![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() Archives • ℹ | |
---|---|
1. 02/06 - 05/06 |
9. 05/07 - early 08/07 |
Sorry, it kind of got out of hand. But, the debate is over, because I found a Centralized Discussion about TV show formats, and technically both of good. We are currently working on a middle ground for the Smallville pages. Sorry that it got out of hand on "your" page. Bignole 01:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
The thing I put in my edit summary was ripped from bash.org —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Triikan (talk • contribs) .
I wish you wouldn't relink the Smallville LOE page. There is an ongoing discussion over whether season pages or individual episode pages should be used here. Could you please revert your edit? Thanks. - Peregrinefisher 23:50, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Please do not make invalid warnings against me. I will not sit here and be abused. -- Selmo (talk) 00:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
So what if the organization's Wikipedia page was deleted.. I guess nothing they do, even if covered by the major media, is "notable" in your eyes. And yes, the Wikiality was second place, however a quick Google News search shows most news stories are touting it along side Truthiness as "Co-Words" of the year.
Anyways I can tell from your condescending tone on my talk page that you're pretty defensive regarding that article so I'll leave it alone, even though your explanation that articles aren't created on significance pretty much destroyed your whole argument on how wikiality is too insignificant to have an article LOL --Frantik 06:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Okeydoke, thanks! -th1rt3en 06:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
I saw the message. Yes it was mass released, but it would have been the same had I written each out individually (minus a couple words). It isn't my intent to belittle, because we are all ignorant of most of Wiki's policies, guidelines, rules, etc. My intention is to enlighten other Television articles as to the proper way to create an episode page. Extended plots is a no-no regardless, it says "you don't have to watch it, just read it here". It's part of the "what Wikipedia is not". That is my biggest problem with all those pages, along with other things like unreferenced material that is just sitting there untouched because fans created the page and no one is bothering to care about it. If I had the time and resources I would do it myself, but I don't. That is why I sent out a generic message for those that regularly monitor the pages to take the initiative and correct the pages. That's where I left it, it's up to them to do something. Bignole 13:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your response on my Talk Page. Though, I have one more question that recently popped into my mind. Like you Wikipedians who have already signed up and created your own crafty userpage, as an anon, am I able to create my own user page, or would I get in trouble (if it's illegal)? 65.8.35.224 22:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Many Naruto episodes can be found at Youtube. Should we put links to the episode video at the articles about it? The Gerg 17:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Search results of Naruto Episodes at YouTube.
If you are willing to adjust the individual episode pages, will you help me find a place for them? Also, can you give me a link to where it says what quotes are and aren't OK in an idividual episode page? - Peregrinefisher 07:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
I apologize, I just thought that, as an anime series, it should be in the designated anime format. It has worked for many series before (see: List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes, List of Oh My Goddess episodes). Also, I find it more aestheticly pleasing when the kanji titles are present. I wish to discuss this further so that we may come to a reasonable conclusion, please respond at the Talk:List of Lady Oscar episodes page.
- ChibiViqor 09/14/06
Please explain why you changed spoiler redirects into hard redirects without bringing it up on any talk pages. —Keenan Pepper 04:02, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
With regards to your comments on Talk:Fire + Water: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. —Wknight94 (talk) 23:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
I've provided a source, and you stated that if I provided a source, you would retract your vote to delete. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
...am I correct in assuming this is the same Ned Scott that I knew oh so many moons ago in #ev?
(if not... uh, nevermind) EVula 19:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
I apologize for addign the templates, I thought you were referring to them all, as you never said which ones you were proposing. To make up for it, I proposed sort of the same thing, leaving out Squareenix, as I disagree with that one. --PresN 06:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
I reverted Template:Episode list because the table wasn't showing up properly. I would appreciate if you would take a look at it and make sure I didn't screw anything up. It was your edit [2] that did it. It may just be MY browser of something though. - Peregrinefisher 02:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
WHY are you editting my talk page? i consider it vandalsim. A person has ALL the rights to delete comments and messages on his OWN user poage and TALK PAGE-
i had EVEN requested and RECEIVED my own Wikipedia advocate to resolve this issue-
PLEASE do NOT try to restart this dipute once again especially AFTER its already been resolved!!! --Too Cool 08:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello.
You have nominated the SnowBotamon article for speedy deletion. I realize you are doing it so the YukimiBotamon page can be moved. But i already did the move manually (i moved content from YukimiBotamon to SnowBotamon, and turned YukimiBotamon into a redirect for SnowBotamon.
I'm just a bit confused about the point in deleting SnowBotamon then? When YukimiBotamon is going to be moved to SnowBotamon anyway after the delete?
Saintmagician 07:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Hey, if you're still online, can you help me with something? I have a *very* wierd problem. This page Musyamon doesn't seem to exist for me.
When i go there, (whether by a URL edit, or through the search function, or through a link), i get the "Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Musyamon...." etc message.
However, i can view the article's discussion page and history pages; links to Musyamon do appear in blue (not red) on other articles. Even wierder, i can click the "edit this page" button, and i can see what's supposed to be on the article (as in all the Musyamon information). I can even use the "show preview" button in "edit this page" to view the page as it should be.
But the Musyamon article page itself just doesn't appear for me. It keeps giving me the "Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Musyamon in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings."
I've tried clearing browser history and using ctrl+F5. And i just can't seem to see the page. I don't suppose you've ever encountered something like this before and know why it's happening?
Thanks you. Saintmagician 08:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Well spotted. He's been permamently blocked. However he seems to know how Wikipedia operates and uses the Popups tools to perpetuate his vandalism which is worrying. I'd imagine he'll be back in another guise. Ben W Bell talk 10:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
So official info from the Anime does violate the rules, while fake info like Mikemon evolving to Bastemon ( which was made up and has not been proven by any official sources ) or the existence of DarkGatomon X ( another madeup with the power of Hentai ) doesn´t ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.137.237.25 (talk • contribs) .
That was it ? Simply using "she proves her power" ? I wouldn´t have minded if only that was removed.
Also its my talk page stop reverting it its not right if i want it deleted you have no right to that IS being a VANDAL so stop.
I am correct for both occasions. I reverted it back to what i said. I have both cards and the detail for SL was in depth with proof. If you have an issue don't screw with what i wrote its correct and what did i do to you? bad faith?Wk21030 22:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Please explain to me how that particular section qualifies as "Original Research". All it does is describe some obvious fictional references encountered in the game, and other obvious main themes such as conspiracies and nanotechnology. It is perfectly obvious to anyone playing the game that that is true. It is about equivalent to someone saying that "Hell" is one of the main themes of Doom in its article. Please reply on my talk page. Thanks for your help. -- Grandpafootsoldier 02:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Do not touch my user page again this is your last warning.
I do not want anything on there. That needs to be stopped you shouldn't be able to edit peoples pages.
Be bold is a prinicble in Wikipedia where if you can't seem to get your contribution to fit all the rules of Wikipedia then should ignore some of the rules providing you can explain why.
In this case because of the sheer senstivity of the CCS article group i think it is necceary to show both title screens. That way all of the English speaking regions that it has broadcasted in will have been covered, ergo removing bias.
Also there has been proof of where the image came from, failing that, i have a copy and it came from CCR. -Dynamo_ace Talk
I've been remvoving style="width:98%;", width=150|, width="120"|, etc. from the list pages because the tables aren't showing up right for me. I did it about 20 times and it made me wonder if they're in there for a reason, future compatability or something. Are they? Also, why does ProdCode need to be removed when it isn't used? - Peregrinefisher 20:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
I don't care who you are you do not touch my page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wk21030 (talk • contribs) .
Don't forget to stay cool and be civil at all times, even when the Wikistress gets hot. Provoking other users, regardless of who is "right" or "wrong," is probably a bad idea.
Ginkgo100 talk · e@ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding ((subst:smile)), ((subst:smile2)) or ((subst:smile3)) to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
--Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 23:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)