Your User page is the wrong place to create and then submit a draft. Use WP:YFA to create a draft and then submit it for review. Once you have created the draft, remove all the content from your User page. See WP:UP for what DOES belong on a User page. David notMD (talk) 21:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extremely grateful for the prompt review. I have made all the necessary changes. Hopefully the article it will be accepted and published.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by User4edits were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Apart from one reference [1], I do not find any other source mentioning him as a civil servant. Please do not try to game the system. In any case, notability is not established. Media mentions are PR pieces, and Addl Secy rank is not inherently notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manoj Kumar (lawyer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, AlokeAlokeAloke!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 01:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Important note: what is needed is not multiple copies of the same press release, published in different places. The "new" sources added to the introduction in this edit and this edit are not new sources, they are the same source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manoj Kumar (lawyer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manoj Kumar (lawyer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Government appointments rarely make a person Wikipedia-notable. Having many refs about the announcement of his appointment add nothing to notability. David notMD (talk) 10:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi David, I have made necessary adjustments within my draft and it is currently waiting for review. This is my first Wikipedia article, starting with someone who I consider as my mentor. Could you please help me with a speedy review process as I would like to present him his published page as a gift?