You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  – Muboshgu (talk) 14:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

November Sei (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am very sorry for those bad edits to those talk pages. I guess I thought it wouldn't hurt anything if I did that. Can I have another chance to edit wikipedia please? I'll stay off the talk pages of articles and mainly work on fixing grammar in the articles themselves like I did in my first few edits here. November Sei (talk) 19:44, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I will go out on a limb and give you another chance. Please make good use of it. Be advised that you will likely be reblocked should the inappropriate behavior recur. 331dot (talk) 20:36, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Using article talk pages is an integral part of Wikipedia editing, as if your edits are disputed a discussion would need to be started about them, which would require your participation. For what reason did you decide to go off the rails and post such inappropriate postings(which are inappropriate in any public area, not just here), and how can we be assured that you will not do so again? 331dot (talk) 20:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I got curious as to what would happen I I did that, which I know is a very bad reason. But I understand now that those kinds of things do not belong on Wikipedia at all, and I promise never to post anything like that ever again here. November Sei (talk) 20:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What happens when you edit disruptively is that you get blocked. Especially since in this case, it didn't seem you had any intent to edit In any constructive way. The first few edits you made to Wikipedia were innocuous, and then you started writing "Hi fuckers" and something worse that I won't repeat on top pages. If the admin reviewing the unblock request decides to be generous and give you a second chance, I hope you make the best use of it. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:29, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I definitely can see the consequences of my "curiosity" and bad decisions. And if I am given a second chance, I will definitely only make useful edits here. November Sei (talk) 20:32, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See also the ongoing sockpuppet investigation case here: w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Skiyomi. theinstantmatrix (talk) 22:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I thought my troubles here were over. Does this mean I might be blocked again? @Theinstantmatrix: November Sei (talk) 23:46, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That depends. Is Skyomi your account? Have you used other accounts? I strongly suggest that you be honest. You don't need to answer me here, but you should on the SPI. 331dot (talk) 00:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have given my full reply on the SPI. But yes, that is my account. November Sei (talk) 00:32, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]