Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, User:Katyperry, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. --NawlinWiki (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi MattStan10! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC) |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of most viewed YouTube videos has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of most viewed YouTube videos was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLirAqAtl_h2r5g8xGajEwdXd3x1sZh8hC) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:33, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
User:MattStan10, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MattStan10 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MattStan10 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Ricky81682 (talk) 07:04, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I wanna know why you reverted the accessdates on List of most disliked YouTube videos. An access date is when the item was accessed thus if you're updating a list, wouldn't that need to be changed too? The editnotice says the opposite to what you put into the article. --Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:48, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
|access-date=
(or its alias, |accessdate=
) is the date that the online resource addressed by |url=
was added to the article." Therefore the accessdates should not change because the online resources were only added to the article once. They are not added to the article every time the dislike count is updated. --MattStan10 (talk) 18:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
--Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)Hi there, with regard to this edit at Masha and the Bear, please note that we do not capitalize the article "the" unless it comes at the beginning of a sentence. Our style manual entry for composition titles can be found at MOS:CT. Thanks. --Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
I said I understand if my edit was undid, but your reasoning is invalid. The episode name is "Recipe for Disaster". "Masha and the Bear" is the name of the series. --0737290632t2x273n (talk) 12:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
OH! I understand now. The video name you inserted was the russian name. I apoligize for that. --0737290632t2x273n (talk) 12:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The song of Jacob Sartorius Hit or Miss is suppose tobe in the list of the most disliked videos on youtube with 542K dislikes. Thx to update it. --Erykamah (talk) 01:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Please don't mark edits with over a 1,000 bytes minor, it really makes it confusing to other editors why you did this edit, and can get very annoying with you do this repeatedly. It really isn't this huge of a deal to me, but it can be to other editors. Just please don't mark large edits with a minor edit next time. --JJBers (talk) 00:03, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
I misunderstood the table on the current and former records for List of most liked YouTube videos. I thought that "See You Again" being the current record holder, that it would also show on the table. What I didn't know was that the colors on the table was about the record on "Days held", rather than the actual record of likes. I apologize for the misunderstanding. --Sekyaw (talk) 14:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
--Mlpearc (open channel) 01:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of most disliked YouTube videos. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Why is it important to advertise VEVO on this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TangLab (talk • contribs) 18:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, MattStan10. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I have nominated the List of most discussed YouTube videos for deletion, as seen here. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 23:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most viewed Bollywood videos on YouTube is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most viewed Bollywood videos on YouTube until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fastest YouTube videos to reach 100 million views is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fastest YouTube videos to reach 100 million views until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
![]() |
The Resilient Barnstar |
Fantastic contributions, very dedicated. Jackalexander102 (talk) 04:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC) |
Sorry I didn't write a proper edit summary (I pressed the wrong Twinkle button), but I reverted your edit because align=center is an obsolete attribute in HTML5 and is supposed to be replaced by CSS. Jc86035 (talk) Use ((re|Jc86035))
to reply to me 16:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:MattStan10, can you make an image map of all the regenerations of Rassilon for the article's infobox please? Like the one on The Master (Doctor Who).--Theo Mandela (talk) 03:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
I initially removed the videos on the article, List of most viewed online videos in the first 24 hours, because they were poorly sourced, per WP:OR. For example, all the videos for the "YouTube Rewinds" are sourced to either this playlist by "MyTop100" videos, https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLirAqAtl_h2paOfFiwY-I62jFk2n07ayI. The playlist in question had things like "witnessed" and "stats", and hasn't been updated since December 2016. Furthermore, the "Adele Carpool Karaoke" video was sourced to the stats of the YouTube video itself. I honestly tried to look up news-sources for the 24-hour-ranking for these viral videos, but couldn't find them. It is safer to neglect these videos than to include every single alleged video. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 03:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Where do you find all these old tweets?? Gang14 (talk) 16:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:See You Again performed by Wiz Khalifa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, MattStan10. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of most streamed songs on Spotify, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-liked tweets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-liked tweets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 16:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, MattStan10. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-followed Twitter accounts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-followed Twitter accounts (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-liked YouTube videos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-liked YouTube videos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2019 (UTC)