This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
WanderingWanda moved this page to Yellowstone's Zone of Death. I object to this move, because it is not what the subject is commonly called in English (per WP:NATURAL). But I do like the idea of using "Yellowstone" as a disambiguator.
How about if we move this article to Zone of Death (Yellowstone) instead? That would leave the subject as "Zone of Death", but would be easy to find by editors (also per WP:NATURAL).
Thoughts? — hike395 (talk) 05:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Natural disambiguation that is unambiguous, commonly used, and clear is generally preferable to parenthetical disambiguation. WanderingWanda (talk) 06:22, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Article should explain whether ex post facto settlement of people in the Zone for the sole purpose of being to empanel a jury would work?
Otherwise, would the legal solutions mentioned be OK to implement after such a crime took place, or would that be considered ex post facto law?
Swiss Frank (talk) 02:24, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
The first line says " result of a reported loophole in the Constitution of the United States"
Isn't the loophole in the law, not the consitution? The constitution just exists, the loophole was created by lawmakers, not the consitution.
Bomberswarm2 (talk) 04:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
The article's focus is on the Idaho part of the park, but the same logic applies to the Montana part. —Tamfang (talk) 20:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)