Stop vandalizing. You are about to be blocked

I am not vandalizing. I am correcting the facts. Gennady Golovkin does not have 20 title defenses of a MAJOR world title. The WBA (regular) and the IBO are not MAJOR world titles. Gennady Golovkin became a world champion on July 26 2014 against Daniel Geale after being elevated to the position of WBA SUPER champion. WBA Super champions are world champions. Therefore his title defenses began 10 title defenses ago.

that is original research. realible sources says he has made 20 defenses, so that is what we are going by.--Fruitloop11 (talk) 15:53, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If the WBA regular belt is a major world title then why isn't anyone saying that Deontay Wilder and Anthony Joshua need to fight Manuel Charr to become undisputed?

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 16:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CaPslOcksBroKEn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Since I was told of my imminent blockage I have not made any opposing edits CaPslOcksBroKEn (talk) 16:19, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

For the block to be invalid, you must show you didn't engage in any edit warring at all. Yamla (talk) 18:45, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zuri Lawrence, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tony Thompson and Ray Austin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Your edits at Canelo Álvarez tend to affect several articles (at least four), and need consensus due to differing sources. I highly recommend starting a new discussion at Talk:List of lineal boxing world champions for this to be straightened out. As I'm sure you know, there's already been a similar mess regarding Tyson Fury. Mac Dreamstate (talk)

Why so hasty? Discussion has been started, so there is no need to revert to your revision until consensus has been reached by WikiProject Boxing. This is poor form on your part. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, this is very poor form by you. You're edit warring without waiting for a consensus to be reached at the above talk page. Do I need to go to WP:EWN? Mac Dreamstate (talk) 20:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The most recent page I changed was the list of boxing champions. I do not understand how this can be considered edit warring as on Alvarez's Wikipedia page it says in his most recent victory that he won the vacant lineal middleweight championship. Regardless of my opinion on whether he 'vacated' it or not, it is correct according to Wikipedia. I think it is poor form to have inconsistencies on this matter.

On top of this, the latest accepted version of Saúl's Wikipedia page shows this. So if this is the consensus currently, by listing him as the lineal champion I am not edit warring. You are showing poor form by not noticing these details and threatening to block me as a result of your ignorance.

You're misunderstanding what I mean by stable revisions. For most of 2017 and up until last week's fight, Álvarez was not listed as the lineal champion at his own article, nor at the list of boxing champions or lineal champions. Those were the stable revisions I'm referring to. You were the one who recently (within the past 72 hours) added the lineal title back to those articles, which is now the disputed revision. It's really not that difficult to simply wait until other editors have weighed at the discussion, before repeatedly restoring your revision of the article(s).

And I'm not threatening to block anyone—no need to make this a "big drama show", when WP:EWN is standard practice in situations like this. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do have disputed revisions on these pages, but the current latest accepted version of Saúl's boxing record shows that in his last fight, he won the vacant lineal middleweight title. So to not list him on the other articles as such shows an inconsistency that shouldn't be there.

On another note, if we are going to differ from our most used source (The CBZ) when it comes to listing the lineal champions then how is that not considered original research?

The "current latest accepted version" does not invalidate that the previous revision describing him as a former lineal champion, which went largely unchallenged since May 2017, was the stable revision. That, plus the three other articles. Yours is not a stable revision, as there has been edit-warring going on for the past week from all comers. Therefore, the stable revision from May 2017 to August 2018 should be retained until consensus has been reached. This is basic practice on WP.

CBZ is certainly not the most used source for lineal champions on WP—not sure where you got that from. For a while it's been a mix of TBRB, CBZ, and whatever else can be dredged up from mainstream media. In fact, the discussion on which sources we are to use for lineal champions has so far been inconclusive, and clearly needs restarting. I invite you to join in with that discussion as well—the more editors on board, the better. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At this time I am not arguing the 'former lineal champion status' I am arguing that according to the current latest accepted version shows that he won the VACANT title in his last fight. Also, when it comes to the list of lineal champions in each division Wikipedia does not use any other source apart from CBZ as The TBRB does not maintain a list. So to clarify, when it comes to listing current and former lineal champions on Wikipedia the only source we use is the CBZ, which differs from what is present, meaning that any opposing edits are original research.

As I keep saying—we need a diverse collection of sources saying that the vacant lineal title was up for grabs last week, and it needs discussing at Talk:List of lineal boxing world champions rather than here. Let's continue this discussion there.

The TBRB does not maintain a historical list, but they maintain a current list of whom they consider lineal champions, and are an actual organisation unlike CBZ. Your insistence that CBZ is the only authority on lineal champions, and all else being WP:OR, strikes me as odd. On what are you basing this? Mac Dreamstate (talk) 00:21, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is my last post here simply in response to your second paragraph. I have a large list of disagreements that I have with the CBZ, but since Wikipedia claims that the official list of the lineal boxing champions is maintained by CBZ, I would assume that we would not be diverging from it based on our own original research. Especially since Wikipedia supposedly does not use original research. At the end of the day, the only two sources we use when it comes to listing the historical to present list of lineal champions and the biggest problem we have with it is that only one of these sources maintain a "complete" list of these champions. Also, since these two sources have differing opinions on one of the current champions, the current structure of the list should show these disputes rather than a combination of both sources without citations

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Tillis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carl Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Elisha Obed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Gary Smith, Henry Hall, Henry Mitchell, Juan Serrano and Doug Rogers

Samuel Serrano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to San Juan, Carolina, Mario Martinez, Ponce and Wakayama

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Matthew Saad Muhammad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Michael Green, Larry Davis, Chris Wells and Jerry Martin

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Jaco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Douglas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CaPslOcksBroKEn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlos de León, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Morgan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_lineal_boxing_world_champions#What_about_vitali_klitschko?

get back to me on my talkpage, the baker-marciano fight is very important & i want to expand on it, create an article what could have been according to 2013 award winner lubek's threelogy! mywikibiz.com/2356 encyclopediasupreme.org/Rocky