Template:User wikipedia/Reviewer is part of WikiProject Userboxes. This means that the WikiProject has identified it as part of the userboxes system. WikiProject Userboxes itself is an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles and templates related to the userbox system, used on many users' pages. We need all your help, so join in today!UserboxesWikipedia:WikiProject UserboxesTemplate:WikiProject UserboxesUserboxes articles
Is that link working for others? Also, how can someone abuse lying about being a reviewer? (that didn't come out right, but you get me) Beam19:41, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The link is working. It has ((BASEPAGENAME)) so if you check it on the template itself it returns User:User wikipedia88 which is the next alphabetical name after the nonexistant User:User wikipedia. If you check any of the transclusions Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:User wikipedia/Reviewer you will see it working. The verify link is just something some people like. It is styled after the other user rights user boxes. It is more practical for admin, OS, CU, account creator, and bureaucrat rights since those are less common and more sought out when needed than reviewers would be. deliriousandlost ☯ 11:14, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you and great job. Can you make one without the verify link, it makes me feel pretentious to display a box with it? Beam16:33, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
To make a user box the is only lacking the verify link would most likely see it end up being nominated for deletion as a duplicate. You could just write it into your page.
((userbox
| border-c = #999
| id = [[File:Wikipedia Reviewer.svg|43px]]
| id-c = #DDD
| info = This user has [[Wikipedia:Reviewing|'''reviewer''']] rights on the [[English Wikipedia]].
| info-c = #EEE
| usercategory = Wikipedia reviewers
))
I also would not know what name to use for a second user box except for /reviewer and that would probably turn into a redirected page. If you really want no verify link then the safest way to do that is to write the user box into your page directly instead of via transclusion. That is what i do on my page. It can be tedious to set up if you have a lot of them but it also allows you to control the size so there are no larger ones that displace everything else or smaller than normal ones that the others wrap around awkwardly. deliriousandlost ☯ 18:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You could also copy it to a subpage of your userspace where it is unlikely to be deleted, and modify it there. Anomie⚔22:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Should the userbox say "This user has reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia" or what the topicon says "Despite the removal of pending changes, this user still has reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia". If the topicon says it if you hover over it, not click it, then the userbox ought to as well.--Thewikifyer's corner18:40, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"The Request for Comment, on the use of pending changes protection in the interim, has ended. In accordance with consensus it was removed from all articles" - a quote from the template heading the Pending Changes page; if pending changes is dormant I see no reason why the template shouldn't say "Despite the removal of pending changes, this user still has reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia" (hence why I changed it in the first place). CJDrop me a line! • Contribs17:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]