This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Thanks Xavexgoem (talk) 12:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
User:ECWAGuru keeps blanking his talk page after he gets warned under what reason should I give him a Warning ?
Hehe :) No problem. De728631 (talk) 19:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
i just thought it would enlighten mr T's page a bit lol :)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Countcrackyoula (talk • contribs)
Hi, please take into consideration that User:157.203.42.50 was not a customer for AIV, this is a content dispute that should not be handled by automated tools such as huggle. If you weren't using an automated tool, please keep in mind that AIV is only for outright vandalism. Thanks! -- lucasbfr talk 12:08, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Roman A
In the discussion the article is clearly marked - "A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article."
Which means that large changes can be made to the feature article without previous discussion. That is what I did, in an attempt to remove libeous and unproven claims.
What is the response? You revert and accuse me of Vandalism, and then prompt a ban.
I believe your actions fall under the heading of "Administrator Abuse" on the Adminstrators guidelines page
Your "warning" and reversion are unwarranted and not inline with the beliefs of open source or Wiki
I have entered a point on the talk page bring the attention to your actions in hope that someone else will support the correct and needed changes I made which you reverted.
UK Ecomony
Again there was discussion in the Talk section - I acted on it and you claim it is vandalism and revert....
ok as noted by both users I apologise about this event and I will ask a admin to remove all warnings which were given. I gave the warning to the Ip address because I thought he was removing content. Alexnia (talk) 13:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
ouch seems like a have two apologise about two articles this dosn't look like a good day for me ;(
The reason I reported you on that article was because you removed information. Alexnia (talk) 13:43, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
From my perspective its me that is not having the good day, since it was my time that got wasted not yours - sometimes content removal is a good thing you know —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.35.101.76 (talk) 13:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
I already reported this incident to the admins and I'm waiting for a response for removal of the warning I also want to notice that I have also wasted my time trying to solve this problem what do want anyway and forgodsake sign your comments. Alexnia (talk) 14:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
I would also like you too have a look to this page to show you I reported it to the admins http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Roman_Abramovich_Misunderstoodment_by_User:Alexnia
Alexnia (talk) 14:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Notice Case : Roman Abramovich
this case has been solved in favour of the accused. Warning of The Ip user in mention have been removed. Admins have been told about this case.
Any more comments about incident Roman Abramovich will be removed without comment.
Please see Archive 2 for talk about the case.Alexnia (talk) 15:07, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Admin response per ANI thread:
It seems like you have been having a tough time over this. It is unfortunately when a new user takes umbrage over things. I think s/he got off on the wrong foot and is now taking offence where none is intended. Best of luck. Ground Zero | t 18:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
well,well,well Truthway was really a person who took the templates in wikipedia to seriously and then started to flame a WP:HUGGLE user without understanding the faults which happen while using this automated programme. At least my archive is gonna be bigger - Personal Note Alexnia (talk) 21:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
The internet has hacked you all also china —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.16.64.66 (talk) 15:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Good day, Alexnia! I will remove the page about web-site, I understand that right now I don't meet the requirements. I hope to write an article about web-site later, when it will be well-known.
Thank you, Sincerely, Stanislav Kaliyev
ooops sorry about that didn't notice you were the author of the article ; thanks for not getting mad at me xDAlexnia (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
So I can continue working at the article, or should I place it somewhere else to publish it later, when it will be ready? Stanislav Kaliyev (talk) 13:31, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
well my advice would be too make a subpage and write your article there and when you feel it is perfect you can recreated it after it was deletedAlexnia (talk) 10:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. I have created the subpage. The original page may be deleted now. (talk) 14:22, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
is it okay if I remove the warning since I understood my mistakeAlexnia (talk) 11:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Please be more careful with them. This edit was not appropriate as the edit you reverted was in fact constructive (consolidting two identical named references into one). Thanks, Christopher Parham (talk) 19:54, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
ok sorry thanks for noticing i was using huggle a bit too much :P Alexnia (talk) 09:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Merrill kent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon))
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. RGTraynor 15:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
yeah thanks for putting that under speedy deletion I was on a NP patrol and I tagged the page. While I taged it , it was deleting and I accidentally recreated it.
Alexnia (T) @ 17:26, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
why are you being so ignorant? this is pure racism
Alexnia (T) @ 19:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
look, i am confused here., i cant seem to get a human to tell me why an accomplished musician cant be written about on wikipedia..god knows i see millions. ive been trying to write this page "cody Bailey" and it keeps getting deleted. can you please help? i dont understand this site so can someone please email me??
thank you
[email removed]
-cody —Preceding unsigned comment added by Droptest (talk • contribs) 20:23, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
well first you need to you need too prove that the noted article approves WP:BIO/Notability this need to be done by inserting Citation & references with out these your article has 99% chance to be deleted I can't help any further since I can't remember the conntents of the deleted page.
Alexnia (T) @ 14:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Just for your Info, CSD:G4 applies for only those articles which are deleted via Afd.
Was this one nominated for AfD? if yes then ignore my message.
Hitro 14:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
the authors talk page looked liked if the article was already deleted; if it was not I'll remove the CSD:G4 notice
Alexnia (T) @ 14:53, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm a bit confused so CSD:G4 only implies when it got deleted via Afd not CSD?
Alexnia (T) @ 15:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
I recently posted a wiki page on an artist by the name of Jessica Cha... I added more information to the page, so hopefully that will suffice. I am not really sure why you don't consider her notable though, my friends and I found her on imeem, and wanted to know more about her, so we searched yahoo.com and she was all over the front couple of pages... but I saw she didnt have a wiki, so I decided to create one.
hope to hear from you soon! vivienne —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1FanoftheArts (talk • contribs) 10:59, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Ok fine I'll remove the Notability tag and I'll post a message to the user who categorized the page for csd
Alexnia (T) @ 11:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
see this 1
Alexnia (T) @ 11:11, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
hello Alexnia, thank you for responding so quickly, and I am glad you reminded me of the tildes! I will remember from now on! I promise
-vivienne
1FanoftheArts (talk) 11:23, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
hehe it seems like while you recreated the page another fellow editor has tagged the article and proposed it for deletion good luck ;) oh jeah it might also be useful to read over the links which were posted on your talkpage
Alexnia (T) @ 13:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Alexnia (T) @ 13:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC)