The following is a log of all deletion, requested move, and speedy renaming nominations made by InfiniteNexus. New entries are logged either semi-automatically using Twinkle or manually for bulk nominations.
Reason: Animated series that is currently scheduled to be released in 2023, so it is clearly still very early in the development process, barely in pre-production. Per WP:NFF, it should be draftified as soon as possible.
Reason: The "Google TV" brand is used to refer to three different things: a VOD service formerly known as Google Play Movies & TV (currently located at Google TV), an updated interface of Android TV often used interchangeably with the aforementioned app (currently located at Android TV § Google TV interface), and a defunct operating system for smart TVs axed in 2014 and sometimes confused for the aforementioned interface (currently located at Google TV (operating system)). A quick Google search for "Google TV" indicates that most people are looking for the Android TV interface (because it's the newest), but I'm not convinced that's there is a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC among the three terms, plus I think pointing Google TV to the Android TV interface would only result in more confusion for casual readers. Therefore, I propose that this article be moved to Google TV (service), while Google TV becomes a WP:DAB page listing all three uses.
Pinocchio (upcoming stop-motion film): nominated at RM (technical); New name: Pinocchio (2022 film) 05:11, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Reason: This page was unilaterally moved from Pinocchio (2022 film) to Pinocchio (upcoming stop-motion film), but an RM discussion at Talk:Pinocchio (upcoming Disney film) is still ongoing.
Reason: There are no other notable paintings of the same name, so it is unnecessary to disambiguate the article by the artist's name. Declaration of Independence (painting) currently redirects here as well.
Reason: Per his official website, Tom Holkenborg only uses the stage name "Junkie XL" for his works as an electronic artist. His last studio album was in 2012, and he has since transitioned to mostly film scores (which he is best known for nowadays). He did recently release his first EP in almost a decade (article), but as seen here he has been credited as "Tom Holkenborg" in virtually all of his albums since 2015. His Twitter and Instagram profiles are also titled "Tom Holkenborg", while his official website is located at tomholkenborg.com and not junkiexl.com. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:44, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: The last time an RM discussion for this page took place back in 2019, editors were unable to decide whether Godzilla: King of the Monsters (2019 film) or Godzilla, King of the Monsters! was the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Well, fast forward to today, and I think it's pretty clear that the 2019 film is the rightful primary topic, especially given the fact that it received 90,334 pageviews in the past 30 days while the 1956 film only received 7,723. While some editors in the previous RM argued that the exclamation point is not enough to distinguish the latter from the former, they seem to have overlooked the fact that there is a comma instead of a colon. If anything, the disambiguation page should be located at Godzilla King of the Monsters, without any punctuation marks. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: The editor who previously requested this page to be moved is mistaken, "Google Titan" is the name of a product line, see List of Google products § Security tools. At first glance, it looks like this stub article only covers the security token and not the chips.
Reason: No evidence that the product's name is "Speechify Text to Speech", sources and official sites all use just "Speechify". WP:COMMONNAME also applies.
Reason: Protests in India against the Russian invasion of Ukraine do not appear to be any more notable than protests happening in many other countries. Any noteworthy details from this article can just be added to Protests against the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Reason: More absurd and unnecessary redirects. These films and TV series are never called that, so it doubtful any reader would search up these keywords.
Reason: Third set of pointless redirects. A number after the phrase "Marvel Cinematic Universe" or "MCU" is ambiguous and unhelpful, and MCU phases are never called "seasons".
Reason: This redirect doesn't make sense. Why would someone who is looking for information about the black widow spider type in "widow black" in the search bar?
Reason: After removing numerous irrelevant links, there are still problems with this navbox. First and foremost, this navbox is a fork of ((X-Men media)), which already has almost all of the links found here. It is excessive to list every single song in the two Deadpool soundtracks, and Wade Wilson (film character) is a redirect (there is a draft, but it was declined several times).
Reason: Never heard Wikipedia being called "The Other Wiki", plus this name is not mentioned in the article. I dug a little deeper, and it appears this was an accepted AFC request based on an obscure TV Tropes page, which is not enough to justify this redirect.
Reason: Highly unusual and confusing way to call these two films, extremely unlikely to be used a search term.
Draft:Proposed takeover of Twitter by Elon Musk: nominated at RM (technical); New name: Proposed takeover of Twitter by Elon Musk 18:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Draft now ready for mainspace. Both the draft and the redirect were created by me.
Reason: Per WP:COMMONNAME. An overwhelming number of sources refer to the comic book series as Secret Wars, with the current title only garnering 34 results on Google News and "Secret Wars 1984" garnering 4,170 results. (Note that just "Secret Wars" without the year gets 53,100 results, but that includes the 2015 run as well.)
Reason: Per WP:COMMONNAME. WWDC is rarely referred to as "Apple Worldwide Developers Conference"; that term yielded 16,500 results on Google News while "Worldwide Developers Conference" yielded 42,700 results. Additionally, this recent press release from Apple calls the event "Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference", not "Apple Worldwide Developers Conference", and notice that the initialism is WWDC and not AWWDC. Thus, "Apple" is a wholly unnecessary disambiguation. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:38, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Per WP:NATURALDAB, natural disambiguations are preferred over parenthetical disambiguations. "IBM Watson" is also the name used on its official website, and is commonly used in reliable sources.
Reason: There are many good reasons why these pages should be moved to their widely used abbreviations. To start with the obvious, these are their WP:COMMONNAMEs universally used by reliable sources and the public, which should replace the extremely lengthy and rarely-used WP:OFFICIALNAMEs per WP:CONCISE, WP:RECOGNIZABILITY, and WP:ACROTITLE. It's hard to imagine that any reader would take the time to type in Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (5 words) or Severe acute respiratory syndrome–related coronavirus (6 words) into the search bar. Before any members of WP:COVID-19 jump in and point me to ((Current COVID-19 Project Consensus)), rest assured I have read that page and understand that the current consensus of the WikiProject is to use the full name. But WP:CONSENSUSCANCHANGE, and I see the last RM discussion was over a year ago. Most editors who objected to a page move there did so on the grounds of WP:CONSISTENT, so to address that concern I'm requesting any related pages to be moved as well. This also makes them consistent with COVID-19, SARS, and MERS, all of which were moved following successful RMs with similar arguments (Talk:COVID-19/Archive 17 § Requested move 1 March 2021, Talk:SARS § Requested move 8 December 2021, and Talk:MERS § Requested move 15 December 2021).
Reason: Per WP:COMMONNAME (the show is widely referred to as X-Men: The Animated Series by reliable sources), WP:NATURALDAB (natural disambiguations are preferred over parenthetical ones), and WP:PRECISE (X-Men (TV series) could refer to the other X-Men TV shows found at X-Men (disambiguation).
Reason: Capitalization error. N/A is spelled as either N/A or n/a, but almost never N/a. A template editor or administrator is needed because the page is template-protected.
Reason: This page has previously been nominated to be moved to The Dark Knight five times, the last of which was in 2013 (nine years ago). In practically all of those discussions, opponents cited WP:RECENTISM as a reason why the page could not be considered a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC yet. It has now been 14 years since The Dark Knight's release, and there should no longer be any doubt that this film is the primary topic of the term The Dark Knight and demonstrates long-term significance, especially considering its numerous accolades and significant cultural impact. The Dark Knight (film) is the most-viewed article on the Dark Knight disambiguation page, and virtually all Google News results for "The Dark Knight" pertain to the film and not the character. Readers who are searching for Batman's alias are also more likely to type in Dark Knight rather than The Dark Knight, and a simple hatnote linking to Batman should be sufficient to address any concerns.
Reason: This is the widely-used WP:COMMONNAME of the emoji, I have rarely seen any sources refer to it as "pile of poo emoji". Also satisfies WP:CONCISE.
Reason: Typo (extra "s" at the end) left behind from a page move. It is highly unlikely anyone would accidentally add an "s" to "Luhansk People's Republic", a proper name.
Reason: This sidebar duplicates much of the ((2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine)) navbox, including basically the entire Military engagements section. I don't really see how a forked template will serve to benefit readers, and this only means more work for editors who must continually update both templates at the same time.
Reason: This is essentially a fork of Encanto#Cast (with a lot of copy-and-pasting involved), which is completely unnecessary and unconventional. Character lists for film series are commonplace, but there has only been one Encanto film, so this is premature. A similar page, Madrigal family, was previously merged into Encanto following a merger proposal.
Reason: Not mentioned at redirect target, and not a notable character (only appeared in a small role in one TV episode, and not expected to appear again).
Reason: Examining the links in this navbox, Three Assassins is a redirect that links back to the author's page, so it's unclear how it relates to Bullet Train. Maria Beetle (play) is also a redirect, linking to a one-sentence description on Bullet Train (novel). All six links in the Related section are only tangentially related to Bullet Train, and the articles do not mention Bullet Train. If we remove all of these problematic links that violate WP:NAVBOX, only two (the novel and the film) remain, thus failing the WP:NENAN rule of five.
Reason: Who even says "filling station"? According to the article, American English uses "gas station" while British English uses "petrol station". Now, in addition to this article being written in American English, per the Google Books Ngram Viewer "gas station" has been the most common name among the three since 1970, and this has apparently also been the case for British English since the 2000s. There are more entries on Google Scholar for "gas station" than "petrol station", and there are more Google News results for "gas station" than "petrol station".
Reason: Not only is this redirect miscapitalized, but it also doesn't make sense to redirect this to a page that only lists gas stations in one continent. Gas stations exist in other continents as well, I'm sure.
Reason: This is the WP:PRIMARY topic for "Gru" in title case (versus "GRU", in all uppercase). It received the most number of page views in the last 365 days among pages titled "Gru" in title case, which really just includes Gru (rapper) and a handful at Grus (disambiguation). The pages titled "GRU" and "Grus" shouldn't be a problem per WP:SMALLDETAILS.
Reason: These used to point to sections on Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but those sections have since be removed due to notability and WP:FANCRUFT/WP:LISTCRUFT concerns. The current targets no longer mention the redirect title, so the redirects are useless per WP:RDELETE#D8. All incoming links have been removed.
Reason: Refers to an obscure joke briefly mentioned in a documentary special. Hard to imagine anyone who would be interested in searching for this term, zero pageviews in the past 30 days, and two news results on Google Search (one of which is a primary source).
Reason: The first sentence in this article's lead states that Ocean's Eight is the actual/official title of this film, and Ocean's 8 is a stylization. The billing block of the film, seen at the bottom of this poster, corroborates that. In accordance with the convention on film articles, the article's title should reflect the actual title rather than the stylization, see examples: Alien 3, Fantastic Four (2015 film), F9 (film), XXX (2002 film), etc. Spelling out the number after "Ocean's" would also be WP:CONSISTENT with the previous films in this series, namely Ocean's Eleven, Ocean's Twelve, and Ocean's Thirteen. Notice that Ocean's Thirteen is similarly stylized as Ocean's 13 on that film's poster.
Category:Skydance Media work group articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Skydance Media articles by importance: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:High-importance Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Low-importance Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Mid-importance Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:NA-importance Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Top-importance Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Unknown-importance Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Skydance Media articles by quality: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:B-Class Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:C-Class Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Category-Class Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Disambig-Class Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Draft-Class Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:File-Class Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:GA-Class Skydance Media rticles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:List-Class Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Project-Class Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Redirect-Class Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Start-Class Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Stub-Class Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Category:Template-Class Skydance Media articles: nominated at CfD (CfD) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Reason: These categories were created for Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation/Skydance Media work group, but the taskforce had been improperly created without prior discussion (full background here). After two weeks of radio silence at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Skydance Task Force, it became clear that there is not enough interest to warrant the creation of such a taskforce, so it was marked as defunct. The above categories never worked and have been empty for weeks, since the proper code were never even added to ((WikiProject Animation)) or ((WikiProject Film)), and they will remain empty for the forseeable future unless the taskforce is revived (unlikely, given the creator has been indeffed for WP:CIR issues). There is no reason for these categories to continue existing, as they serve no purpose. Not eligible for C1 as they're tagged as do-not-delete.
Reason: All future Fantastic Four films will be set in the MCU, and it is unlikely any characters from the previous films will receive their own articles. As we already have Category:Marvel Cinematic Universe drafts, this category is no longer needed.
Reason: I don't know what the state of this category was at the time of the previous CfD discussion last year, but only one page now remains in this category: the main article. All other WB assets and subcats have since been moved to Category:Warner Bros. Discovery, and no new pages will be added to this category in the foreseeable future. As the predecessor to WBD, the WarnerMedia page should be moved there as well, leaving this category up for either merging or deletion.
Reason: Starting this new RM per the discussion above. This article was moved from its longstanding title of 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine to the current name a week ago, following this RM, on the grounds that the invasion remains ongoing. However, this new title is problematic: it uses parentheses to indicate the years of the conflict, (2022–present), but there are no other articles titled Russian invasion of Ukraine to disambiguate from. As you (should) know, parentheses in article titles are used solely for disambiguation purposes on Wikipedia, but here there is nothing to disambiguate this article from. When I brought this up a few days ago, some argued that there have been other Russian invasions of Ukraine as well, and the DAB page Russian invasion of Ukraine (disambiguation) was subsequently created. However, not only is there still no other article titled Russian invasion of Ukraine, but even if there was, this article is unequivocally still the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. As there was disagreement above as to whether the developments in Ukraine post-2022 are still considered to be part of the "invasion", I propose moving this article to simply Russian invasion of Ukraine, per WP:CONCISE and the misuse of parentheses for pseudo-disambiguation.There is also a second question, concerning the 128 other articles, drafts, templates, and categories (the search results page includes 14 redirects and the main article) that have Russian invasion of Ukraine in the title. Regardless of the outcome of this RM, should those pages be moved to Russian invasion of Ukraine, 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, or Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022–present)? Note that due to the number of affected pages, I won't be adding them to this RM nomination template, but if someone else wishes to do so, they may. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Not sure why this article was created, this is just one of the dozens of viral phenomena/topics of discussion about film that emerge on the Internet every year. Typically, such memes are not notable to justify standalone articles and are simply discussed in their respective film articles; I don't see a reason this should be any different. It is unlikely that this topic will receive significant, sustained coverage, and even if it does, it is too early to tell at this stage, when neither film has even been released. With the current length of the article, it can easily be merged into Barbie (film) and Oppenheimer (film).
List of most-followed Threads accounts: nominated at AfD; notified John Mordaunt (talk·contribs) 11:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Reason: This article is an unnecessary fork/split of Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (soundtrack) and Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse (soundtrack), where this information belongs. The music of the Spider-Verse films has not received enough recognition and commentary to justify a standalone article, and the information in this article can easily be merged into a new "Background" section on the soundtrack articles. It is unusual for film series to have a "Music of ..." article unless it is a massive, long-running franchise whose music has been closely analyzed, such as Music of Star Wars, Music of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and Music of The Lord of the Rings film series. This is not the case for Spider-Verse, which has so far only had two installments.
Reason: Despite what the name suggests, this appears to be a WP:FANCRUFTy, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and largely unsourced list of ... "themes and motifs" in the Harry Potter series, rather than the in-depth behind-the-scenes info and critical analysis you would expect — a stark contrast from other "Music of..." articles such as Music of Star Wars, Music of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and Music of The Lord of the Rings film series. Unless this article is nuked and rewritten into a well-developed article similar to the other three I mentioned, this trivial list of themes should not have its own article.
Reason: Hmm??? Unclear what the purpose of this category is when we already have Category:X-Men (film series) (note the parentheses), and the other two categories in this category are already subcategories of Category:X-Men (film series). Redundant and unneeded.
Reason: Non-notable fan film that immediately fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Two years since the project was announced, it has yet to receive significant coverage from high-quality sources, only low-quality ones such as CBR or MovieWeb. Focusing on the Internet controversy surrounding it is not enough. Additionally, this article was improperly created as a means to bypass the AfC process, after the draft pagedespite there already being a draft page (created two years ago) that was previously rejected at AfC by Dan arndt on the grounds of NFILM. (Note that Superman: Solar, another fan film closely related to this one, shouldn't have an article either.)
Reason: With only one film that has been released, an article seems premature and WP:TOOSOON. Per WP:FILMSERIES, a film series should not have its own article until it encompasses at least three films.
Template:Collaborative real-time editor softwares: nominated at TfD; notified Camoz87 (talk·contribs) 05:11, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Only two articles, so not much use for navigation. Fails the WP:NENAN rule of five.
Reason: I have never seen a navbox of this kind, and I don't think it's appropriate. For starters, this template was created by a blocked sock, has exactly one transclusion, received 10 views in the past 365 days, and is improperly formatted. On top of that, this fails points #3, 4, and 5 of WP:NAVBOX, and I'm not sure readers will find this useful for navigation purposes. We already have Category:Google employees, which is more appropriate. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:20, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Nonstandard spelling of "forever"; not a useful redirect. The draft has no history besides redirection, so it's unclear why it was created in the first place.
Reason: First, WP:COMMONNAME. "HTTP cookie" is not a very common name for cookies on the Internet — in fact, I don't think I had heard of them being called that until I found this article. The Google Ngram Viewer shows a dramatic drop in usage after 2005, when it spiked and never recovered. This article is currently buried near the very bottom of Cookie (disambiguation) and took me a while to find because Cookies redirects to Cookie (the food). Per WP:SMALLDETAILS, the plural form should be sufficient to distinguish Internet cookies from edible ones, plus there is clear evidence that Internet cookies are the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the term "cookies". HTTP cookie actually dwarfs Cookie in terms of pageviews, but obviously the food is the long-term primary topic for "cookie". For the plural form "cookies", however, this is clearly the one most people are and will be looking for.
Reason: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Miles Cheong. Unfortunately, because the page is not identical to the previously deleted version, it is ineligible for WP:G4. PROD was also declined because of the previous AfD. In that discussion, there was strong consensus that the subject is a non-notable "simp and troll", as articulated by Vice. Nothing has changed in the three months since.
Reason: <deep breath> Desperation Move is an avoided double redirect of Desperation Attack, which was in turn a redirect left behind from a move to Desperation attack, which was in turn an article "that had something to do with video games" that was converted to a redirect before being deleted in 2016, after Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 November 10#Desperation attack.
Reason: No reason for this to be additionally disambiguated. "Novel" has a second, non-literature definition, but Novel and Category:Novel templates are already undisambiguated as the primary topic, plus I don't imagine anyone will mistakenly think "novel navigational boxes" means "new or unusual navigational boxes".
Reason: Almost all of these links are only tangentially related to Inception and do not belong in a navbox about the film, per WP:NAVBOX. Only two links (not counting the main article) would qualify as appropriate links, which fails the WP:NENAN "rule of five".
Reason: The franchise is both officially and commonly named Fast & Furious. The extended form, The Fast and the Furious, almost exclusively refers to the original film, so WP:SMALLDETAILS applies. There was a time where the franchise was also named The Fast and the Furious (see the third film), but this has not been the case since 2009 (see the fourth film). Per WP:ONEOTHER, a hatnote on the film article pointing to the franchise will suffice. A similar situation exists with The Evil Dead (the original film) vs. Evil Dead (the franchise). InfiniteNexus (talk) 08:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The only articles listed at Batman and Robin bearing the title "Batman & Robin" are the film, the soundtrack for the film, and a video game based on the film, among which the film is obviously the primary topic. Per WP:SMALLDETAILS, an ampersand is sufficiently distinct from the word "and" for the title "Batman & Robin" to be unambiguous, and a hatnote linking to the Batman and Robin DAB page will suffice.
Reason: WP:SMALLDETAILS; the two commas in Crazy, Stupid, Love are sufficient to naturally disambiguate the song from the film. Hatnotes may be used to address any potential confusion. Per WP:ONEOTHER, the disambiguation page is also unnecessary and should be deleted.
Reason: Clearly not notable for a standalone article. Per WP:NOPAGE, this more suitable as a section on the main Apple Watch page than an entire article. Fails WP:NEVENT, WP:NOTNEWS, and WP:10YEAR.
Reason: This is a request to overturn the previous RM that was closed several weeks ago, per this discussion. WP:NCCORP explicitly states: If the legal status is used to disambiguate, it should be included in the article title using the company's own preference for either the abbreviated or unabbreviated form. Likewise, whether or not to include a comma prior to the legal status should be governed by company usage. Contrary to popular belief, WP:COMMONNAME is not the only criterion we consider when deciding an article's name; WP:NATURAL states that when the most common name of a subject is ambiguous (emphasis added): Using an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly as the preferred-but-ambiguous title, is sometimes preferred. However, do not use obscure or made-up names.By definition, natural disambiguation disregards the most common name, so in the case of proper names, we fall back to the official name. For titles of works, we use the subtitle even if it commonly omitted in sources; for companies, we use the official legal suffix. "Mars Inc.", however, is a made-up name using a made-up legal suffix (directly contravening NATURAL) masquerading as the company's official name. We can make things up if it's a common noun or descriptor, but we're now asserting that "Inc." (note the capitalization) is part of the company's name, which is false. There is no such company called "Mars Inc.", or "Mars, Inc.", or "Mars Incorporated". MOS:TM instructs us to modify trademarks that are stylized in a way that breaches our MoS; corporate legal suffixes do not, and none of our PAGs give editors free rein to arbitrarily modify a trademarked name without reason. WP:CONCISE discusses truncating excessively long names, not altering punctuation and inventing abbreviations.
Reason: The mountain in Greece (Mount Olympus) is the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC both in terms of pageviews and long-term significance, so Olympus should redirect there. The only page with more pageviews is Hercules (1997 film) ... which is centered on the mountain in Greece (and obviously, we wouldn't point Olympus there). In third place is Olympus Mons ... which is named after the mountain in Greece.
Reason: As one of the most influential films of all time, this is clearly the primary topic of the term "Psycho", both in terms of long-term significance and pageviews. It is also worth noting that while the informal term "psycho" can mean either psychopath or psychotic, Wikipedia is not a dictionary.
DeSantis: nominated at RM; New name: DeSantis (surname) 01:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Ron DeSantis is the primary topic, so DeSantis should be redirected there. See all-time pageviews and WikiNav. Now, I know what you're thinking: recentism, right? Well, we see that after Casey DeSantis (the wife), John DeSantis is ranked third place in terms of all-time pageviews. If we go back to before DeSantis ran for governor, he still received the second-most pageviews after John. John DeSantis is apparently an actor whose article consists solely of three filmography tables — not very notable, especially long-term–wise.
Reason: Proposing a retarget to Aliens (film). Although Alien 2: On Earth (apparently a real film) does contain the title "Alien 2", Aliens — the actual sequel to Alien (film) — is without question more notable and the more likely target when readers search for "Alien 2", seeking to find the sequel to the first film (but perhaps not remembering its title).
Reason: Since the fairy tale is titled "Snow White" and not "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs", the original Disney film can be regarded as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the expanded term. Not only because it receives the most pageviews, but also due to its cultural significance and impact. Per WP:SMALLDETAILS, readers who deliberate type "and the Seven Dwarfs" are most likely looking for the film, so it is adequately, WP:NATURALly, and WP:CONCISEly disambiguated from other topics.