![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, you stated in your declination response that you needed verifiable references not mentions however I did leave 2. One is a write up from ThisIs50.com whixh is 50 Cents website. The other is from 96.3 radio an FM station based out of the artists home town Indy. There were not mentioms but full write ups on the artist. I know you said don't ask for advicd but at this point I am not sure what you would need. It is hard to reference the music as a producer without mentions. Would actual song titles and works be better?
I added citations
Could you please tell me why did you decline this draft? Please tell me the reason.
And I want to upload my article as a official article. Please tell me what should I do.
I think that the highest building in Croatia deserves a Wikipedia page, no one bothered to open it so i am doing it. Hope you can help. Thanks!
Hi Mate, Please guide me on the reference list given in the article. I have submitted reliable sources of reference sites, but it doesn't work. so please consider this as my request for further guidance and to accept the article in future. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venkatesh.S.Kandaswamy (talk • contribs) 10:42, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind reply. Please review the below link which is reliable and secondary source for the content. http://www.worldofchemicals.com/company/360-degree-global-equipments-pvt-ltd/31737.html https://www.masterbuilder.co.in/symposium-dry-mix-mortar-system/ https://trademarking.in/details/360-Degree-Global-Equipments-Pvt-Ltd-2628154.html https://www.nispana.com/sici/360-degree-global-equipments-private-limited/ https://exhibitors.thebig5.ae/exhibitordetails.aspx?exid=exhiReg2757 https://www.indiancompany.info/company/360-degree-global-equipments-private-limited/ https://companycheck.co.uk/company/10290565/360-DEGREE-GLOBAL-EQUIPMENTS-LTD/companies-house-data Kindly suggest me, May i use this link to proceed further. Thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venkatesh.S.Kandaswamy (talk • contribs) 11:00, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi David, after careful consideration of the "notability" schema, I think Rod Pack's first chuteless skydive may belong under skydiving; is that right? Also there is no "save page" button, only publish changes Jfgottman (talk) 21:09, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Dear David, the similar article is already there with the name of the person, but in my title I am writing the full name. That's Makhdoom Rashid, and I am writing Hazrat Makhdoom Abdul-Rasheed Haqqani <- his full name, my article is totally different where i am trying to write about his life and other things, where as other article is based on a town name. Please suggest me what should I do, what should be the title name, I will be very thankful to you.
Please link
[n accordance with the requirements of bus deregulation, bus services on the Luton to Dunstable Busway are operated by private bus companies: Arriva, Centrebus and Grant Palmer Limited.]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luton_to_Dunstable_Busway
to
http://www.grantpalmer.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.199.135.127 (talk) 13:20, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
What exactly should I change with the sources to improve the article. smartalek22 (talk) 19:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi David.moreno72 and thanks for your work reviewing new articles and drafts. Please remember to check for copyright violations. The particular ones I saw in the last two days were:
== Hello David, could you take a look at the page in my sandbox & let me know if it's acceptable for submission? User:Cismithjr44/sandbox == — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cismithjr44 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cismithjr44 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
hey i updated all the details with the reference now and please re review it. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.5.253.72 (talk) 08:49, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello
Thanks for review and reply.
Yes I do agree that subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia and I can improve it instead.
I referred article and I strongly feel that it lacks in coverage.
I cant update that as the way of describing and covering topic of interest is totally different.
I request you to get existing and my article reviewed by experts without disclosing author details.
I feel existing can be replaced with mine.
For my article, I have checked for plagiarism using Turn-it and happy to convey that it is 0%.
Thanks
210.212.180.210 (talk) 10:57, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey! Can you please review this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Abishiekh_Jain
I provide you 3 independent articles of Abishiekh Jain( not interview link)
https://www.allindiablogging.in/2016/12/a-big-thanks-to-my-enemy-blogger-of.html
https://www.wittyfeed.com/story/36286/16-year-old-blogger-is-an-inspiration — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.166.211.83 (talk) 10:49, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
So what could should I do now Even I have reduce the Career and biography
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Abishiekh_Jain
And the lengthy Biography and career is shorten to this:-
Till 2010, Abishiekh had no interest in technology nor gadgets and he kept himself away from it, as he thought it was a waste to spend time on, but now he is the one who cannot live without those, which made him famous and brought hackers den in his life.
Abishiekh never knew that by just proving his friend wrong will create a successful platform for him which will bring him laurels, fame, and money. Often in his interviews, he thanks his enemy who indirectly came and made a spark ignited in Abishiekh to start something.
Later, he began his page Hackers Den on May 10, 2014. ( when he was 14 years old ) Though, he left that page because he didn't have the time to post on their page. He didn't have money at that point, he wasn't earning, and he didn't have the guts to ask his father for money for the online things.
So he created a website in blogger with a free Blogspot domain and then shifting to a .tk domain (the name was very weird it was welcometoworldofhackers.tk) and started posting articles as it is and were all low quality, he acquired knowledge in programming but knew nothing about SEO, but yet people visited his site, and he never bothered about traffic, all he did was wrote the content, that's all. This page got a lot of recognition with 9k likes initially, and people loved his posts. His online friend Abhijit came to him and said Bigrock is offering free domains and he grabbed two domains which he is still using hackersdenabi.net and abishiekhjain.net
And he was on blogger platform.He wasn't earning anything online from hackers Den after its 1.5 years of launch, but he never thought about that. He never took Hackers Den seriously for one year after its launch and thought it as hobby until he got his first proposal to sell Hackers Den for 980 $ after it's the first-year launch and after his first interview, he turned his hobby into his career. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.166.211.83 (talk) 11:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
And I the link that I provided just a back are not interviews. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.166.211.83 (talk) 11:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
I noticed it this morning and have now rev/del'd most of it as a copyright violation. Doug Weller talk 17:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi
Thank you for reviewing my first attempt on Wikipedia. Had a feeling it would be a problem. Can I ask what is missing for it to be validated? More references? Like I said it’s my first attempt so I’m still learning
All the best
You edited my submission recently pls check i have it fixed Donsola (talk) 07:31, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
I am a small writer, please accept my article, please. Shaunak Chakraborty (talk) 12:57, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry if you just reviewed my sandbox at User:TheDoctorWho/sandbox3. I don't have any question about your review I agree with it (it was just meant to replace a portion of an article) but my question is did it come up as an article for submission? Because if so I don't remember submitting it. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:49, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey there. I saw that you left me a message when declining my article stating that Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject I'm referring to. That seems pretty logical but as I stated in WP help desk "When writing about a record label, and especially about an underground independent one, the amount of references one can find is pretty limited. I also believe that when a record label distributes music digitally, referencing their actual releases should be acceptable.". Do you have any reference in mind suitable for a case like this?
Thank you in advance, please excuse any rookie mistakes I make Messinismarios (talk) 00:39, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
please guide me step by step
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Hi thank you for your message. Yes your concern is valid and i should figure it out... there will surely be some authentic reference for his notability. Katherinehurley (talk) 13:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC) |
Why did you declined my submission and what secondary sources I need?
By:Kavenesh Chandran (Username Karrivenesh)
Karrivenesh (talk) 05:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC) @Karrivenesh: I'm sorry, but Wikipedia strongly discourages autobiographies. Also, you are not notable enough to pass WP:GNG, which is an absolute requirement for an article. Thank you David.moreno72 12:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy New Year! Best wishes for 2018, —PaleoNeonate – 02:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC) |
What do you mean by autobiographies? And what notability do I need for my Wikipedia page?
By:Kavenesh Chandran (Username Karrivenesh) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karrivenesh (talk • contribs) 07:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi David; It turned out that unique information available in German wikipedia cannot be mirror copied (via a direct link) into English and Italian wikipedia. I expect that this rule is justified. However, in the case of hardly available information, published in German language only, this problem becomes frustrating. We looked for several days to find other sources of information in vain. You can trace two particular cases already highlighted in English wikipedia (article 'Zener Prize' see e.g. Table no 1, Koster). Information on German scientist (he was active from 1935 to 1970) is not available in English. Old internal reports from his lab (hardly suitable for our article in wikipedia) are also published in German wikipedia. Translation of German pages into English is extremely difficult. Frankly speaking, we really do not know how to solve this problem.
Could you advice how we may circumvent this restriction? I hope that we may use a specific, clearly identified link just for 3-4 unique pieces of information available in German wikipedia, only. Looking forward to your advice. Thank you and a Happy New Year ... Andrew
P.S. This article is still a subject of small modifications to make it perfect. (Andrew3789 (talk) 19:30, 30 December 2017 (UTC))
Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, first: happy new year, second..Why you declined my page? I understend that is short and has one ref but I´dont speak english for this reason I put the box that need translation of the original page (Wiki español) that have the list of his works and refs --SamboValverde (talk) 08:23, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Can you review it again; I hope that the content is comply with WP terms.
Spejathaya (talk) 17:39, 2 January 2018 (UTC) spejathaya
(Omar Dakdouk (talk) 14:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC))
Hello David,
First, I want to wish you a happy new 2018 fulled with happiness and success :).
I recently wrote an article about "Transmed" which you rejected. I kept it simple so it can get approved especially that Wikipedia has a lot of prerequisites. I actually looked into already existing and approved pages for some help like Patchi so that my edits get approved, but they didnt. i also, i used Bloomberg and Zawya who are highly reputed companies to cite my entry.
is it possible for you to overturn your decision??
if not, then i will be following your advise and looking for more references listed in local newspaper and magazines and will try again.
hopefully it will be approved then.
thanks in advance.
Hi David,
Thanks for reviewing my article. It was rejected twice and my third submission has been awaiting review for two weeks. Can I ask if this submission is suitable or will it require more editing?
Regards, Rebecca
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Challenge_Advisory#Challenge_Advisory — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:D87:C300:9043:91F:2860:D40F (talk) 11:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey David! I'm wondering if you are taking messages at this time? I read all the info you provided to me about the reasons for not accepting my article. But, I am still wondering what exact changes I should make. It seems that I have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. But, perhaps there are too many citations that aren't large publications like rolling stone. However, the band did receive reviews from publications (newspapers, radio, and magazines) that were completely independent of the band. Should i perhaps only include those citations and strike the others?
Yesterdaysfire (talk) 00:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Hey David!
I also realized that I did not include the information about the group that the album was released by. Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mordecai_(Band) This may have been one of the leading reasons for the submission to be declined as well. Thank you for the help with your review as well!! Yesterdaysfire (talk) 00:36, 5 January 2018 (UTC) |
Hey David!
Sounds good! I am wondering what I should do since the applicable band page has not been added yet? Will the album article submission be possible to stay idle while the Band article is in review?
Yesterdaysfire (talk) 00:39, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
Thanks for your feedback on the last rejection of the draft. I know this was hasty work and I see now that I should have prepared better. This ends up as busy work for students with no payoff as a result. :-( sheridanford (talk) 15:10, 5 January 2018 (UTC) |
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
(Not you, but Draft:Engagement gifts is back again, after your final COPYVIO warning I went straight to ANI, so I am just notifying you because you are mentioned in the complaint) SeraphWiki (talk) 13:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi David, Thank you for your feedback on my first two submissions. I am new to Wikipedia editing, but am learning. At the encouragement of some professional colleagues, I drafted a page and had them edit it. They agreed it was fine. In my first submission, I did not include many outside references in the References section -- though they were embedded in the body. In my second submission I included the 20 or so references below from such employers as the Harvard Business School and Darden Graduate School of Business and publishers like Cambridge University Press and Prentice-Hall. I have written 20+ books in my field, written over 300 cases and technical notes, won professor of the year from my main professional organization and consulted for companies like GE and Coca Cola all over the world. The body of my page also includes a full page of various awards and honors. So, the notability hurdle seems to me over the bar, no?
Thank you for your time, consideration, and educating me on where I'm going wrong. Sincerely, James Clawson JAJISEE (talk) 21:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC) References
Darden School, University of Virginia Faculty Emeritus page [14] Level Three Leadership: Getting Below the Surface, 1-5 editions, Prentice-Hall. [15] Teaching Management: A Field Guide for Professors, Consultants, and Corporate Trainers, Cambridge University Press, 2006 [16] Balancing Your Life: Executive Lessons for Work, Family and Self, World Scientific, 2009. [17] The Washington Post Capital Business, November 27, 2013, "Is Leadership Born or Built?" Darden podcast on Powered by Feel book, [18] Darden podcast on Teaching Ethics at Darden, [19] A Song of Humanity: A Science-based Alternative to the World's Scriptures, [20] Personal Webpage, [21] Darden Ideas to Action, University of Virginia, [22] Amazon Author Page [23] Harvard Business Review Case page [24] SSRN page (one of many) [25] Goodreads.com Author's page [26] City University of Seattle Blog [27] ResearchGate page (one of many) [28] James Clawson’s Publications link shown above James Clawson’s Vita [https://faculty.darden.virginia.edu/clawsonj/General/PUBLIC/01-JGC-VITA.pdf JAJISEE (talk) 21:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi my user name is rafael santino how can i improve my reference?
my article is this : tks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Fitra_ismu_kusumo Rafaelsantino (talk) 03:23, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi David!
Thank you again for the recommendations and words of wisdom on how to compose an article properly! I plan on contributing many more articles on music groups that are somewhat lesser known in the commercial entertainment industry. Obscure bands from the 90s that many people have forgotten about, etc... But, my question is this: based on the requirements that have been deemed necessary for an article to be published (especially an independent, notable, and reliable reference for any topic), I'm wondering if it would even be possible to submit an article like this much less have expectations for it to be published. For example I would love to add an article about this band (whose music I love) that was active in the 90s in the D.C. hardcore scene but they never got much critical/notable acclaim: https://www.discogs.com/artist/303429-Lincoln-3 There is not much written online about them. But, I would love to let the greater community know about their existence if only a very brief explanation of their bands name, when they were active, member names, albums, track list, and location.
I know this may be a fairly boneheaded question to be asking and you may not have enough time to answer as I'm sure you are busy reviewing many other articles. But, if you felt inclined to send me a link to any help page that might be more specific to this kind of specific problem (and a remedy for it) I would be greatly in your debt!
Thanks again David! I really appreciate this!! Yesterdaysfire (talk) 09:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Buckmaster
Under career/studio work last sentence "Stockhausian" is represented as an active link and yet it leads to Stockhausen. This seems misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.188.191 (talk) 13:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the image - how did you find it? I did a Google Reverse Image search but nothing came up.SeraphWiki (talk) 08:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, kindly have a look at my article titled "Asif Ghauri" .. I have added some references and inline citations , but I dont know the next step...how it will be published ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kashifg (talk • contribs) 09:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear David. Hope all is well. User Omar Dakdouk has reached for me asking for guidance, which I provided and several references have been added to the article.
In addition, I understand that the transmed url is currently linking to the Trans-Mediterranean line article. Would it help if we changed the article url/ name to Transmed S.A.L as per the company registered name. Didn't want to to this prior to your final feedback in order to avoid any confusion.
Look forward to your feedback.
Tony
User
Hi David. Thank you for your patience with me again on this, as per your feedback above I have adjusted the article body and linked them to their respective and relevant references. In addition I have also linked "Quiqup" and "Beirut Marathon" mentions to their respective Wikipedia pages as they both cite Transmed as a partner and sponsor accordingly.
Awaiting your kind feedback on this latest edit. Thank you --Tony.bourached (talk) 17:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
hi , please if you could review this article, i already make improvement in referrences area, i accept any suggestion to improve
this
many tks
Rafaelsantino (talk) 23:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi David,
I saw you declined my submission for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Matthijs_Otterloo, why? The person got some reasonable mentions on the biggest news sites in The Netherlands. I think he's noteworthy enough to be on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.123.218.244 (talk) 14:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Kev1214, who submitted the (rightfully rejected) article Lil Red Riding Hood, was just blocked as a sock of Brendar 1214. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 03:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
I donot know that what is in line citition and where to add it.. If you don't mind,then can you please tell me what is it ?and where to add it? WIKI REPORT (talk) 14:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
My article is being rejected twice. Firstly the article is about an Indian actor who acts in lead roles. I have linked the flims he has acted and to the wiki page also. Can you please assist me with the reason my article is getting declined? Navanit23 14:09, 16 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Navanit23 (talk • contribs)
hey, I am new to Wikipedia and I am still learning to use it. I have been a follower of Wikipedia and I have written the article as I am getting paid for the same. Please guide me regarding the various points that are lacking in the subject I have been asked to describe the business venture which is an online artwork attracting business for the founder. The artist who has founded the website is a well-known person as described by my client who is working for him and I really want to know the ways how it can be approved on Wikipedia but in case it is not having the ability to be submitted at all, please be clear about it as I have just started working and I do not want somebody to count on me and feel cheated. I have no issues as I too understand as I am doing my job so are you.
Anamikakhatri.001 (talk) 09:49, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Please accept my article.If there is a mistake I will improve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoaib74444 (talk • contribs) 13:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you for taking the time to review Draft:Oren Kaplan.
I am sorry for the lack of references, there are many references from the Israeli media on his importance but they are in hebrew.
I added an interwiki to his hebrew page (page exist for over a decade) and some sources in hebrew, hope if it helps.
Anyway, He has been appointed president of the largest and oldest college in Israel (of which I am a student) and I made sure that it counts as notability (section 6. "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society." at Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)), his predecessor, Prof. Asher Tishler also has a page. hope this is enough and the links I added shows enough notability.
I would be more than happy to add or edit anything I can to meet the criteria.
thank you for your time!
193.106.54.37 (talk) 14:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi David,
I believe that "Banyan Tree Analytics" article has not copied any thing from any where and what I have have written that 100% accurate and correct. Can you please once again review the article and kindly accept it.
Satishdwivedi (talk) 06:44, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Banyan Tree Analytics - I am trying to write something about a company where there is no advertising present but you declined my article. Can you visit this wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolutdata and let me know what they have into their page which you accepted but you declined mines.
Thanks in advance for your time and efforts. Afronica! Afronica (talk) 06:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC) |
Respected Reviewer,Umakanta Academy and Umakanta Academy English Medium are different schools situated at the same place and have same name.Please review it again.Thankyou. Binamra Deb (talk) 09:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Respected Reviewer,Umakanta Academy and Umakanta Academy English Medium are different schools situated at the same place and have same name.Please review it again.Thankyou. Binamra Deb (talk) 09:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, i have added more coverage and references on the article for Rules of Survival. Please do help to review it and let me know if i am still lacking some other information to be inserted into the page.
Thank you so much of your time! Liuruting (talk) 02:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
You declined my draft tell me how can I improve if I will put in more information will it be accepted MohammedAsimCh (talk) 18:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear David, There is not any problem to referee reliable sources for all issues that are not supported by the high school mathematics and physic-chemistry. However, as you certainly have understood, the subject is a SToE updating the nobelist Lord Kelvin's vortex ring first idea in 1867, but with a new approach and consideration of the knowledge till now. Consequently this SToE is against the STANDAR MODEL which is protected by the Scientific Community (similarly to the protection of the geocentral theory by epicycles). In order to save your and my time you are kindly requested to confirm the possibility to fit this document to Wikipedia's policy. Just for your personal curiosity the STANDARD MODEL need super-computers to explain the stability of nucleus from protons and neutrons. Terrible mistake, from 1936 till now, consider neutrons as nucleons. The reality is that neutrons are unstable complexes of proton and electron (according to the SToE, the small thick ring of proton is in the center of the large and thin ring of electron). SToE need high school physics and mathematics (mainly stereo geometry’s tetrahedral and dodecahedral symmetry) to explain the stability of nucleus, consisting of protons in astable atom. Best regards Konstantinos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksp.papath (talk • contribs) 10:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear David, There is not any problem to referee reliable sources for all issues that are not supported by the high school mathematics and physic-chemistry. However, as you certainly have understood, the subject is a SToE updating the nobelist Lord Kelvin's vortex ring first idea in 1867, but with a new approach and consideration of the knowledge till now. Consequently this SToE is against the STANDAR MODEL which is protected by the Scientific Community (similarly to the protection of the geocentral theory by epicycles). In order to save your and my time you are kindly requested to confirm the possibility to fit this document to Wikipedia's policy. Just for your personal curiosity the STANDARD MODEL need super-computers to explain the stability of nucleus from protons and neutrons. Terrible mistake, from 1936 till now, consider neutrons as nucleons. The reality is that neutrons are unstable complexes of proton and electron (according to the SToE, the small thick ring of proton is in the center of the large and thin ring of electron). SToE need high school physics and mathematics (mainly stereo geometry’s tetrahedral and dodecahedral symmetry) to explain the stability of nucleus, consisting of protons in astable atom. Best regards Konstantinos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksp.papath (talk • contribs) 10:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear David, There is not any problem to referee reliable sources for all issues that are not supported by the high school mathematics and physic-chemistry. However, as you certainly have understood, the subject is a SToE updating the nobelist Lord Kelvin's vortex ring first idea in 1867, but with a new approach and consideration of the knowledge till now. Consequently this SToE is against the STANDAR MODEL which is protected by the Scientific Community (similarly to the protection of the geocentral theory by epicycles). In order to save your and my time you are kindly requested to confirm the possibility to fit this document to Wikipedia's policy. Just for your personal curiosity the STANDARD MODEL need super-computers to explain the stability of nucleus from protons and neutrons. Terrible mistake, from 1936 till now, consider neutrons as nucleons. The reality is that neutrons are unstable complexes of proton and electron (according to the SToE, the small thick ring of proton is in the center of the large and thin ring of electron). SToE need high school physics and mathematics (mainly stereo geometry’s tetrahedral and dodecahedral symmetry) to explain the stability of nucleus consisting of protons in stable atom. Konstantinos Ksp.papath (talk) 10:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Mr David.moreno This wikipedia page is for own Sharif Foundation that i copy Sth from our website ( and i'm theire employee ). Please check our wkipedia again and give us permission to publish it.Zzahraa188 (talk) 10:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC) Thanks alot
Zzahraa188 (talk) 10:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Mr. David.moreno this page iss in my native language punjabi wiki. I have wrongly pasted in my sandbox of english wiki instead punjabi wikipedia --Nachhattardhammu (talk) 14:45, 23 January 2018 (UTC)--Nachhattardhammu (talk) 14:45, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Sadiq Dawar (talk) 13:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Sadiq Dawar (talk) 13:52, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, David.moreno72. Firstly, thanks for your kindness and suggestions helping me create my first wiki page: iMobie. But there are still much more things I need to do. You have left me the comments "Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The current references are not about the subject, but their products." on 17 Jan; "No newly added references that have significant coverage about the subject. This was mentioned in the previous decline but has been ignored. The subject is obviously not notable and easily fails" on 18 Jan.
The truth is that there are only some product-related references I can find and gather from the internet, and took lots of time but find no direct reference to the subject iMobie. Cloud you please give me another advice on this issue? Many thanks in advance.
Hi David,
A warm Good morning to you. I have made the changes to the Freshdesk wikipedia page according to the wikipedia policy with lots of citation. Please review it and give me your feedback.
Have a nice day!
Dear David - Life in the Afc salt mine can get one down on occasion, so I just wanted to thank you for all that you've done and are doing. A record of reviewing that is truly impressive. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
why my draft is getting declined?
Arundevarajankrishnan (talk) 08:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
An abandoned non-AfC userspace draft sent to AfC and declined will either get fixed and promoted or deleted G13. Either is a definitive result. The alternative, if no CSD applies, is MfD where a Keep result lands it back in the userspace draft backlog forever with no definitive path forward. It's very tough to check copyvio on my device and I'd rather move through the list and move 50 pages toward deletion or promotion then attempt to completely fix and review a simgle topic I'm no expert on. Hope that helps explain what you are seeing. Legacypac (talk) 09:44, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello David,
Thank you for reviewing the submission for GoLookUp (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:GoLookUp) as quickly as you have. I have a small question. The submission was declined due to "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". We have revised the value numerous times with different types of sources, but it seems to be insufficient. There are other values on Wikipedia similar to ours (stubs) with no refs at all, so I would be happy to know what to do.
Thank you very much in advance,
Ramaus2018
Ramaus2018 (talk) 13:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Yes....I get it...I'm a new editor and you are experienced....one way to go... All you did was make me decide never to create...edit or have anything to do with Wikipedia..Thanks a bunch... No offense ...truly...wat was I thinking...that I could ever bring an information to wiki...guess I'll just leave...😥 Lharnee Bloom (talk) 20:15, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi David -
Thank you for the review. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. I've included references in the footnotes. Do you need more references? I'm just trying to figure out how to get this approved. Rarzon (talk) 17:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)