This is AlexNet22's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello! AlexNet22,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
|
Dear Alexnet22,
A large number of IP addresses have been adding references to the concept of "decision streams" and the recent arXiv posting 1704.07657 across several articles. I assume that these IP addresses and you are all the same person -- my apologies if this is a mistake. Unfortunately, this behavior is not in accordance with the rules and policies of Wikipedia, and so I have removed your additions. I know that this is frustrating, but Wikipedia is not an appropriate venue to publicize brand-new research. The concept of decision stream might be an excellent one; if so, it will be adopted and studied more widely in the relevant academic community, papers about it will be published by authors other than its inventors, and it will become possible to write a well sourced article on the topic and link it from other Wikipedia pages. But now is too early. You can see some related comments from another user here; you are also welcome to discuss at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics, a centralized discussion page for articles in Wikipedia related to mathematics, where other users can give you their opinions.
All the best, JBL (talk) 19:41, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:47, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Where do you see at least one external link, David? AlexNet22 (talk) 18:33, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Serial Number 54129. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Please do not spam thirty editors with the same message; it is unnecessary and will not attract support for your way of thinking. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 09:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Not spamming a zillion people with your complaints would be an excellent idea, too William M. Connolley (talk) 10:00, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 10:06, 29 July 2018 (UTC)(edit conflict) You appear to be running some kind of code to rapidly mass-distribute your message onto random users' talk pages. Publishing the same message in many places (let's call it forum shopping) is unproductive and disruptive, and using a program to make automated edits without approval is not allowed. I have blocked you to prevent execution of your program. I will gladly unblock you if:
Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 10:26, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
AlexNet22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn't use any scripts, but asked different administrators for help manually submitting several pages at the same time
Decline reason:
However you did it (and posting to 14 different editors within the same minute looks pretty fast for manual editing to me) you were blocked for spamming a whole bunch of editors with the same message and not stopping when asked. You have not addressed that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:38, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AlexNet22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Ivanvector, Of course, I'm not going to use any scripts. AlexNet22 (talk) 13:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:22, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Joel B. Lewis. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about a user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors may result in you being blocked from editing.
Note: Specific thread is; User talk:Joel B. Lewis#Campaign of [redacted] against "Decision Stream" - theWOLFchild 09:39, 12 August 2018 (UTC)