An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agros Nova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
RS6784, as you may have noticed I have over the past day responded to complaints and issues stemming from Rajput-related articles at various venues including my talkpage, ANEW, ANI, Talk:Rajput and Talk:Zamindars of Bihar. I am dropping this note to you (and other involved editors) in order to remind you all of the WP:GSCASTE and WP:ARBIPA discretionary sanctions applicable to this subject area, and since the edit-warring, grievance collection and tit-for-tat complaining that I have observed has become disruptive. Setting aside the questions of past interactions and who-is-more-to-blame for now, please try to model your individual editing (which you alone control!) in the future to be in line with wikipedia's content and conduct policies and best practices. Abecedare (talk) 19:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cyrus Bagwadia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dupont.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Hukum boht badhiya javab dete ho itihas choro ko ap. Ahir gujaro ki pol khol di apne badhiya par jaato ka bhi dekho kuch. Sabse jyada itihas inhone churaya hai. Tomar vans ko bi chura rahe hai. Inka bi pol kholo. jay matadi 🙏🏻 103.250.145.175 (talk) 16:41, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
You have nominated 4-5 articles created by user LRBurdak, two of which are deleted and others are under discussion. I searched for user's history and this editor created quite a lot of articles [1]. While some are notable, many specially articles related to Jat history which by the way are many are poorly sourced and seems to be not notable enough for wikipedia. Many articles are written as if it is Jatland.com which contains same articles with similar language. In my opinion all such articles are to be identified and nominated in combined manner, see WP:MULTIAFD. I think this will be far less laborious and will end this mess. Sajaypal007 (talk) 10:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello Akalanka820, I want to briefly discuss about your edit on Mu'izz ad-Din article. Here (though it was a year ago); you removed content which is backed by Sita Ram Goel citation, Special:MobileDiff/1059572900. I think that Goel was still a reputable historian of his time though a Hindutva zealot in his later life but still a academic author to be included with a tag of better source needed. However, I agree with you that his most likely assasinators were Khokkars a warlike tribe of Punjab, whom he thrashed brutually in his last campaign just prior to his assasination. Packer&Tracker «Talk» 13:11, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Packer&Tracker has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding ((subst:Kitten)) to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with ((subst:Kittynap)).
Packer&Tracker «Talk» 17:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
TonyBallioni (talk) 23:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hey, i realised after reading the article in one go that bombarding so many case studies regarding rape and sexual misconduct is not the correct way to write a caste related article. A summary may be sufficient for that. You may go through edits to remove the "case studies", you were talking about. I will create a more suitable article on that subject when get time. ThanksAdmantine123 (talk) 12:05, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
You may move this comment of mine to talk page of that page. LukeEmily has also supported this view. Thanks and best wishes. Admantine123 (talk) 12:06, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rajputs in Bihar. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Hemantha (talk) 03:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
This is in response to this latest talk post of yours. except the two case study of individual village which can be explained on a better page
is once again repeating without any policy basis, the argument that "this content belongs in some other article". We are all competent to see what you added. What is expected of you now is to read the objections I and LukeEmily raised in our reverts and replies and take it forward instead of repeating the same things ad nauseum. Read WP:STONEWALLING. Go back and edit your reply. Hemantha (talk) 18:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Dear, this article mentions survey conducted by officials in govt. of Bihar, which clearly mentions two distinct- OBC and EBC categories.[1] This article from prominent local newspaper clearly mentions distinct communities categorised into OBC and EBCs respectively.[2] This institute established by Govt. Of Bihar mentioned distinct quotas for OBC and EBC castes. [3] I think these are enough to establish constitutional status of backward castes in Bihar and there's no need to add "upper" prefix to backward castes if we have removed "upper" caste from previous sentence already. Regards. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 10:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
I'm not saying that those sources are wrong, these communities do form upper strata of backward castes but as it has been decided to not mention upper/lower term in the lead (they've removed "upper caste" from previous sentence too despite sources provided by me) I don't think that is required, "other backward castes" or OBC will work, we don't need to add "upper" prefix as sources provided by me states too. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 11:12, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
So, either we should remove it altogether or I can also reinstate my sourced phrase which was deleted citing the same rule. We can't have different rules for same thing. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 11:28, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
I had also added that on lead only. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 11:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
LukeEmily The matter has been settled, you don't need to waste your time on this. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 04:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hey , Wikipedia is a collaborative platform and i noticed that trust deficit makes things worst here. I remember some editors, who after getting engaged in edit dispute with me on one article tried to destroy other articles to which i significantly contributed. Fortunately they were blocked after I took the matter upto WP:AE. Its also true that i was not here for long and i do only sourced edits , but many a times due to later edits by other editors and bots linked page are removed and it appears that it's not sourced. The best way for such content is to "tag for citation needed" or if interested finding citation for it rather than merely contesting that someone has acted in bad faith. Recently i noticed your activities at Bihari Mauritians and you may have seen that another editor had removed some content on the same ground i mentioned above, but actually it was also sourced and they just assumed that it was some kind of pov-pushing to uplift social status of some castes. Anyways, i just wanted to say that i am writing an article and in that page you may find things that may appear "entirely new concept" to you. Like Kurmi being at top of caste hierarchy in a particular village, where a caste army first arrived to take on Dalits, they called Kurmi as Malik or Zamindar. I know there can be disipute on these things because of a contradictory view that " No, only 4 caste can do this, this can't be true of Kurmis" etc etc. So, if you have time , you may go through [5] _ Smouldering Dalit fire in Bihar whole chapter. This will make my day as lot of hard work is required to create an article and if on the basis of controversial and non- controversial content edit warring occurs, it comes as discouragement to editors like us. Will request to take it positively and don't use it anywhere else as this can't be a ground to get me sanctioned. Cheers :)Admantine123 (talk) 17:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
@Admantine123: Being the another editor you're referring to, I want to clarify that I had removed that content because the source was not added at the end of the sentence but at the end of the paragraph, which I had missed BUT the context with which it written was quite misleading as a title was linked to the article of an Indian community and the source was not quoted fully pretty conveniently and missed the only word which was fortunately added later by Akalanka820, hence, cleared any misconception. Your activities on the Pages of both Rajput and Rajputs in Bihar has been quite suspicious, (evident from the talk page itself, where you were caught misquoting or quoting selectively, with your old user-name). And I'd like to thank Akalanka820 for trying to make wikipedia a better place consistently and being unbiased. You are not supposed to accuse him of bludgeoning. Hope you give value to others' hardwork too.Iamritwikaryan (talk) 20:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello Akalanka820; Since you regularly kept an eye on Khokhar article and did a great job at it, I want to draw your attention towards one topic. In this article as it stand, it states that Khokhars are a Muslim tribe which they indeed are, but Afaik there are Hindu Khokhars as well. Here is a reliable academic reference from Dr. Rima Hooja for the same:-
As far as historical facts go, however, it is well known that Muhammad of Ghor did not die until 1206, and that too not at the hands of Prithviraj III. Rather, he was assassisnated on 15 March 1206 at Damyak. The assassins, according to some sources, were Hindu Khokars, and according to others, Ismailis
A History of Rajasthan (2006, pp:-364)
Please, give a piece of advice on it, Cheers. Packer&Tracker (talk) 06:07, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
and 379 gives another perspective here [4], therefore my point is its all complex.Akalanka820 (talk) 06:57, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Nawabzada Zulfiqar Ali Khan Qizilbash (MNA, 1965) and an assortment of gentry landholders who sought to win by activating tribal (Khokhar Rajput and Arain) loyalties.
Hello, Akalanka820
Thank you for creating Meghar Singh Sakarwar.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000))
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 01:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
@North8000:, thanks for appreciation. Akalanka820 (talk) 04:22, 22 June 2022 (UTC)