Welcome!

Hello, Jedi Friend! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding ((Ping|I dream of horses)) to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 12:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Schwartz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Same-sex marriage in Sonora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Action Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Same-sex marriage  with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:20, 21 May 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Copied from my talk page to keep the conversation on one page. Jim1138 (talk) 09:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Jim1138.
I don't quite understand why you reverted my edit on same-sex marriage. No content was removed, I moved or added content but I didn't remove any. Jedi Friend (talk) 09:05, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you removed two citations from the 2013 paragraph here and did not leave an wp:edit summary as to why. If you only moved them, I would think you should "reuse" the citations. See Help:Footnote, specifically WP:REFNAME. Please, use an edit summary. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please wp:ping me and others to keep the thread on one page. Preface your talk with ((ping|Jim1138)) (for me / leave off the tlx) add your comment, sign and save all three with the same save page. Otherwise the ping may not go out. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jim1138:, I moved both citations to same-sex marriage#United States. Excuse me for not using an edit summary, I'll try to always use one from now on. Jedi Friend (talk) 09:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is the citation valid for that 2013 section? If so, it should have a cite too. You can "reuse" a citation: <ref name= bozo>((cite web ... yada, yada, yada...))</ref> then <ref name= bozo/>. Note the slash "/". If the name has a space, enclose in quotes - <ref name= "bozo the clone"> Order / placement of the original / resuse cite is not important. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Thank you Jedi Friend (talk) 09:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is a really annoying option in Preferences/Editing - Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary I have them checked and I can't leave a blank edit summary. Although, as editing a section prefills the ES box, you can edit w/o an ES for that. Agravating, but I add ESs. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:57, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Pride 2016

As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?

  1. Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
  2. Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
  3. Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:09, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Same-sex marriage in Brazil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circular letter. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited LGBT rights in Taiwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yilan County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 09:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jedi Friend. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same-sex marriage in BIOT

Hello, Jedi Friend.

I was hoping you could review my findings in regards to the legality of same-sex marriage in the British Indian Ocean Territory. First, a document form the United States Navy, clearly stating that same-sex marriage is legal in Diego Garcia with the caveat that one of the parties of the union would be transferred off base http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/reference/milpersman/1000/1300Assignment/Documents/1300-314.pdf Second, the Overseas Marriage (Armed Forces) Order 2014, which applies to British personnel in the territory http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2014/9780111108802 I appreciate any feedback that you may have. Andrew1444 (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Andrew
From my perspective, there seems to be nothing stopping same-sex couples from getting married in the territory. The document from the US Navy confirms that. The Overseas Marriage (Armed Forces) Order 2014 also confirms it. I have no idea, however, if US military personnel may marry UK personnel. I saw you also asked User:Ron 1987. Maybe we should wait for his opinion? Jedi Friend (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I prepared a stub for a new page, "Same-sex marriage in the British Indian Ocean Territory" in my sandbox, and I am prepared to make necessary changes in other articles. Do you believe it would be appropriate for me to do so? Andrew1444 (talk) 00:37, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think it would. Jedi Friend (talk) 16:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We're on Twitter!

WikiLGBT is on Twitter!
Hello Jedi Friend!
Follow the Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the LGBT Wikipedan community should know. RachelWex (talk)

RachelWex 00:44, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Liechteinstein poll

Hi, you added this poll, but looking at the source, it looks rather like a simple (non-scientific) internet poll where online readers can simply click. See also the archive of previous polls. I guess we should not include it on Wikipedia? SPQRobin (talk) 15:17, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robin, yes I thought of not adding it at first for that exact reason (not to mention that online readers could simply use different devices to vote several times). However, I still thought it was interesting to include it on the page, because it's the first opinion poll (that I've found at least) where Liechtensteiners are asked about their opinions on same-sex marriage. I also looked at the archive of the previous polls (like you suggested) and saw that polls cannot be answered anymore after a week's time, meaning that a big portion of those answering have to be regular readers and thus probably live in Liechtenstein and are familiar with the newspaper. Should I maybe add a sentence mentioning that the poll is a simple internet poll and not a scientific one? Jedi Friend (talk) 15:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, if we're going to include it, we should add a clear disclaimer. Thanks, SPQRobin (talk) 23:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jedi Friend. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

compromise edit

Please see the compromise edit done in LGBT Rights in India and let me know here what your thoughts are before reverting I think this is an edit we can both agree on, it was reworded and clarified.Russianvodka (talk) 21:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Yes, I think it's fine. I need to apologise; you were right. Surgery is only allowed in Tamil Nadu and Kerala, not in the whole county. I also added this source to the page as it contains a good resume of the status of transgender people in India. Cheers Jedi Friend (talk) 12:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited De facto union in Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assembly of the Republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:22, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBT rights in Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBT rights in Brazil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Catarina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same-sex union laws around the world

Hi. Here is a discussion about Afghanistan being treated as having constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. I'm notifying you because you edited the map to remove that error. Ron 1987 (talk) 02:59, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PRRI edits - incorrect error margin

I noticed that you have recently made a number of edits (like this one or this one) that add and update state-by-state PRRI polling results.

Unfortunately, the margin of error number that you're using – 0.4% – for all of the state-by-state issues polls is incorrect. I am assuming that you got it from the website's Methodology page. That's problematic for two reasons. First, that margin applies to the U.S-wide demographic surveys (71,197 participants in 2017), and not the so-called issues subsample (40,017 participants). The U.S.-wide issues sample had a reported margin of error of 0.6%.

More important, that margin only applies to the U.S.-wide survey data. State-by-state results necessarily involved many fewer survey participants (fewer than 200 in states like AK or ND; more than 3000 in CA and TX). The margins of error will be larger on the state-by-state results—potentially much larger for the smaller-state surveys.

Can you go through and remove the incorrect margins, please? TenOfAllTrades(talk) 13:47, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ESEAP Conference 2018

Hello Jedi Friend,

I’m Irvin from PhilWiki Community, a member of the Communication Committee of the ESEAP Conference. ESEAP Conference 2018 is a regional conference for Wikimedia communities throughout the ESEAP region: ESEAP stands for East, Southeast Asia, and Pacific. Taking place in Bali, Indonesia on 5–6 May 2018, this is the first regional conference for these Wikimedia communities.

East and Southeast Asia and the Pacific are the most under-represented regions within the Wikimedia community. There is a significant number of Wikimedia contributors in our regions, yet we continue to struggle in establishing a well-managed community. This conference will bring participants from various ESEAP communities together in order to better understand the issues and to look for solutions. It also aims to connect people of the Wikimedia movement within ESEAP regions, to share ideas, and to build regional collaborations that are impossible to achieve through online communication.

We’ve got a lot of participation from several countries, but we’re lacking from your country. As we need more participants from your country, we believe that your contribution and participation would be a valuable asset to the success of this event. If you would like to participate in the conference, please do fill the form as soon as possible (by April 5, 2018) and we’ll inform you if you get selected for the conference.

Thank you and we hope to see you soon. --Filipinayzd 01:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to discussion

Hi, Jedi Friend. Please consider joining this discussion on the same-sex marriage article talk page regarding additions to the lead and to support or oppose the proposal. This message is being left for you as you are active in this topic area. Thank you! --Justthefacts9 (talk) 04:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Greetings Jedi Friend.

Thank you for your excellent work on "same-sex marriage Manitoba". Keep up the good work.

Rich North Rich North (talk) 17:00, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can u create a new page please

Hi sorry to bother u again And please respond with a yes or no this time so i know if i should ask another editor

but can u pls Create this timeline page by translating it from spanish 

Its an important page misding in english wiki Whenever u can or have time https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anexo:Cronología_de_la_despenalización_de_la_homosexualidad_por_país AdamPrideTN (talk) 22:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem :) Sorry I didn't answer earlier. I've been very busy these last few days.

Fixing a rederection

in the table of same sex marriage in the faroe islands edit the first table under the map in gay marriage since 2017 it redericts to denmark and not to faroe island marriage page Can u fix that please Sorry again AdamPrideTN (talk) 23:02, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help pls

Sorry to bother u but when i search for this page i created in google i cant find it :/ Pls help bcos i want create it in my sandbix many other new pages that i translated This is the real page Can u see to it please https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_Føroyar AdamPrideTN (talk) 01:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concering categories

I have 2 questions please First Sophus Thalbitzer is about a straight ally doctor who like Evelyn Hooker helped to decriminalise homosexuality in Denmark His categories are only LGBT history in Denmark But i added the categories of sexual orientation and psychology and the one of sexual orientatiin and science just like those of Evelyn Hooker ones. So should Evelyn Hooker be added to LGBT history in the US category Should Evelyn hooker and dophus trablitzer both be added to the category of LGBT activists in the us and in denmark resoectively Since that category contains a lot of LGBT allies and friends and scientists or what?

Second the page Lesbian Movement (Denmark) is in the category of LGBt history in denmark It is an lgbt assiciation that is defunct now Should it be put in LGBt assiciatii's in denmark category or what Or be created in a new categor of defunct lgbt association in the denmark as i qaw this category with many associatiins Or what what do u think Sorry for the bother again This may sound stupid and unnecessary for some But it is so important and improving believe me AdamPrideTN (talk) 01:48, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An update maybe??

reports that two anti-#LGBT bills, including a marriage ban bill, which passed the Senate last year, have still not advanced in the lower house

https://www.voanews.com/amp/in-haiti-slight-progress-for-lgbt-rights-is-seen-as-victory/4528161.html

http://www.whig.com/article/20180814/AP/308149903

http://agenciaaids.com.br/noticia/54575/

AdamPrideTN (talk) 02:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]