This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi. Doug Weller just deleted the spam page. however, that fellow has recreated it. We need to do something. 2600:8806:204:6300:EC88:36DC:CFE8:3D1C (talk) 17:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Well, marking it for deletion again is a good idea for now, deleting admin might take care of that, Good night. INVISIBLE^knock! 18:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Invisible, i know Xu minghao is a cofusing article, but i noticed that almost many new articles slowly become better and better and i thought that maybe he/she slowly improve his/her article.If you again unpatroled, No problem–– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 06:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC) –– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 06:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

@مجتبیٰ:Ah right, but there should be at least one reliable source. INVISIBLE^knock! 06:21, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Invisible Guy: New editors usually have little or no idea about References,etc. But they’re writing almost true, a day(not truely known) ago, i rewiewed article of RIT RAJARSHI, and i found no sources in his article but now he improved his article. –– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 06:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

@مجتبیٰ: Eh! Look even twitter was nominated for deletion once [1], providing reliable sources is really important to protect article from deletion. INVISIBLE^knock! 06:35, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

It will be good to review that article, once s/he gives sources. INVISIBLE^knock! 06:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes, i saw twitter. –– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 06:39, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

@مجتبیٰ: Okay, and please take a look at WP:NPP INVISIBLE^knock! 06:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

My contribution has been undone because it was dubbed uncontructive. However, it is a recurring fact regarding Löw, and it was covered by many media outlets :

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/row-zed/joachim-low-caught-yet-another-8186086 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3638796/Germany-manager-Joachim-hits-Low-s-pictured-sniffing-hands-readjusting-trousers-Euro-2016-win.html

https://www.google.fr/search?q=joachim+low&oq=joachim+low&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j0l5.1879j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=joachim+low&tbm=nws

It is constructive because it sheds some light on Löw's personality and personal life. On that regard, it is not different from the line that states that he lost his driving licence twice.

With that in mind, would you kindly reconsider?

Many thanks.

185.32.100.228 (talk) 15:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

@185.32.100.228: Hey, are you talking about this edit? INVISIBLE^knock! 15:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Hey,

Yes, that one. If you deem it more logical we could include one of the abovementioned articles as a source. I thought a video would be more convincing.

185.32.100.228 (talk) 15:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

@185.32.100.228: Well, I think that's not important or needed to include. INVISIBLE^knock! 15:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Respectfully, that is your personal and biased opinion. As you know, importance is relative. As long as there are sources behind the fact and it is written in a ethical non-biased fashion, I see no harm in it.

185.32.100.228 (talk) 15:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

@185.32.100.228: Right, go ahead! INVISIBLE^knock! 15:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks!

185.32.100.228 (talk) 15:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I made an edit to a page. The Invisible Man reverted it. I didn't think my change was unconstructive, nor even contentious.

In

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violet_Jessop#Britannic

There is a misleading statement (which I removed, and the Invisible Man replaced):

"British authorities hypothesized that the ship was either struck by a torpedo or hit a mine planted by German forces. Conspiracy theories have circulated that suggest the British were responsible for sinking their own ship.[9] Scientists have been unable to reach definitive conclusions as to the true cause.[9]"

I removed the mumbo-jumbo "Scientists have been unable..." because the German records of U73 state that the Britannic was sunk by a single mine, and a dive in 2003 found the mine anchors near the wreck:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMHS_Britannic#Wreck

81.149.136.94 (talk) 21:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Duplicated, dunno how. This user interface is a masterpiece of confusion.

81.149.136.94 (talk) 21:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

81.149.136.94 (talk) 21:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

ROFL! That's 'cause I'm Invisible Guy! And about your addition to that article, You didn't provide any sources to prove your changes. Goodnight, will reply tomorrow! INVISIBLE^knock! 21:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Seems you were editing too fast here. It was 2602:30A:2CD8:76C0:10BE:5B3E:3322:AE6C that added a broken infobox that clearly doesn't belong. 162.205.135.108 was probably trying to clean that out and accidentally took a bit of legitimate text with it. But you reverted back his edit, leaving a page filled with broken template code, and cited "unexplained removal" when what he was trying to remove was quite clear. Modulus12 (talk) 01:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Eh! S/he could have fixed that infobox instead removing (-1,116)‎ bytes, It's his fault not to give any summary otherwise how am I going to who is vandal and who's not; and yeah I forgot to check that article after reverting, Sorry. INVISIBLE^knock! 05:24, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

@Modulus12: Hey, How about re-adding that infobox? I don't see any mess there. INVISIBLE^knock! 05:26, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

I'm crazy editing this script! Sorry, I messed up! Someone got that fixed btw. INVISIBLE^knock! 06:04, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Carl Johnson (Grand Theft Auto).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

whoops! someone replaced that :( INVISIBLE^knock! 17:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi there! Just a small FYI: entries at Wikipedia:Pages needing translation should not be removed until they really are deleted, because there is always a chance that the deletion nomination is rejected. Then we are still left with an untranslated article that needs to be re-added to the list. - HyperGaruda (talk) 10:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

@HyperGaruda: Oh yeah! I've reverted my edit, thanks. INVISIBLE^knock! 10:47, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

I can't citation in Mobile pls..I am adding back that content((unsigned| Hspa.22}]

@Hspa.22: Feel free to add them back once you get on PC or have reliable sources. INVISIBLE^knock! 09:45, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

ANI? For me, it's bed! 'night Jim1138 (talk)

@Jim1138: ROFL ! not for you, I was talking with ‎Hspa.22. See I've mentioned him there. INVISIBLE^knock! 09:54, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Oops! I got your message wrong INVISIBLE^knock! 09:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

That user got blocked as a sockpuppet.INVISIBLE^knock! 14:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
2,577		GIF (talk)						Add sources
74		South Asian pickles (talk)						Add sources
2,250		Enthiran (talk)						Add sources
460		Vijayadashami (talk)						Add sources
26		Mirchi Bada (talk)						Add sources
4,409		Rajasthan (talk)						Add sources
489		Skindred (talk)						Cleanup
2,154		American Express (talk)						Cleanup
52		Bread in Europe (talk)						Cleanup
398		Music festival (talk)						Expand
1,084		Nantes (talk)						Expand
58		Sheermal (talk)						Expand
1,086		Jodhpur (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
42		Rice and curry (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
39		Travel incentive (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
3,037		Credit card (talk)						Merge
34		Pachadi (talk)						Merge
4,144		E-commerce (talk)						Merge
599		Intuit (talk)						Wikify
385		Payment system (talk)						Wikify
69		Salt-rising bread (talk)						Wikify
45		Cashkaro.com (talk)						Orphan
1		Ad Duru` (talk)						Orphan
2		Amphimallon vivesi (talk)						Orphan
33		Sarapatel (talk)						Stub
8		Reward website (talk)						Stub
70		Sheer khurma (talk)						Stub
118		Dahi vada (talk)						Stub
54		Boondi (talk)						Stub
110		Sarson da saag (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Invisible Guy (just call me Bob if you reply to me)! :-) I recently added a part on Rachel David's article where I stated that "she is also a close friend of his" or something along the lines. I understand the strict rules of no citations but if you watch many of Matthew Santoro Vlogs' videos you can clearly see she is a friend of his. I wasn't sure though how to put in a source of verify that so I just left it blank. Thank you! From Bob 121.72.176.6 (talk) 07:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

@121.72.176.6: Hi Bob, that's the problem. We should avoid original research on wikipedia. Happy editing INVISIBLE^knock! 07:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

User page semi-indef protected. INVISIBLE^knock!

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I need semi-protection on my userpage User:Invisible Guy and It's subpages, I've been reverting vandalism so I don't wanna any vandals get there. will it be fine If I placed a request on Wikipedia:Requests for page protection? INVISIBLE^knock! 08:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Absolutely, of course. SwisterTwister talk 08:07, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for your swift response. INVISIBLE^knock! 08:10, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

	:)
	Thanks, See u .... Lessknownhistory (talk) 06:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Happy editing! INVISIBLE^knock! 06:49, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Can you provide me your facebook details on private ! Hermanonline (talk) 17:42, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Hermanonline: You may find this page helpful - User:Invisible_Guy/External_Links, and yeah knocking me on FB won't let your autobiography stay on wiki. - INVISIBLE^-Talk! 17:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

I don't bother doing much on Wikipedia these days. This is why. -- Automatic instantaneous reversion of perfectly correct contributions. This is the same logic that the Chinese government has about Tiananmen Square. 78.147.66.187 (talk) 12:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

First of all, you signed your edit outside userspace; Second you added external link not as reference and not in External Links section either; and third they are not important or needed to be included here.- INVISIBLE^-Talk! 12:49, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

The French version of this page contains a mention of this event. I think you are very arrogant if you consider that your judgement is better than mine, or theirs, and that you are entitled to destroy other folk's contributions, instantly. 78.147.69.136 (talk) 17:47, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Now who are you? If you're 78.147.66.187 then an advice - Don't sign your edits outside userspace and talk pages. - INVISIBLE^-Talk! 17:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

One more thing : I take it as personal attack too, take care of that; and don't talk like you know everything- INVISIBLE^-Talk! 18:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

from: Elsa Enchanted (talk) 15:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

@Elsa Enchanted: Aha! Thanks, but you're too late. INVISIBLE^knock! 15:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Whoops! Sorry about that! Elsa Enchanted (talk) 15:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)