Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:
This defuser most likely is notable–Washington Post dedicated an entire article about him.
This article seems like a praise more than an encyclopedic article. I can tell that his deed's are noble. He risks his life everyday after all. However, we strive to have neutrality in our articles.
For example, text like
"His expertise has played a pivotal role in the successful convictions of numerous terrorists." are not natural in tone. Words like "highly regarded" or "distinguished" are subjective opinions and should be removed. I suggest reading WP:PEACOCK. Continue working on this, it has potiential!
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shafqat Ullah Malik, S.St and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello there. The term where his experience has played a vitol role in conviction of numerous terrorists is correct. The actual figure is 5000+ cases which is mentioned in newspapers and many articles published on various occasions. If you prefer, i can edit some things. Malik2308 (talk) 19:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, then you can say that he worked on 5000+ cases. However, "played a vital role" is vague and unhelpful to the readers. MY suggestion is to states facts rather than interpretations. Catalk to me!00:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Malik2308!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Catalk to me!11:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shafqat Ullah Malik, S.St and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shafqat Ullah Malik, S.St and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.