Now I'm officially confused. The images at commons were originally uploaded by you to Wikipedia in 2006. When you uploaded them, you credited them to http://www.uniforminsignia.net/index.php?p=show&id=171&sid=329. If they were created by you, why did you credit them to someone else? -- But|seriously|folks 08:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of National Merit | |
for your outstanding contributions to Sri Lanka related articles, this was long due NëŧΜǒńğerPeace Talks 08:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC) |
The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by grafikbot 09:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
K thanks will do, oh congradsNitraven 15:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
yapNitraven 15:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey machan thanks a lot for the Barnstar ill definitely keep up work :) Nitraven 18:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the speedy deletion template you placed on Military ranks and insignia of the Sri Lanka Army. Feel free to take it to AfD but I believe it does contain enough context to constitute an article. If you have any questions, please leave them on my talk page. - Rjd0060 16:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
hi,
These days I am doing some edits, you can see "Category:Hotels in Sri Lanka". You can support the edits.--Canberaguy 21:07, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
I'll send u an email as soon as i figure out how to do it on wiki :S Nitraven 09:15, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
I am just busy outside of Wikipedia, but I will reply shortly to your message(s). Please keep my talk page on your watchlist. — Sebastian 04:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Lahiru k for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Sumoeagle179 17:28, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked indef for abusing your editing privileges after using several sockpuppets accounts as per this discussion and this evidence. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 00:06, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Lahiru k (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
There was no checkuser done for my block. Please unblock me to defend my self. I hope you understand that this isn't fair by my side since I have not been given a chance to provide reasons and defend myself. I was active during last night (Sri Lankan time) and when I woke up this morning, I was blocked without even a proper warning or time. Please do me justice.
Decline reason:
Your SSP case looks quite convincing. If you'd like to defend yourself, please do so on this page, but until you provide a good reason you'll remain blocked. MaxSem 12:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please see: Discussion move and Specific proposal Your participation and acceptance would be appreciated. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Lahiru k. You have just been unblocked as per this ANI thread. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 22:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Unblocked as per The AN. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 21:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Created a page on Col A.F. Lafir but can find a pic. If u can find one can u add it.Nitraven 10:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Machan why did you put speedily deleted on Category:Battles involving Sri Lanka and remove all the links to it? Nitraven 19:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by grafikbot 14:22, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I recognise that you do not care to have a sockpuppet accusation made against you (via comment to another) but you should not just remove the offending remarks. Refuting them, civilly, would be appropriate - but if you do wish to remove them then you should not use TWINKLE or semi automated script but replace them with a "redacted" notice with your reasons. If you feel there is vandalism (neutrally, I feel there might be) then report it to ANI and let an uninvolved admin sort it out. LessHeard vanU 15:07, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I had a read of WP:RS. There is NO indication that these sites are not necessarily permitted. I'm not doing that to bother you. I wan't to improve the articles, as I believe you do. And boxofficeindia.com is the official site of box office figures in India. It is used in a featured article - Lage Raho Munnabhai. Regards, Shahid • Talk2me 19:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
--PFHLai 13:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 02:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Do you know you have wrongly labelled TS's daughter as a child soldier? Although I am not to deny that LTTE and the SL government via Karuna does enlist Tamil Children as child soldiers Taprobanus 04:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello Lahiru! I just created Wikipedia:WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation/housekeeping to separate our internal housekeeping stuff from the current discussion about articles, which is of interest for more than just our members. Please add this page to your watchlist. I also wrote a new proposal on its talk page, WT:SLR/H#Proposed recipients for barnstars. Please let me know what you think of it! — Sebastian 11:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
My edit was NOT vandalism! It was to correct an error. One cannot be a "member" of the Royal Society, one is elected a Fellow. Please do not revert edits when you don't have the correct facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.63.75.2 (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for this, that's nice, I didn't knew this. --Cyfal (talk) 14:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation#Image:LTTE child soldier.jpg, I have tagged Image:LTTE child soldier.jpg for deletion. There is an option to re-upload the image under a different title, but you should see the discussion for details. (Also, if there is any information that was overlooked in the discussion, please say so ...). I just want to notify you of the tagging and make sure that you're aware of the discussion. Cheers, Black Falcon (Talk) 06:27, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Need an answer on my talk page. — Rlevse • Talk • 17:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi My article was cited properly, and I had no new research input. Please explain to me what you consider a libel? Also please do not delete my article to revert to an already libellous article in which a radical writer (who and which is not even scholarly) insinuates that Prof Hoole is anti-Hindu. He does not so far as mention that OTHER ACTUAL SCHOALRS claim that his Christian faith is used against him by the LTTE. SO now tell me how you could allow citations to an article which slanders Prof. Hoole but you cannot allow citations to an article that shows the flip side?
Also Prof. Hoole was appointed by the UGC. The LTTE did use threats and intimidation to stop his assuming position as VC of JU. What else is there? Please make it clear to me why you have reverted to the original article which I find biased and slanderous. Thanks. HeRA474 (talk) 02:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Lahiru i am also from Sri Lanka. i would like u to please take intrest in the article Kumar because Kumar article is being discriminated by Sikh Extremist due to hate towards Hindu. Kumar is also name of Skanda a.k.a Murugan which is a God in Buddha and Hindu Culture. Please check out article Kumar and fix those Sikh Extremist for vandalising many many important Hindu articles. the IP address for Vandalising Kumar is 129.64.153.64 . i request you to just keep an eye on that article i will deal with the rest. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamil33 (talk • contribs)
Dear Lahiru i am also from Sri Lanka. i would like u to please take intrest in the article Kumar because Kumar article is being discriminated by Sikh Extremist due to hate towards Hindu. Kumar is also name of Skanda a.k.a Murugan which is a God in Buddha and Hindu Culture. Please check out article Kumar and fix those Sikh Extremist for vandalising many many important Hindu articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamil33 (talk • contribs)
I request Lahiru to add protection template and lock page Kumar due to heavily vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamil33 (talk • contribs) 15:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Are you still working on it? It still contained both the "under construction" and the "in use" tag. I already removed the latter. — Sebastian 02:50, 22 December 2007 (UTC)