This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | Archive 57 | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 |
ARCHIVE PAGE 57: September 2012
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Premium River Pine Brook Wetlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black duck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:28, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi! Welcome to the sixth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!
As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!
You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. EdwardsBot (talk) 00:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak#Suggesting a Commons deletion?'s talk page. 00:36, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
They must changed the status within the last 10 days. The bot had pulled the data on September 1 when the page was active. I have deleted the article now. — Ganeshk (talk) 02:15, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Please see: User talk:Anna Frodesiak#Suggesting a Commons deletion? 01:58, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geoduck aquaculture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spawn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Dear Invertzoo, I think I might ask you for your help again. Somebody placed a deletion tag on my article I created 3 years ago about Giorgi Latsabidze. You and some other editors as well helped me in editing, the article got better ans better. There are enough relyible sources, enough supporting data's. I would very much appreciate for your help and suggestions one more time. Sorry for bothering. I just don't want to have this article deleted, I put soch work into it. Best, Sausa (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your help! When you have time maybe you can see what can we fix there, I hope article will survive. I appreciate for your suggestions. Sausa (talk) 21:35, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello Invertzoo, Thanks for your message and your advices, I apologize for using some descriptive parts from Sea Slug Forum, but some descriptions are already so compressed that it's quite hard to something different because the essential is already written. And I thought it was possible to use them throught the reference system, I never wanted to put those parts as mine, I would not have this pretention. So I have rewritten some of the articles using " ..."and the reference system to stipulate that the text is inspired from a reference text. I hope everything would be ok. Best regards, Bastaco — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bastaco (talk • contribs) 13:56, 27 September 2012 (UTC)