This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 |
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Islam in the Arctic into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., struck per clarification below Sennecaster (What now?) 10:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Please try to merge in as little diffs as possible, and to link to the page you are. We understand it's from the AfD, but it does not satisfy the GFDL. Sennecaster (What now?) 02:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
You reviewed this article ten seconds after I uploaded it. Is this some sort of Wikipedia world record? Keep up the great work. Roundtheworld (talk) 08:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Hola. You moved Battle of Kangra to draft yesterday, the user has just banged it back into mainspace. It's clearly not up to par - what's the next move here? Surely not AfD? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:11, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
How can this tag be applied despite the source of so many news articles?... Now I have added ten links to it again... Can you remove that tag now? PA12194 (talk) 06:41, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
I'm talking about this Wikipedia page 👇
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umashankar_Singh_(Mojo) PA12194 (talk) 08:47, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
I will not say the source of the award at all... I am talking to you about the news link covered by the people of the National Newspaper... ,👇
👉https://www.financialexpress.com/archive/stories-behind-the-story/448605/.
👉https://indianexpress.com/article/news-archive/print/stories-behind-the-stories/
PA12194 (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
When this journalist covers the news, it is the kind of news that is mentioned as author in the news👉https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bihar-assembly-elections-2020-chirag-pawan-to-ndtv-nitish-kumar-doesnt-listen-to-colleagues-2305683 PA12194 (talk) 09:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
What is the rule in Wikipedia? When a journalist makes news of another journalist in another news channel, its source does not run on Wikipedia? PA12194 (talk) 09:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Above are two of the national newspapers in India that I have given you... In it, those people have made the news of this journalist... And it's weird that it doesn't run on Wikipedia as a source, sir... PA12194 (talk) 10:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want examples of articles on journalists that do demonstrate notability, have a look at Sudhir Chaudhary (journalist) or Madhu Trehan. Mccapra (talk) 10:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Send me a link to any one of the journalists in India and an example honey to show me the link that his name is fully mentioned in the news... I will try to find a news article and add it to Wikipedia based on the example you show. PA12194 (talk) 10:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Okay sir 👍 PA12194 (talk) 10:25, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your work. Please note my edit fixing up some easy things that will save us a lot of work if you could take them onboard. Tony (talk) 05:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
When recently reviewing a redirect to Marius Cocioran, you have reset to a wrong version of his second name: his second name is: Marius Iulian Cocioran (correct) not Ilian. Sorry for my mistake. In some other Wiki, blanking results into cancelling the page. perhaps not in WPen:. Thanks.--Arorae (talk) 12:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Dear Mccapra. I hope you're good. There's an IP who has been pushing their POV on Mufti Abdul Razzaq, an article I created utilising a lot of my time. You're well aware that this is my major field of work. I've started a discussion at the talk page on whether we should use Urdu honorific or the English one on the article infobox, the Mufti-e-Azam in this case. Please enlighten the discussion with your experienced opinion. Thanks. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 07:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi! Sorry for bothering you. I want to discuss more about drafting of Bank Kaltimtara article. I am well aware that there's no inherit notability of Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). I am also aware that the article is currently very stubby and needs a lot of improvement. I just recently add little bit citations on it. And i am also aware that most of companies or organization article need to explain more than just simply existing.
Indonesian regional development banks are extension of government, controlled, and managed by provincial government. Based on Law Number 13 of 1962, which is citated in article explaining the type of bank, regional development banks are "not allowed to operate until it gets a business license from the Minister of Central Bank Affairs (Now Ministry of Finance). Before granting a business license, the Minister of Central Bank Affairs shall hear the opinion of the Minister of General Administration and Regional Autonomy (Now Ministry of Home Affairs)". On Article Number 3 of the law, it is stated that the company is governed by law, and also stated in Article Number 11 is appointed by provincial government.
Just by it's own status as completely under provincial government, managed under national & regional laws, and operated differently compared to conventional banks, i do think all of these matter give all of 26 banks of each Indonesian provinces notability.
I accept that the article is now in draft, and i'll try to improve it. But i just want to make it clear that all regional development banks in Indonesia deserve their own article and should be treated as extension of government or a government branch, unlike most of companies. I am planning to create article of other regional development banks in the future, so I hope this clear out the dispute on whether these banks have notability on it's own or not. If you disagree with some of my point, please let me know. I'd like to discuss the matter, and I apologize if I sounds rude or bothering you.
Thanks
Nyanardsan (talk) 05:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Simon Peter Hughes. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Mary Elizabeth Parker Bouligny, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 02:04, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
I translated it from es.wiki . Thanks. --Opus88888 (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC) (edited)
Hi, you recently moved page Abia Town, Enugu State from the main space to Draft: Abia Town, Enugu State stating not ready for main space. Please what specifically do you need us add to the page? Thanks
The Abia page simply talked about the town and few things common with similar geographic locations and culture. It did not delve into issues that require extensive references. I know you are trying to improve on the reliability of Wikipedia pages but in this case you holding us to a higher/extra standard than others. There are many places having Wiki page that the references did not specifically dwelled on the place.
The sections you stated that bear references (2,4,5) do not contain materials that warrant specifically mentioning Abia. They talked about general customs/issues common to the people from the same area. The sections with no references are just what they are- mere statement of facts that did not go further.
Please if you can move it back to the main page. ThanksMuna3c (talk) 16:48, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
@Mccapra, no problem, I will research for relevant references about Abia and work on it in the draft. ThanksMuna3c (talk) 11:02, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
I noticed speedy deletion tag on Hemant Sharma . The previously deleted article was about Author (most likely indian) but this article is about nepalese singer you can check i have sited various reliable sources. although the name are matching but they are 2 different articles. Khagendrawiki (talk) 00:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
EY-Parthenon: Can we please discuss this on the talk page first? The other Big 4 accounting firms Deloitte and PwC also have independent strategy consulting brands Monitor Deloitte and Strategy& respectively, both having independent WIki pages as both subsidiaries were from a notable acquisition. CDB-Man (talk) 01:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
ماهي مشكلتك معي ؟؟ أين الخطأ الذي فعلته؟ ليس لي علاقة بأي أحد ولا أكتب مقالات عن نفسي Aliaboomar (talk) 18:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Here’s a list of your identified sockpuppets. Mccapra (talk) 18:07, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
did you know Wikipedia:Clean start ? Aliaboomar (talk) 18:14, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Clean start Aliaboomar (talk) 18:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for moving my draft to the draftspace. Sorry. PunxtawneyPickle (talk) 20:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Ksh.andronexus
Sir, I have moved the page of Rosh HaAyin Forest from Draft criteria to Article (criteria), hence, (this message is to inform you about it), the reason is- I have found independent resources and references regarding to the Article.
If you have any concerns about it, you may report it on my Talk Page.
Thanks!
Ksh.andronexus◢
(•Talk)
03:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Dear Mccapra,
I am uncertain as to why you added a link saying that the page Marie Armand Patrice de Mac Mahon was an orphan page ad it has no links to it. I wish to make the page as good as possible, so it would be wonderful if you could explain this, so I can make improvements. I am asking because the page clearly has many links, I wish to know if there are any others I should be adding?
Yours sincerely,
Angloscottish Angloscottish (talk) 23:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much, that makes a lot of sense, thank you for the explanation. Angloscottish (talk) 14:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I am trying my level best to contribute accurate data with proper references. Keep supporting. Orator1989 (talk) 12:56, 19 June 2021 (UTC) |
I saw filling the template as a critical necessity. I didn't create it, I just found the template in roughly its current form but with almost entirely red links. My approach has been that because the template is years old and has been approved already, it means that the articles linked (or redlinked) are already notable and should exist and their lack of current existence placed a substantial burden on Wikipedia's coverage of the topic. Shad Ohrmazd and Mihr in particular were figures I felt needed articles urgently because they have been in the template for years, and without the articles it's unclear who these names even refer to. My hope was that by creating these articles that I created they would offer a new direction for Wikipedia to improve.
I have made the contributions I see as easiest on the topic already. I'd suggest merging Denawars with See of Babylon into an article about the Manichaean East-West schism, with Shad Ohrmazd redirecting to the Denawars section as neither seem notable enough on their own. The Chinese template has such an article as a red link in it, but as the template didn't include such an article in English I interpreted the separate articles as being the Wikipedia agenda. Do you consider it to be appropriate to just make this major change against the template without further discussion? Was I making a mistake in terms of how highly I valued the template?
I have since merged Manichaeism in China into Chinese Manichaeism and redirected Mihr to Chinese Manichaeism#Tang dynastySiliconProphet (talk) 22:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Sunshine! | ||
Hello Mccapra! JW 1961 Talk has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding ((subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine)) to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding ((User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon)). Happy editing! JW 1961 Talk 21:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC) |
Have a great first day of summer JW 1961 Talk 21:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Thanks for your comments on the Peter Engbrecht article. I am disappointed that you do not find this article appropriate at this time though I am happy to address these problems as raised. Can you provide further commentary as to why the dates do not make sense and as to why links to articles from the Government of Canada, the Winnipeg Free Press, and indirectly the Toronto Star do not qualify as reliable independent sources? The latter two both serve as newspapers of record for their areas in Canada and I would be happy to fix or clarify the dates. Krazytea(talk) 22:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi! Did you check the sources? Just because these are in Chinese, doesn't mean the subject is not notable. Use google translate, you will get the gist of those articles. Or you can check the Baike Baidu (the Chinese equivalent of Wikipedia) article on him https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E8%89%BE%E7%A6%8F%E6%9D%B0%E5%B0%BC to see there is a lot we could say about this person. Would my Chinese be on a higher level, I would be able to write more. But that would take a hundred hours using a dictionary. Hence a stub. But notability does not depend on length of article. It has sufficient sources that discuss the person in depth. Xia talk to me 10:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
I made this page longer, but I heard about you delete my page because of speedy deletion. It's unclear to do that. I was the only one who made it originally, and please restore the page. Fortunewriter (talk) 23:01, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
So I can tell the deletion admin to restore it, right? Fortunewriter (talk) 23:17, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Sorry to disturb you. I’m a historian and not too experienced with Wikipedia. Added quite important facts about the Rhodesian people after 1980 and about the Government of Rhodesia, neutral, academic, not touching Zimbabwe in any way. However, it’s all under heavy fire as if the bush wars would have never ended… The users just clicked on the most convenient (and at the same time least important) links (now deleted because not essential) and started a campaign to return to the version of history which is political, not scientific. The deletion discussion was even started with the claim that my contribution was based in odd links, ignoring the dozens of academic sources. I even deleted the links which someone found not reliable, but the deletion discussion is still there, based on totally wrong assumptions. I am truly shocked. Since you seem to be quite a Wikipedia and history expert, it would be great if you could have a look, and maybe bring this to a quick solution. Either the stop of the deletion discussion because it’s based on just two links which have already gone, or a quick deletion to save all of us precious time. Thanks a lot. University Professor for History (talk) 14:19, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Mccapra, I know this article still needs work, but it seems to me notability should be OK now (especially with NYT obit). Can that tag be removed? Thanks
OK, Thanks for all this Sheijiashaojun (talk) 09:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'm MPGuy2824. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Asrenda, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Dear Mr. McCapra:
I have received your message of June 26, 2021 with the position that the article ’Vasyl Shevchenko (artist)’ in Wikipedia is placed on the deleting list because of lack of information links in English. However, the problem is typical for the majority of art professionals who lived in the times of the Soviet Union and whose activity did not correspond with the rules of so-called socialistic standards. Nevertheless, how strong and professional you are and how many people like your arts, the mass media (both domestic and foreign ones) are closed for any discussions about your potential masterpieces or your career if you have got the status of ’forbidden artist’. This is our case. And this fact is the explanation why at the beginning of the XXI Century only a few links and references about the activity of Vasyl Shevchenko as an artist are publicly available and unfortunately only in Ukrainian and Russian. So, I have started only a couple of years ago and do all my best to promote the heritage of Vasyl Shevchenko to the broad public as well as to the professional experts society. Namely, I have written the article ’Vasyl Shevchenko (artist)’ for the promotional exhibition of Vasyl Shevchenko pictures scheduled in autumn, 2020 in the Netherlands. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 problem destroyed the last year's plan. But the business is in progress. I believe the most important point to answer the question of whether it is advisable or not to find the article ’Vasyl Shevchenko (artist)’ in the public domain is to take into account the fact that physically the painting works of Vasyl Shevchenko are available for public and it is possible to look at them. Everything else is a matter of taste: whether you like paintings or dislike them. And was it worth the audience to waste their time contemplating? As can be judged from the references to the above-mentioned article (unfortunately in Ukrainian again), the professionals answer the last question positively. After all, the expression ’Neither glory nor wealth’ is rooted in the Homilies of Jonah Chrysostom XXIV. 3 and 4. And in the history of mankind, there were many artists, even the majority, who lived their lives in the same way. I believe, no matter how events develop in the future, Vasyl Shevchenko was not the first and will not be the last in this raw. Sincerely and with good wishes, Mykola Shevchenko. Shnv1 (talk) 10:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC) |
Plz tell me how I can correct my work instead of deletion request... Mr bond. .isaahmad (talk) 13:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
@Mccapra: I request you to permanently register Reza Bahram's page. He also has an Instagram blue tick and I ask you to remove the quick delete tag. Help me in this regard Thanks
Just a heads up. Onel5969 moved all these to draft space for lack of sourcing [1]. The creator resubmitted them; I had rejected them as still lacking sourcing [2]. The article creator has blanked their talk page and moved the articles back to main space. They lack sourcing and the single source in the article does not match the information claimed. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Please review the article i created on 17 July 2021 about Mela Raghu if you feel. Pachu Kannan (talk) 15:43, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Dear Mccapra, I recreated Arash Mardani’s article based by the news and references by Wikipedia policy. This article is notable but unfortunately you deleted it. I also wrote the article by myself. Please help to recreate it. Sincerely MMA Kid (talk) 12:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Dear Mccapra, I already asked user:Missvain on her talk page a few days ago but she doesn't answer. I really don't know why this article deleted first time and this time. Arash Mardani is notable in Iran. Just need search him name by Google. He 3 times got warrior belt (The highest sports sign in Iran) from Iran leader and president. Sincerely MMA Kid (talk) 17:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Dear Missvain and Mccapra, According to your tips, the article was transferred to the draft space section. Regards MMA Kid (talk) 04:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations. You are participating in the current precipitous decline of Wikipedia by discouraging SMEs from contributing. I probably won't be wasting any more of my time contributing articles, and I certainly won't be arguing with self-appointed "editors" who haven't a clue what they're doing. Have fun riding the jet into the ground. Rcarlberg (talk) 19:47, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=761589 https://www.marketplace.org/shows/marketplace-tech/why-its-so-hard-for-biographies-about-women-to-stay-on-wikipedia/ https://schott.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/26/deletionists/
If a school is considered important or significant enough, why aren't all pages about schools deleted? KtMystic (talk) 01:43, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of The Obelisk (magazine). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Fanofblackened (talk) 21:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
I saw that you moved this article to "Draft:Liam Kelley (historian)" but I managed to find these sources:
It's such a shame that such an influential historian doesn't have an article here. This person is actually one of the top names among contemporary Vietnamese historians and a lot more about him is published offline. While I agree that a biography of a living person shouldn't be a stub, adding "notability issues" or "reference" issues would have been better than moving it to a space where nobody can see it. --Donald Trung (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello dear user. Please remove the quick delete tag and tag more resources. I hope you agree with my request. You are my teacher.Thanks.E B R A M (talk) 06:27, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
why are u trying to delete my article? (Lebronistheking90001 (talk) 13:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC));
Hi,
We were unaware of the Wiki’s terms and conditions and the privacy policy, we will delete all the promotion contents. Kindly guide us how to proceed further, is there a possibility to recover the same page or can we create as a new page.
Please advice.
Thanks. Syedshawar (talk) 05:51, 20 August 2021 (UTC)syed shawar
I have recently created a page of Francisco Xavier da Cunha Aragão which had been reviewed by you. I have completed the editing of the page so please check the page as it is on criteria to remove the tag so that I can go for the assessment. Please give your review also.(I ame Shears (talk) 03:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC))
Hi Mccapra, you were on the page on June 28, 2021. Since then I have fixed the page so will you review it now Draft:Raybak_Abdesselem --Static Hash (talk) 07:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
I made a draft and submitted it for review, Last week the Athlete won a gold medal in EKF championship that was held in Finland, so he was on all media of France. I added references & resubmitted the article. --Static Hash (talk) 07:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Mccapra, with great surprise and also disappointment I learned that my article does not comply with Wikipedia's guidelines. This surprises me even more, as my article is the exact translation of my German-language article about Panarama: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panarama
In the German Wikipedia there were no problems with the publication. You have to know that I am a friend of the musician Hermann Weindorf and that my information is first hand. I can't contribute more than the two sources given in the article. So where is the problem? Remembergeorge (talk) 07:33, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Good day,
I thank you for your review, edits and message; this is immensely helpful. This tool is what I was searching for! I really appreciate this; I will henceforth use this tool for anything I do on Wikipedia.
Sincerely, Jmedraj (talk) 13:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I get stuck in deletion nomination process of Ali Liakat. Could you pls guide me how to deal with the process? I'm just a new reviewer. TIA. Htanaungg (talk) 08:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my project "Vasyl Shevchenko (artist)", Mr. Maccapra. It wasn't not the main aim of my life. Maybe I'll come back to it later. Then I will turn to you for help. But I made conclusions about sources. Sincerely your, Mykola Shevchenko. Good luck!
Hi. I would like to ask how to removed the redirect of "Lian Huaiwei" to page "Youth with Youth Season 3". I found that the page is highlighted that it is not fulfil notability requirement. Based on the latest information, Lian Huaiwei is officially debut as one of the Chinese group "IXFORM" on July 2021. And before that he is one of the contestants for another competition show, and he is operating his entertainment studio. Thus I think that it is not suitable to redirect. Please advise. Thanks. Roxlerz (talk) 18:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello I ve seen that you reported a celebrity s page for emidate but his previous page was deleted unfairly as same as this one please don't delete this page again Alirezamomeni236 (talk) 22:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The person who deleted the previous page of Sepehr Sepi intended to sabotage Sepehr Sepi's Wikipedia due to personal enmity with her. Amiraliyasini190 (talk) 22:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi, the removal tag you left for Sepehr Sepi page does not make sense Sepehr Sepi All the sources on its page are valid and are from Iranian, Indian, Russian and Ukrainian international sites. He is a famous Iranian superstar and the person who deleted Sepehr Sepi's page is hostile to Sepehr Sepi. The people of Iran and some countries hate Sepehr Sepi Faridasadi202111 (talk) 22:39, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Please help me to edit the sepehr Sepi page According to the research I did on Sepehr Sepi in Google, he is really a famous person in Iran But I need his help editing his page. Please help me. Thank you. Arminamirkabir900 (talk) 23:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Mr Mccapra, Good day, I hope you're doing fine today. Please check and help review Grace & Talent and The Certificate (album). Thanks in advance. --Idoghor Melody (talk) 11:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Please do not change the page Star Maa Gold into a redirect page as it is a channel by Star India and a sister channel of Star Maa. Thanks and regards, Mohammad Liyaqat Read! Talk! 08:29 AM, 15 September 2021 (IST)
Hello, Mccapra,
You were right to tag this article as a copyright violation. However, you notified the page creator, who just created this page as a redirect, not the editor who introduced all of the inappropriate content. It's an easy mistake to make if you, like me, rely on Twinkle to post notifications. But I moved your warning from the page creator's (who is inactive) talk page to that of the editor who introduced copyright violating content. Probably a good idea to check the page history when you are checking pages for blatant violations like this. Thank you for your work! Liz Read! Talk! 02:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Mccapra,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Mr Mccapra, good day. I dropped a message for you recently but didn't get any reply and you didn't address the issue. Please help review these pages:
Thank you sir. --Idoghor Melody (talk) 11:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Hey, doesn't make any sense remove this pages as it is referenced in the wiki articles of each ediction of the games (it is possible to easily check that the information is the same). The articles just follow the same template as others created earlier, so I added the same references present on other pages in this category. Svartner (talk) 17:05, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Please visit Wikipedia:Orphan and Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Layout#"See_also"_section to read about appropriate use of the "See also" section. Such linking has also been addressed at Wikipedia_talk:Orphan#"See_also"_spam. De-orphaning articles is an important task, but it shouldn't lead to link spamming of more prominent articles. And I don't think it is a good idea to put those links in other sections, like "features" (e.g. Graham_Land#Features), if the only rationale is to deorphan the articles. The section does not become representative - it should use relevance and prominence as selection criteria. - 4ing (talk) 07:48, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I've added 8 new references from 2 new sources to the article. Do you think the 'one source' box can be removed? Thanks! Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 12:34, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Hii dear Admin. what is the problem why this Yaduvanshi page is not showing in google search and why its connection site is associated with Yadu (legendary king) page, please solve this problem. AlexaRiveralis (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Dear @Mccapra I search in Google Yaduvanshi, Yaduvanshi will not come, but I will search 'yaduvanshi or yaduvanshi or yadukula' then it will come and then click on it Yaduvanshi title, then Yadu (legendary king) page open, why? Why Yaduvanshi page not open? AlexaRiveralis (talk) 19:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Mccapra, You have added a speedy deletion tag to the article of Fraz Wahlah citing WP:G4. I created this article myself from scratch, even if another article existed and been deleted in 2018, I have not seen that, so it can't be identical to mine. The photo of Fraz Wahlah is used and his name is mentioned as the main illustration material on multiple Wikipedia pages regarding Pakistani history and MRD: Pakistan Peoples Party, Islamization in Pakistan, Human rights abuses in Pakistan under Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, and Movement for the Restoration of Democracy. In fact, the Wikipedia page of MRD mentions only three names under its main photo: Zia-ul-Haq, Fraz Wahlah and his father. Those references are there for ages, and they show the relevance of Wahlah.
The BBC also considered Fraz Wahlah as notable and covered his story multiple times, both in written version or on the radio, as it's cited on the page, alongside with further established, reliable media outlets that published his photo and named him as a symbolical person of the MRD.
Regarding his Technology career, the Pakistan Software House Association and Ms Jehan Ara are both clearly notable and have their own Wikipedia pages, and their reference to Fraz Wahlah show the importance of Wahlah's success on APICTA for the tech sector of Pakistan.
I haven't seen the original, deleted article, it may not have been referenced well, but in my opinion, this article is supported by multiple references from reliable sources, and if another page about the same person would not have been deleted earlier, this page would not be questioned at all.
I think, due to references from multiple reliable sources and the fact that Fraz Wahlah's photo is the most often used illustration material for such a well documented historical incident as the Movement for the Restoration of Democracy, this article clearly has its place on Wikipedia, so please consider removing the deletion tag. Thanks, DillonPalm (talk) 18:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Regarding your draftification of these two articles, I think it may be more worthwhile to move them back to mainspace and put them up for AfD. The creator was indefinitely blocked for various reasons, so it is extremely doubtful anyone would work on these in draftspace, and WP:DRAFTIFY is clear that it shouldn't be used as a form of shadow-deletion. Just my two-cents Curbon7 (talk) 17:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Hey! You recently suggested that 1930 Brazilian coup d'état should be merged into Brazilian Revolution of 1930. If you wouldn't mind elaborating on why, please do, preferably on the talk page of the latter article. Thanks, and have a good day/night! FredModulars (talk) 00:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Ok so I removed the claims that had outstanding "citations needed" pending. The article only has a couple of references as it is a basic fact article, linked to a broader complex political party, it is one of many branches. Jadamondo (talk) 10:10, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
I have rearranged a page named Pantsir-M two months ago. I have completed it and I wanted to remove that tag. Thanks and happy editing.(I ame Shears (talk) 02:42, 10 October 2021 (UTC))
I will work further to improve till it achieve te standard level. Thanks for your help. Cheers I ame Shears (talk) 13:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, it was good to meet you. This is precisely the kind of edit that I mentioned. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)