This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 | → | Archive 50 |
ARCHIVE PAGE 43: July 2011
Hi Invertzoo. I wonder if I may ask you a taxonomic related question? In theTaxonomy section of the nudibranch article, it mentions that the animals are divided into 2 infraorders, Cladobranchia andAnthobranchia. There isn't an article for Anthobranchia, so I was going to go ahead and create one but I noticed that this infraorder is not referenced byBouchet & Rocroi 2005. Which is the most upto date source? Does this infraorder still exist? I am not so familiar with the higher taxonomic levels. I hope you are doing well, I have started to get back into nudibranchs again after a while off editing ships!Antarctic-adventurer(talk) 11:32, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Zoo,
Hope you and your family are well.
I had a dream of Wikipedia, and in the dream, I was fined $30,000 and was banned from writing any more articles. Because of this: Sinfonia Concertante for Oboe, Clarinet, Horn, Bassoon and Orchestra K. 297b. The "dream Wiki" said that I can only write on biology.
In fact, I know more of Mozart than I do of just about anything else. And I couldn't believe there was a space on Wikipedia to write on this subject.
So far, there are 584 Wikipedia articles attributed to me, and around 20 others that are not. There is no evidence to stop this from increasing in the near future.
It's a dream to be able to take photos, put them on Wikipedia and write about such beautiful, fascinating and wonderful stuff. The biology here in Australia is amazing.
Thanks for all your great support. Have fun.
kind regards Peter Poyt448 (talk) 06:21, 29 July 2011 (UTC)