Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 01:47, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not alter talk page warnings. Doing so is considered vandalism.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 01:53, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These two edits done under your account were considered vandalism: 1 & 2. Your account might have been possibly compromised. Be careful with your online passwords, hopefully the vandalism will not occur again.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 19:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mehicdino! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 13:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Frequently asked questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Building consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

==language "issue"==

Please read the talk page of the Eurovision article before making further changes, thanks --Dzordzm 07:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you think an article should be deleted, you can go through the process explained at WP:AFD. If you give your argument in terms of the pages at WP:N and/or WP:ATT, you will get more people to agree. If you think an article is inappropriately named, you can either move it yourself (using the "move" tab at the top of every page) or you can follow the process explained at WP:RM. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing the genre on the Avenged Sevenfold Wiki page. It's been agreed in the past that we label the band as a hard rock and heavy metal band. --BoaDrummer 21:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• AGAIN, PLEASE refrain from changing the A7X genre. It's been discussed as to what the page is listed as. --BoaDrummer 00:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Pal, this is getting old. Please do not change the genre on the Avenged Sevenfold page anymore. It's been agreed up on what genre they fall under, namely hard rock and heavy metal. Please leave it as it is or I'll be reporting you. --BoaDrummer 21:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Discuss your issues on the article talk page. One more revert and I'll be forced to block you for violating the 3-revert rule. Edit-warring is not going to accomplish your goal. MastCell ^Talk 02:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for edit-warring

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule on Avenged Sevenfold. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text ((unblock|your reason here)) below. MastCell ^Talk 17:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Children of Bodom. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.

If you revert the edits by Skeeker or any other user that provide citations you will be reported and blocked. Consensus has been reached on the Children of Bodom talk page regarding Children of Bodom's genre and it would be wise if you would visit the page. Also please don't attack other users as you did to Skeeker on your revert summary, if you continue you can be blocked for this as well. --Leon Sword 03:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mehicdino, I recently noticed you used "stupidity amazes me" as your edit summary when reverting User:Kunak. You were right in reverting that user, but your edit summary was uncalled for and is in violation of WP:CIVIL. Please be more civil. I have already warned you before about attacking other users, and I repeat, you can be blocked for this kind of behavior. --Leon Sword 18:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]