Hi Britishtea567! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:11, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Britishtea567, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Sharing wisdom 143 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:46, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you tag the above article again with WP:CSD#G5, you risk being blocked. I've already reverted you once, and you've reinserted the tag. Also, you may comment at the AfD, but you may not "manage" it. You are not an administrator, and you are not permitted to remove another user's comment.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Britishtea567, you don't sound like a brand new user, are you? GSS ^💬 12:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23 Why did you remove AFD tag from Frankie Quiroz without the community reaching the consensus ?
Thank You
Note: the rollback was undo by User:Serial Number 54129
- Britishtea567 (talk) 13:10, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not remove the AfD tag. I removed the G5 tag. Serial Number did not revert me. They made a dummy edit so they could accuse me of misconduct in their edit summary.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23 That's totally understanble, btw can you explain why that page is not eligible for G5? here I'm citing the comment of Serial Number 54129 from the discussion page.

" The article was created by a sock—User:Wesleyner7—so should be eligible to be deleted under G5. Unless, of course it has substantial edits by others. User:Bbb23 argues that it is not eligible for such deletion, presumably because it does indeed contain edits by others. But substantial edits? The first 11 edits are by the sock. Then an editor disambiguates a link and sorts categories. Another editor adds a short description and a maintenance tag. The next seven edits are by the same sock master, Wesleyner7, using another account. Another editor adds a speedy tag; another editor declines it. The next three edits are adding this AfD nomination, and then a notability tag. Now, User:FreezerBernie makes some actual prose edits (the first time this has happened from a non-sock, note). A bot, meanwhile, dates the maintenance tag. And that's the complete editing history until the G5 tagging/decline.

So it appears that the only non-sock/maintenance edits to the article were FreezerBernie's, and they comprise 3.5% of the total article history. Substantial, not. "

Bbb23 what you think?

Britishtea567 (talk) 13:27, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, someone actually asks me why the page is ineligible for WP:CSD#G5. I read SN's lengthy comments at the AfD, which, btw, are inappropriate. They would have done far better to simply post to my Talk page and ask me why I removed the tag rather than assume my reasons. The tag has the following requirements with respect to socks: (1) the creator of the article must be blocked; (2) the article must have been created after the sockmaster or other sock was blocked; and (3) there must be no susbtantial edits by other users. I don't bother with the third requirement if the first or second is not met. In this instance, the second is not met. The master, Wesleyner7 (talk · contribs · count) was blocked on January 24. The article was created on January 11. A handy rule of thumb is that pages created by a new sock farm are never eligible for G5.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:47, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only minor misconduct, Bbb23. BritishTea567, your most important issue is neither that article or G5s, but the points made / questions asked from NinjaRobotPirate and GSS (who I hope is preparing their RfA acceptance speech as we speak) regarding previous accounts. And while you're at it, why you created this account purely in order to delete that particular article? ——SN54129 13:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]