quit the article in disgust, as explained here. The very reasonable change you wanted to make in the intro regarding the biased line There is no scientific evidence that psychokinesis is a real phenomenon. used to read more neutrally (on the day I quit and prior) Most scientists believe that the existence of psychokinesis has not been convincingly demonstrated. You can see the article back then archived Nov 26 2013 here. Except for the video link, I am the editor who provided all the photos used in the article as of that date. Note that there was back then a prominent mention with photo of Nobel laureate Brian Josephson's position on PK and quantum mechanics. He is gone totally from the article now as well as many other witnesses on the pro side. Don't even waste your time on the article. The skeptic gang running it (see my talk page post link for evidence of that) are not even aware that they're biased attitude means the utter end of the skeptical movement if PK is ever convincingly proven. The gang will quickly attempt a cover-up and remove all the embarassing anti-material and try to jump on the pro-bandwagon, but it won't work. I'm not looking to start a discussion here, as I don't log in to Wikipedia frequently any more, but you sounded extremely intelligent and logical in your Feb 2014 PK talk page posts, so I just wanted to fill you in on a little history of that article. 5Q5 (talk) 18:39, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rudy Giuliani may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Kingdom's [[Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom|Queen Elizabeth II]].<ref>Stephen M Silverman, [http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,623496,00.html "Queen Elizabeth knights Rudy Giuliani—Queen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CBGB, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matinee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Theodore Roosevelt High School (New York City), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Larry Davis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Focal infection theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clinical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muscle dysmorphia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Press. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Focal infection theory page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Occurring. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Beverly Hills Hotel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Hamilton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33

Your recent editing history at Jack the Ripper shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay (talk) 10:36, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Occurring. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Occurring. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theodore Roosevelt High School (New York City), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theodore Roosevelt High School (New York City), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bitches Ain't Shit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scribner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:51, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you object to the changes made to this article by me, please start a discussion on the talk page, and do not revert them again. Just a reminder, you do not OWN the article, despite the tremendous amount of work you've put into it. Also, as there are now free photos of the school, you can no loner use the non-free photo, per WP:NFCC. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:45, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NYC Dept Ed panoramic photo Theodore Roosevelt HS building Jun 2004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Larry Davis (born 1966), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sambo and Rambo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Occuring, I have recently seen your edit on the Tupac Shakur article. From reading your changes to it, among other articles that you have made changes to, it is quite evident that you have a very unorthodox type of writing (probably the most unorthodox writing I have ever come across to be honest). Whether English is your first language or not, I would hope that you could read other good articles to take influence from or learn how to write in a more appropriate way because your near enough incomprehensible style of writing is not fitting with how other areas of information are written. Isaacsorry (talk) 13:54, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Occuring,

I made edits to follow Wikipedia:MOS as well as linking to common words. You went and undid those changes and stated that you do not understand what some words mean so you re-linked them. That is not the proper way to do that. You must use a dictionary. It appears that maybe English is not your primary language, however, this is the English Wikipedia and we have words that do not get linked nor do we link to other articles within Wikipedia for those words.

Thanks, Bakertheacre ^Chat/_{What I Baked} 04:55, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]